[1]
|
A. Nishimori and H. Ogawa, “Do Firms Always Choose Excess Capacity?” Economics Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2004, pp. 1-7.
|
[2]
|
Y. Horiba and S. Tsutsui, “International Duopoly, Tariff Policies and the Case of Free Trade,” Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2000, pp. 207-220.
doi:10.1111/1468-5876.00147
|
[3]
|
A. Dixit, “The Role of Investment in Entry Deterrence,” Economic Journal, Vol. 90, No. 357, 1980, pp. 95-106.
doi:10.2307/2231658
|
[4]
|
J. A. Brander and B. J. Spencer, “Strategic Commitment with R&D: The Symmetric Case,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1983, pp. 225-235.
doi:10.2307/3003549
|
[5]
|
M. Wen and D. Sasaki, “Would Excess Capacity in Public Firm Be Socially Optimal?” Economic Record, Vol. 77, No. 238, 2001, pp. 283-290.
doi:10.1111/1475-4932.t01-1-00023
|
[6]
|
H. Ogawa, “Capacity Choice in the Mixed Duopoly with Product Differentiation,” Economics Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 8, 2006, pp. 1-6.
|
[7]
|
J. C. Bárcena-Ruiz and M. B. Garzón, “Capacity Choice in a Mixed Duopoly under Price Competition,” Economics Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 26, 2007, pp. 1-7.
|
[8]
|
Y. Lu and S. Poddar, “Mixed Oligopoly and the Choice of Capacity,” Research in Economics, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2005, pp. 365-374. doi:10.1016/j.rie.2005.09.004
|
[9]
|
Y. Lu and S. Poddar, “The Choice of Capacity in Mixed Duopoly under Demand Uncertainty,” Manchester School, Vol. 74, 2006, pp. 266-272.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00492.x
|
[10]
|
Y. Tomaru, Y. Nakamura and M. Saito, “Capacity Choice in a Mixed Duopoly with Managerial Delegation,” Economics Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2009, pp. 1904-1924.
|
[11]
|
C. Fershtman and K. Judd, “Equilibrium Incentives in Oligopoly,” American Economic Review, Vol. 77, No. 5, 1987, pp. 927-940.
|
[12]
|
S. D. Sklivas, “The Strategic Choice of Management Incentives,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1987, pp. 452-458. doi:10.2307/2555609
|
[13]
|
J. Vickers, “Delagation and the Theory of the Firm,” Economic Journal, Vol. 95, 1985, pp. 138-147.
doi:10.2307/2232877
|
[14]
|
Y. Lu and S. Poddar, “Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Duopoly and Private Duopoly—‘Capacity-Then-Quantity’ Game,” Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2009, pp. 138-150.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8454.2009.00369.x
|
[15]
|
J. C. Bárcena-Ruiz and M. B. Garzón, “Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Duopoly with Capacity Choice,” Manchester School, Vol. 78, No. 2, 2010, pp. 93-109.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.2009.02137.x
|
[16]
|
N. Singh and X. Vives, “Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1984, pp. 546-554.
|
[17]
|
X. Vives, “Commitment, Flexibility, and Market Outcomes,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1986, pp. 217-229.
doi:10.1016/0167-7187(86)90032-9
|
[18]
|
T. Matsumura and M. Okamura, “Competition and Privatization Policy: The Relative Performance Approach,” 2010.
|
[19]
|
Y. Nakamura and M. Saito, “Capacity Choice in a Mixed Duopoly: The Relative Performance Approach,” 2013.
|
[20]
|
T. Matsumura and N. Matsushima, “Competitiveness and Stability of Collusive Behavior,” Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 64, No. s1, 2012, pp. s22-s31.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8586.2012.00439.x
|
[21]
|
L. Kockesen, E. A. Ok and R. Sethi, “The Strategic Advantage of Negatively Interdependent Preferences,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 92, No. 2, 2000, pp. 274-299. doi:10.1006/jeth.1999.2587
|
[22]
|
S. W. Joe, “Strategic Managerial Incentive Compensation in Japan: Relative Performance Evaluation and Product Market Collusion,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 81, No. 2, 1999, pp. 303-313.
doi:10.1162/003465399558094
|