A study evaluating the effect of Educational Needs Assessment Tool (ENAT) focused patient education, on health outcomes in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Protocol of an ongoing study

Bernadette Hardware, Claire Hale, Dawn Johnson, Jackie Hill, Tracey Young, Adewale Adebajo

Academic and Clinical Unit for Musculoskeletal Nursing, Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Academic and Clinical Unit for Musculoskeletal Nursing, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Medical Statistics, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
R&D Department, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK.

DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2013.32039                

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of a patient education tool (the ENAT) on self efficacy, patient knowledge, health outcomes and its usability in practice. Background: The effectiveness and value of patient education in rheumatoid arthritis have been questioned. The ENAT was developed to help the nurses to provide more focused, individualized and relevant education. The psychometric properties of the ENAT have been assessed. Design: This study is a single blind randomized controlled trial using both quantitative and qualitative methodology. The primary outcome is patient self efficacy. Secondary outcomes are physical function, psychological status, pain levels, social interaction and patient knowledge of disease. Methods: 130 RA patients will be randomized into an experimental (EG) or control group (CG). The EG patients will complete the ENAT prior to seeing a Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) at weeks 0, 16 and 32. The CNS will use the ENAT as a template to meet patients perceived educational needs in addition to the usual care. The CG will receive their usual care from the CNS without the aid of the ENAT. To determine the ENAT’s usability, semi-structured quailtative interviews will take place with the practitioners and a sample of patients once they have completed the quantitative arm of the study. Results: The study commenced in April 2011 and the results are expected to be available after April 2013. Conclusions: It is hypothesized that nurses’ use of the ENAT will lead to increased patient self efficacy, and improved patient knowledge and health outcomes among the patients who used it. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that the ENAT will be easy for staff and patients to use. Relevance to clinical practice: The ENAT was developed to assess the perceived educational needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and thus help the nurses to provide more focused, individualised and relevant education.

Keywords

Educational Needs Assessment Tool; Protocol; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Self Management; Patient Education

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Riemsma, R., Kirwen, J., Taal, E. and Rasker, H. (2003) Patient education for adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Ariticle ID: CD003688.
[2]	Lapsley, H., March, L.M., Tribe, K.L., Cross, M.J., Courtney, B.G. and Brooks, P.M. (2002) Living with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Expenditures, health status and scoial impact on patients. Annals of Rheumatic Disease, 61, 818- 821. doi:10.1136/ard.61.9.818
[3]	Arthritis Research C (2002) Arthritis—The big picture. Arthritis Research Campaign Chesterfield. Arthritis Research UK. http://www.arthritisresearchuk.org/policy-and-public-affairs/reports-and-resources/reports.aspx
[4]	Hardware, B., Lacey, E. and Shewan, J. (2004) Towards the development of a tool to assess educational needs in patiens with arthritis. Clinincal Effectiveness in Nursing, 8, 111-117.
[5]	Hill, J. (2003) An overview of education for patients with rheumatic diseases. Nursing Times, 99, 26-27.
[6]	Lorish, C. and Boutaugh, M. (1997) Patient education in rheumatology. Epidemiology and Health Services Research, 9, 106-111.
[7]	Mazzuca, S., Brandt, K., Katz, B., Chambers, M., Byrd, D. and Hanna, M. (1997) Effects of self care education on the health status of inner-city patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 40, 1466-1474. doi:10.1002/art.1780400815
[8]	Edworthy, S. and Devins, G. (1996) Improving medication adherence through patient education: Distinguishing between appropriate and inappropriate utilisation. Journal of Rheumatology, 26, 1793-1801.
[9]	Hill, J., Bird, H. and Johnson, S. (2001) Effect of patient education on adherence with drug treatment for Rheuma- Toid Arthritis; a randomised controlled trial. Annals of Rheumatic Disease, 60, 869-875.
[10]	Li, L.C. (2007) If knowledge is power, why don’t Rheu- Matoid Arthritis education programs show better outcomes? The Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1645-1646.
[11]	Brooks, P., Hochberg, M. and for ILAR and OMERACT (2001) Outcome measures and classification criteria for the rheumatic diseases. A compilation of data from OMERACT (Outcome Measures for Arthritis Clinical Trials), ILAR (International League of Associations for Rheumatology), regional leagues and other groups. Rheumatology, 40, 896-906. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/40.8.896
[12]	Kirwen, J. (2007) Patient education—From information to empowerment. Annals of Rheumatic Disease, 66, 10.
[13]	Combe, B., Landewe, R., Lukas, C., Bolosiu, H.D., Breedveld, F., Dougados, M., Emery, P., Ferraccioli, G., Hazes, J.M.W., Klareskog, L., et al. (2007) EULAR recommenddations for the management of early arthritis: Report of a task force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 66, 34-45. doi:10.1136/ard.2005.044354
[14]	Rasch, G. (1960) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainments tests. University of Chicago, Chicago.
[15]	Hill, J., Tennant, A. and Adebajo, A. (2004) Further development of an educational needs tool (ENAT) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 50, 616.
[16]	Ndosi, M., Tennant, A., Bergsten, U., Kukkurainen, M., Machado, P., de la Torre-Aboki, J., Vliet Vlieland, T., Zangi, H. and Hill, J. (2011) Cross-cultural validation of the educational needs assessment tool in RA in 7 European countries. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12, 110. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-110
[17]	Hale, C., Hill, J. and Tennant, A. (2006) The use of RASch analysis in the construct and cross-cultural validation of questionnaire data: An example from the educational needs assessment tool. Annals of Rheumatic Disease, 65, 665.
[18]	Meesters, J.L., Vliet Vlieland, T.M., Hill, J. and Ndosi, M. (2009) Measuring educational needs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis using the Dutch version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (DENAT). Clinical Rheumatology, 28, 1357-1357. doi:10.1007/s10067-009-1271-3
[19]	Grønning, K., Skomsvoll, J.F., Rannestad, T. and Steinsbekk, A. (2012) The effect of an educational programme consisting of group and individual arthritis education for patients with polyarthritis—A randomised controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling, 88, 113-120. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.12.011
[20]	Lorig, K., Chastain, R.L., Ung, E., Shoor, S. and Holman, H.R. (1989) Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 32, 37-44. doi:10.1002/anr.1780320107
[21]	Tugwell, P. and Boers, M. (1993) OMERACT conference on outcome measures in RA clinical trials: Introduction. Journal of Rheumatology, 20, 528-530.
[22]	Tugwell, P., Boers, M., Baker, P. and Snider, J. (1994) Endpoints in rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 21, 2-8.
[23]	Guillemin, F., Coste, J., Pouchot, J., Ghézail, M., Bregeon, C. and Sany, J. (1997) The AIMS2-SF. A short form of the arthritis impact measurement scales 2. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 40, 1267-1274.
[24]	Hennell, S.L., Brownsell, C. and Dawson, J.K. (2004) Development, validation and use of a patient knowledge questionnaire (PKQ) for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology, 43, 467-471. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh069
[25]	Bandura, A. (1977) Self-efficacy; towards a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84, 191- 215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
[26]	Somers, T.J., Shelby, R.A., Keefe, F.J., Godiwala, N., Lumley, M.A., Mosley-Williams, A., Rice, J.R. and Caldwell, D. (2010) Disease severity and domain-specific arthritis self-efficacy: Relationships to pain and functioning in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 62, 848-856. doi:10.1002/acr.20127
[27]	Primdahl, J., Wagner, L. and Hørslev-Petersen, K. (2010) Self-efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: translation and test of validity, reliability and sensitivity of the Danish version of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-Efficacy questionnaire (RASE). Musculoskeletal Care, 8, 123-135. doi:10.1002/msc.172
[28]	Marks, R. (2001) Efficacy theory and its utility in arthritis rehabilitation: Review and recommendations. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 271-280. doi:10.1080/09638280010004162
[29]	Lorig, K., Ritter, P., Laurent, D. and Hobbs, M. (2001) Effect of a self management programme on patients with chronic disease. Effective Clinical Practice, 4, 256-62.
[30]	Brekke, M., Hjortdahl, P. and Kvien, T.K. (2003) Changes in self-efficacy and health status over 5 years: A longitudinal observational study of 306 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 49, 342-348. doi:10.1002/art.11112
[31]	Meenan, R.F., Mason, J.H., Anderson, J.J., Guccione, A.A. and Kazis, L.E. (1992) AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded arthritis impact measurement scales health status questionnaire. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 35, 1-10. doi:10.1002/art.1780350102
[32]	Carr, A. (2003) Adult measures of quality of life: The arthritis impact measurement scales (AIMS/AIMS2), disease repercussion profile (DRP), EuroQoL, nottingham health profile (NHP), patient generated index (PGI), quality of well-being scale (QWB), RAQoL, short form-36 (SF-36), sickness impact profile (SIP), SIP-RA, and world health organization’s quality of life instruments (WHOQoL, WHOQoL-100, WHOQoL-Bref). Arthritis Care & Research, 49, S113-S133. doi:10.1002/art.11414
[33]	Barlow, J.H., Williams, B. and Wright, C. (1997) The reliability and validity of the arthritis self-efficacy scale in a UK context. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 2, 3-17. doi:10.1080/13548509708400556
[34]	Richie, J. and Spencer, L. (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman and Burgess, Eds., Analyzing Qualitative Data, Routledge, London, 173-194. doi:10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_9