[1]
|
T. Bresnahan, “Duopoly Models with Consistent Conjectures,” American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 5, 1981, pp. 934-945.
|
[2]
|
M. Perry, “Oligopoly and Consistent Conjectural Variations,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1982, pp. 197-205. doi:10.2307/3003440
|
[3]
|
M. Boyer and M. Moreaux, “Consistent versus Non-Consistent Conjectures in Duopoly Theory: Some Examples,” Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1983, pp. 97-110. doi:10.2307/2097988
|
[4]
|
Y. Tanaka, “Consistent Conjectures in Free Entry Oligopoly,” Economics Letters, Vol. 17, No. 1-2, 1985, pp. 15-18. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(85)90118-1
|
[5]
|
Y. Tanaka, “On Multiplicity of Consistent Conjectures in Free Entry Oligopoly,” Economics Letters, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1985, pp. 109-115. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(88)90099-7
|
[6]
|
Y. Tanaka, “Equivalance of Cournot and Bertrand Equilibria in Differentiated Duopoly under Relative Profit Maximization with Linear Demand,” Economics Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2013, pp. 1479-1486.
|
[7]
|
Y. Tanaka, “Irrelevance of the Choice of Strategic Variables in Duopoly under Relative Profit Maximization,” Economics and Business Letters, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2013, pp. 75-83.
|
[8]
|
T. Matsumura, N. Matsushima and S. Cato, “Competitiveness and R&D Competition Revisited,” Economic Modelling, Vol. 31, 2013, pp. 541-547.
doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.12.016
|
[9]
|
M. E. Schaffer, “Are Profit Maximizers the Best Survivors?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12, 1, 1989, 29-45. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(89)90075-9
|
[10]
|
F. Vega-Redondo, “The Evolution of Walrasian Behavior,” Econometrica, Vol. 65, No. 2, 1997, pp. 375-384.
doi:10.2307/2171898
|
[11]
|
C. Lundgren, “Using Relative Profit Incentives to Prevent Collusion,” Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1996, pp. 533-550. doi:10.1007/BF00157777
|
[12]
|
L. Kockesen, E. A. Ok and R. Sethi, “The Strategic Advantage of Negatively Interdependent Preferences,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 92, No. 2, 2000, pp. 274-299. doi:10.1006/jeth.1999.2587
|
[13]
|
T. Matsumura and N. Matsushima, “Competitiveness and Stability of Collusive Behavior,” Bulletin of Economic Research 64, Supplement, Vol. 64, Suppl. 1, 2012, pp. 22-31. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8586.2012.00439.x
|
[14]
|
M. Katz and C. Shapiro, “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility,” American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, 1985, pp. 424-440.
|
[15]
|
S. Hoernig, “Strategic Delegation under Price Competition and Network Effects,” Economics Letters, Vol. 117, No. 2, 2012, 487-489. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.06.045
|
[16]
|
Y. Nakmaura, “Social Welfare under Quantity Competition and Price Competition in a Mixed Duopoly with Network Effects: An Analysis,” Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2013, pp. 211-215.
doi:10.4236/tel.2013.34035
|
[17]
|
Y. Nakmaura, “Endogenous Timing in Price-Setting Private and Mixed Duopoly with Network Effects,” 2013, Mimeo.
|
[18]
|
Y. Nakamura and M. Saito, “Capacity Choice in a Mixed Duopoly: The Relative Performance Approach,” Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2013, pp. 124-133. doi:10.4236/tel.2013.32020
|
[19]
|
Y. Nakamura and M. Saito, “Capacity Choice in a Price-Setting Mixed Duopoly: The Relative Performance Approach,” Modern Economy, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2013, pp. 273-280. doi:10.4236/me.2013.44031
|
[20]
|
Y. Nakamura, “Price versus Quantity in a Mixed Duopoly: The Case of Relative Profit Maximization,” 2013, Mimeo.
|
[21]
|
F. Y. Edgeworth, “Mathematical Physics,” P. Kegan, London, 1881.
|
[22]
|
R. M. Cyert and M. H. de Groot, “An Analysis of Cooperation and Learning in a Duopoly Context,” American Economic Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, 1973, pp. 24-37.
|
[23]
|
Y. Tanaka, “Irrelevance of Conjectural Variation in Duopoly under Relative Profit Maximization and Consistent Conjectures,” 2013, Mimeo.
|