Comparative study of interpolation techniques for ultra-tight integration of GPS/INS/PL sensors

Abstract

Ultra-tight architecture plays a key role in improving the robustness of the integrated GPS/INS/PL (Pseudolite) system by aiding GPS receiver’s carrier tracking loops with the Doppler information derived from INS (Inertial Navigation System) velocity measurements. This results in a lower carrier tracking loop bandwidth and subsequent improvement in measurement accuracy. Some other benefits using this architecture include: robust cycle-slip detection and correction, improved antijam performance, and weak signal detection. Typically the integration/navigation filter run at a rate of 1 to 100 Hz, which is insufficient to aid the carrier tracking loop as such loops normally run at about 1000 Hz. Two approaches were envisioned to solve this problem. One approach is to run the navigation Kalman filter at a higher rate, and the other is to run the filter at a lower rate and interpolate the measurements to the required rate. Although the first approach seems to be straightforward, it is computationally very intensive and requires a huge amount of processing power, adding to the cost and complexity of the system. The second method interpolates the low rate Doppler measurements from the navigation filter using multirate signal processing algorithms. Due to its efficiency and simpler architectures the interpolation method is adopted here. Filtering is the key issue when designing interpolators as they remove the images caused in the upsampling process. Although direct form of filtering can be adopted, they increase the computations. To reduce the computational burden, two efficient ways of implementing the interpolators are proposed in this paper: Polyphase and CIC (Cascaded Integrator Comb). The paper summarizes the design and analysis of these two techniques, and our initial results suggest that CIC is relatively better in terms of performance and computational requirements.

Share and Cite:

S. Babu and J. Wang, "Comparative study of interpolation techniques for ultra-tight integration of GPS/INS/PL sensors," Positioning, Vol. 1 No. 9, 2005, pp. -.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Babu R.; Wang J. (2004): Improving the Quality of IMUDerived Doppler Estimates for Ultra-Tight GPS/INS Integration. GNSS 2004, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 16-19 May.
[2] Beser J.; Alexander S.; Crane R.; Rounds S.; Wyman J.; Baeder B. (2002): TrunavTM: A Low-Cost Guidance/Navigation Unit Integrating a SAASM-based GPS and MEMS IMU in a Deeply Coupled Mechanization. 15th Int. Tech. Meeting of the Satellite Division of the U.S. Inst. Of Navigation, Portland, OR, 24-27 September, 545-555.
[3] Crochiere RE.; Rabiner LR. (1983): Multirate Digital Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[4] Farrell, JA.; Barth M. (1999): The Global Positioning System and Inertial Navigation. McGraw-Hill.
[5] Gardner FM. (1993): Interpolation in Digital Modems – Part I: Fundamentals. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-41(3), 501-507.
[6] Hentschel T.; Fettweis G. (2000): Sample Rate Conversion for Software Radio. IEEE Communications Magazine, August, 2-10.
[7] Hogenauer EB. (1981): An Economical Class of Digital Filters for Decimation and Interpolation. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. ASSP-29, 155-162.
[8] Kaplan ED. (1996): Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications. Artech House, MA.
[9] Mitra SK. (1999): Digital Signal Processing – A Computer Based Approach. Tata McGraw-Hill Edition, India, ISBN 0-07-463723-1.
[10] Tsui JBY. (2000): Fundamentals of Global Positioning Receivers – A Software Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[11] Vaidyanathan PP. (1990): Multirate Digital Filter, Filter Banks, Polyphase Networks, and Applications: A Tutorial. Proc. IEEE, 78, 56-93.
[12] Vesma J. (1999): Optimizations and Applications of Polynomial-Based Interpolation Filters. PhD Thesis, Tempere University of Technology, Finland, ISBN 952-15-0206-1.
[13] Wang J.; Dai L.; Tsuiji T.; Rizos C.; Grejner-Brzezinska D.; Toth C. (2001): GPS/INS/Pseudolite Integration: Concepts, Simulation and Testing. 14th Int. Tech. Meeting of the Satellite Division of the U.S. Inst. Of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Ohio, 11-14 September, 2708-2715.
[14] Ward P. (1998): Performance Comparisons Between FLL, PLL and a Novel FLL-Assisted PLL Carrier Tracking Loop Under RF Interference Conditions. 11th Int. Tech. Meeting of the Satellite Division of the U.S. Inst. Of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, 15-18 September, 783-795.
[15] Xilinx. (2003): Digital Up Converter (DUC) DS276 v1.0 Product Specification. (http://www.xilinx.com/ipcenter/catalog/logicore/docs/duc. pdf).

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.