Health> Vol.5 No.6B, June 2013

A comparison between reported and ideal patient-to-therapist ratios for stroke rehabilitation

DownloadDownload as PDF (Size:310KB)  HTML    PP. 105-112  

ABSTRACT

Objective: Major improvement has been made in the medical management of stroke in the UK between 2008 and 2010 based on the indicators measured in the National Sentinel Audit. However based on the same audit, no corresponding improvement has been effected to patient functional impairment levels on hospital discharge in the corresponding time frame. This study derived patient-to-therapist ratios as a means of exploring the amount of rehabilitation time for stroke patients while in hospital care. Method: A purpose specific survey was developed for completion by stroke teams. From a contact list compiled primarily in collaboration with the 28 National Stroke Improvement Networks, the Nth name technique was used to target stroke teams in each geographical area covered by the 28 networks. Results: A total of 53 surveys were returned representing 20 of the 28 network areas providing 71% national coverage. Analysis conducted on 19 of the 37 inpatient hospital care units that were discrete units, had no missing data for staff numbers, unit bed numbers, number of stroke patients treated per annum, average unit length-of-stay, and unit occupancy rates. Staffing levels for some therapies were below the Department of Health staffing assumptions suggesting that stroke units are challenged to provide the recommended therapy time. Conclusions: Most stroke units surveyed are operating below the DH staffing assumption levels and are therefore challenged in providing the amount of therapy and patient time recommended in the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines to facilitate optimal functional recovery for stroke patients.

Cite this paper

McHugh, G. and Swain, I. (2013) A comparison between reported and ideal patient-to-therapist ratios for stroke rehabilitation. Health, 5, 105-112. doi: 10.4236/health.2013.56A2016.

References

[1] National Stroke Association (2012) Stroke fact sheet. http://www.stroke.org/site/PageServer?pagename=stroke
[2] National Audit Office (2010) Department of Health: Progress in improving stroke care. http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0910/stroke.aspx
[3] Kong, K.-H., Chua, K.S.G. and Lee, J. (2011) Recovery of upper limb dexterity in patients more than 1 year after stroke: Frequency, clinical correlates and predictors. NeuroRehabilitation, 28, 105-111.
[4] (2007) National stroke strategy. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publ
ications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_081062
[5] Royal College of Physicians (2011) National sentinel stroke clinical audit 2010 round 7. RCP, London.
[6] Royal College of Physicians (2007) National Sentinel stroke audit—Organisational audit, 2006. RCP, London.
[7] (2013) Royal Geographical Society. Sampling techniques. https://www.rgs.org/OurWork/Schools/Fieldwork+and+loca
l+learning/Fieldwork+techniques/Sampling+techniques.htm
[8] Dillman, D.A. (1978) Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
[9] Venkataraman, L. and Zurawski, E. (2007) Can the Dillman Method be applied to e-mail prompting with a twenty-something population. The American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) 62nd Annual Conference.
[10] Department of Health (2009) NHS workforce planning resource. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/
[11] Longtermconditions/Vascular/Stroke/DH_081389.
[12] National Institute of Clinical Excellence (2012) Rehabilitation after critical illness: NICE clinical guideline. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12137/58250/58250.pdf
[13] National Audit Office (2010) The prevention, management and control of healthcare related infections (HCAI) in hospitals (ROCR-LITE/08/014/FT6). www.nao.org.uk/idoc.ashx?docId=df9f6955-da02-4a07-a460
[14] Royal College of Surgeons (2010) High NHS hospital bed occupancy remains a big infection risk. http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/news/high-nhs-hospital-bed-
occupancy-remains-a-big-infection-risk-says-rcs/
[15] Putman, K., DeWit, L., Schupp, W., Ilse, B., Berman, P., Connell, L., Dejaeger, E., DeMeyer, A.M., DeWeerdt, W., Feys, H., Walter, J., Lincoln, N., Louckx, F., Martens, A., Schuback, B., Smith, B. and Leys, M. (2006) Use of time by physiotherapists and occupational therapists in a stroke rehabilitation unit: A comparison between four European rehabilitation centres. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 1417-1424. doi:10.1080/09638280600638216
[16] Pring, T., Flood, E., Dodd, B. and Joffe, V. (2012) The working practices and clinical experiences of paediatric speech and language therapists: A national UK survey. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47, 696-708. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00177.x
[17] Department of Health & Royal College of Physicians (2007) Survey of stroke unit staffing and patient dependency. DH, London.
[18] DeWit, L., Putman, K., Dejaeger, E., Baert, I., Berman, P., Bogaerts, K., Brinkmann, N., Connell, L., Feys, H., Jenni, W., Kaske, C., Lesaffre, E., Leys, M., Lincoln, N., Louckx, F., Schuback, B., Schupp, W., Smith, B. and DeWeerdt, W. (2005) Use of time by stroke patients: A comparison of four European rehabilitation centres. Stroke, 36, 1977-1983. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000177871.59003.e3
[19] Kwakkel, G., van Peppen, R., Wagenaar, R.C., Dauphinee, S.W., Richards, C., Ashburn, A., Miller, K., Lincoln, N., Partridge, C., Wellwood, I. and Langhorne, P. (2004) Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke. A Meta-Analysis. Stroke, 35, 2529-2536. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d
[20] Turton, A. and Pomeroy, V. (2002) When should upper limb function be trained after stroke? Evidence for and against early intervention. NeuroRehabilitation, 17, 215- 224.
[21] Rudd, A.G., Jenkinson, D., Grant, RL. and Hoffman, A. (2009) Staffing levels and patient dependence in English stroke units. Clinical Medicine, 9, 110-115. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.9-2-110
[22] Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party (2012) National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th Edition, RCP, London.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.