Similarities and Differences between Adult and Child Learners as Participants in the Natural Learning Process

Darlene McDonough

School of Education, St. Bonaventure University, New York, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2013.43A050                

Abstract

This paper compares Brian Cambourne’s Conditions of Learning (1988), APA’s Learner-Centered Psychological Principles (1997), and Malcolm Knowles’ Adult Learning Theory (2011). These theories embrace the natural learning process and not the traditional view of learning. The traditional view suggests that the teacher has the knowledge, the learner is dependent on the teacher to disseminate the knowledge and the learner has nothing to contribute. In the natural learning process, knowledge is distributed in a circular and reciprocal way through a collaborative sharing of experiences, centered on real life situations, and learners are responsible for their own learning. In the 21st century knowledge is constantly changing and expanding exponentially. The natural learning process facilitates the life-long learning that is needed to remain a valuable contributor in society where learning has become a collaborative experience.

Keywords

Similarities in Adult and Child Learning; Adult Learning; Child Learning

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Adult Education Centre (2005). Facilitation skills: Working with adult leaders. Dublin: University College. http://www.ucd.ie/adulted/resources/pages/facil_adnrogog.htm
[2]	Alexander, P., & Murphy, P. (1998). The research base for APA’s learner centered psychological principles. In M. Lambert, & B. Combs, (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner centered education. Washington DC: APA.
[3]	APA Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
[4]	APA Task Force on Psychology in Education (1993). Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for school redesign and reform. Washington DC: American Psychological Association and Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
[5]	Biancarose, G., & Snow, C. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. http://www.all4ed.org/publications/ReadingNext/index.html
[6]	Billington, D. (2007). Seven characteristics of adult education/adult learning. http://meetingsnet.com/adult-learning/seven-characteristics-adult-education
[7]	Boycoff B. J. (1998). Using learner centered assessment on a large scale. In N. Lambert, & B. Combs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner centered education. Washington DC: APA.
[8]	Cambourne, B. (1988). The whole story: Natural learning and the acquisition of literacy in the classroom. Jefferson City, MO: Scholastic, Inc.
[9]	Glatthorn, A. A. (2000). The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[10]	Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Androgogy versus pedagogy. New York: New York Association Press.
[11]	Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning. Chicago, IL: Follet.
[12]	Knowles, M. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing.
[13]	Knowles, M. (1984). Andragogy in action. San Francisco, SA: Jossey-Bass.
[14]	Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2011). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (7th ed.). New York: Elsevier Inc.
[15]	Lieb, S. (1991). Principles of adult learning. Phoenix, AZ: Vision-South Mountain Community College. http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/teachtip/adults-2.htm(& 1.htm)
[16]	Mentkowski, M. (1998). Higher education assessment and national goals for education: Issues, assumptions, and principles. In N. Lambert, & B. Combs, (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner centered education. Washington DC: APA.
[17]	O’Brien, G. (2004). Principles of adult learning. Melbourne: Southern Health Organization. http://www.southernhealth.org.au/cpme/articles/adult_learning.htm
[18]	Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition. In Resnick, Levine, & Teasley (Eds), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington DC: APA.
[19]	Richardson, V. (2005). The diverse learning needs of students. In D. M. Billings, & J. A. Halstead (Eds.), Teaching in nursing (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
[20]	Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
[21]	Smith, M. K. (2002) Malcolm Knowles, informal adult education, self-direction and andragogy. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education. http://www.infed.org/thinkers/et-knowl.htm
[22]	Tagliamont, S., & Derek, D. (2006). LOI for real! Instant messaging, teen language and linguistic change. The Annual forum of the Linguistics Association of Canada and the United States (LACUS33), Toronto, ON.
[23]	Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
[24]	Zemke, R., & Zemke, S. (1995). Adult learning: What do we know for sure? http://www.msstate.edu/dept/ais/8523/Zemke1995.pdf