Early versus Late Tracheostomy for Ventilator Dependence after Cardiovascular Surgery: Long-Term Results

Abstract

Although concerns exist about the possibility of infecting a sternotomy wound by performing a tracheostomy early after cardiac surgery, it has been shown that tracheostomy performed before postoperative day 10 can improve outcomes for cardiovascular surgery patients who require long-term ventilation. We retrospectively reviewed all charts for patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery and required tracheostomy at a single-institution site from January 2005 to July 2012. Patients were divided into two groups based upon whether their tracheostomy was performed less than 10 days after their initial operation (early tracheostomy) or ≥10 days after their initial operation (late tracheostomy). Preoperative demographics and postoperative complications were studied. There were no new mediastinitis episodes following tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy was associated with higher 90-day (74.4% vs 56.8%) and 180-day (47.4% vs 28.7%, p < 0.047) survival when compared to late tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy after cardiovascular surgery does not seem to be associated with an increased rate of mediastinitis but is associated with improved survival.

Share and Cite:

Ladowski, J. , Downey, H. , Ladowski, B. and Ladowski, J. (2013) Early versus Late Tracheostomy for Ventilator Dependence after Cardiovascular Surgery: Long-Term Results. World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 3, 114-118. doi: 10.4236/wjcs.2013.33022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] S. C. Murthy, A. C. Arroliga, P. A. Walts, et al., “Ventilatory Dependence after Cardiovascular Surgery,” Journal Thorac Cardiovasc Surgery, Vol. 134, No. 2, 2007, pp. 484-490. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.006
[2] J. Devarajan, A. Vydyanathan, M. Xu, et al., “Early Tracheostomy Is Associated with Improved Outcome in Patients Who Require Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation after Cardiac Surgery,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 214, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1008-1016. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.03.005
[3] A. O. Brook, C. S. Sherman, J. Moley, et al., “Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Patients Who Require Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation,” American Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2001, pp. 352-359.
[4] H. Ballota, T. Kandil, L. Generali, et al., “Tracheostomy after Cardiac Operation: In-Hospital and Long-Term Survival,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 92, No. 2, 2011, pp. 528-533. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.002
[5] J. J. Curtis, N. C. Clark, C. A. McKenney, et al., “Tracheostomy: A Risk Factor for Mediastinitis after Cardiac Operations,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2001, pp. 731-734. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02835-1
[6] S. A. Stamenkovic, I. S. Morgan, D. R. Pontefract and C. Campanella, “Is Early Tracheostomy Safe in Cardiac Patients with Median Sternotomy Incisions?” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 69, No. 4, 2000, pp. 1152-1154.
[7] P. B. Rahmanian, D. H. Adams, J. G. Castillo, et al., “Tracheostomy Is Not a Risk Factor for Deep Sternal Wound Infections after Cardiac Surgery,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 84, No. 6, 2007, pp. 1984-1991. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.024
[8] S. D. Force, D. L. Miller, R. Petersen, et al., “Incidence of Deep Sternal Wound Infections after Tracheostomy in Cardiac Surgery Patients,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 80, No. 2, 2005, pp. 618-621. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.02.056
[9] M. Engoran, N. F. Buderer and A. Zacharias, “Long Term Survival and Health Status after Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation after Cardiac Surgery,” Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 8, 2000, pp. 2742-2749. doi:10.1097/00003246-200008000-00010
[10] P. A. Walts, S. C. Murthy, A. C. Arroliga, et al., “Tracheostomy after Cardiovascular Surgery: An Assessment of Long-Term Outcome,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 131, No. 4, 2006, pp. 830-837. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.09.038

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.