Poverty Assessment in Terms of Safe Drinking Water, Hygiene Facilities, and Energy of Minority Nationalities————A Case Study on the A Ba Autonomous Prefecture of Tibetan and Qiang Nationalities

Abstract

Since 2002, the Trinity Mode has been adopted in China to include safe drinking water and sanitation services in order to change the services into public products of rural communities. These products would contain multi-valued attributes of miniature infrastructure constructions, primary health care, and ecological protection. Poverty reduction demands different policies with extended connotation and changed features, from increasing income to improving welfare services, from a macroscopic to a microscopic viewpoint, from the national level to that of communities, and from the indistinguishable to an individual. Against such background, A Ba Prefecture is selected as the case study area. Safe drinking water and sanitation services, the most important components of basic public health services, are selected as the research object in the study, and both sanitation and health are included in the framework to analyze poverty. Altogether, 5637 valid questionnaires of “The Investigation on Poverty Alleviation in A Ba Prefecture in2009”have been carefully studied. The study shows that great achievements have been made in alleviating poverty in A Ba by improving the drinking water in rural areas. However, a huge amount of work is needed to apply hygiene facilities and popularize clean energy. Hence, the government’s antipoverty policies should be strengthened in the latter two aspects.

Share and Cite:

Wang, S., Zhou, X., Wang, X. & Shao, Z. (2013). Poverty Assessment in Terms of Safe Drinking Water, Hygiene Facilities, and Energy of Minority Nationalities————A Case Study on the A Ba Autonomous Prefecture of Tibetan and Qiang Nationalities. Chinese Studies, 2, 61-67. doi: 10.4236/chnstd.2013.21009.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Bennett, L., & Gajurel, K. (2007). Change, gender, and ethnic dimensions of empowerment and social inclusion in rural Nepal (nonmember draft). Kathmandu: World Bank, 2007.
[2] Chen, L.-Z. (2008). Analysis of the trends of urban poverty and its influence factor during Chinese transition. Studies on China’s Special Economic Zones, 5, 5-9.
[3] Chen, M., Zhang, L.-X., Zai, Y.-L., & Luo, R.-F. (2005). Region distributing of investment in drinking water in rural China. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 5, 340-343.
[4] Das Gupta, M. et al. (2009). How can donors help building global public goods in health? The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4907, 2009.
[5] Data sources: The web portals of the government of A Ba prefecture. URL (last checked 21 June 2009). www.abazhou.gov.cn
[6] Fenwick, M., Subedi, S. P., & Hutton, G. (2007). A cost-benefit analysis of national and regional integrated biogas and sanitation pro- grams in sub-Saharan Africa. Winrock International.
[7] Hu, A.-G., Tong, X.-G., & Zhu, D.-D. (2005). The measurement of four classes of poverty: A case study on the poverty relief in Qinghai province (1978-2007). Hunan Social Sciences, 5, 45-52.
[8] Hutton, G., & Bartram, J. (2007). Global cost-benefit analysis of water supply and sanitation interventions. Journal of Water and Health, 5, 481-502.
[9] Li, B., Li, X.-Y., & Zuo, T. (2004). Research and practice of livelihood approach in rural development. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 4, 1-6.
[10] Li, X.-Y., Dong, Q., Rao, X.-L., & Zhao, L.-X. (2007). The analytical method of peasants’ vulnerabilities and its localization, Chinese Rural Economy, 4.
[11] Li, X.-Y., Li, Z. et al. (2005). The development and verification of participatory poverty index. Chinese Rural Economy, 5, 39-46.
[12] National Center for Rural Water Supply Technical Guidance (28 March 2006). Safe drinking water and sanitation for the rural poor final report. Metcalf & Eddy Ltd., 5.
[13] National Center for Rural Water Supply Technical Guidance (28 March 2006). Safe drinking water and sanitation for the rural poor final report. Metcalf & Eddy Ltd., ES-p.1
[14] Office of Rural Water Supply and Environmental Sanitation, the Ministry of Water Resources (1995). Cooperative project of water supply and environmental sanitation of China/UNICEF. The Special Issue in Memory of the 50th Anniversary of the Foundation of the United Nations, 47-49.
[15] Paul, R., Kathy, H., Paul, P., & Cameron, J. J. (2009). An assessment of the costs and benefits of interventions aimed at improving rural community water supplies in developed countries. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 3081-3085.
[16] Peter, H. (2008). Poverty reduction strategies: Opportunities and threats for sustainable rural water services in sub-saharan Africa. New York: SAGE Publications
[17] Ruth, A., & Nina, H. (2005). Measuring empowerment in practice: Structuring analysis and framing indicators. Policy Research Working Paper No. 3510 of the World Bank, 2005.
[18] The Survey Team of National Conditions (2009). Vulnerability and poverty: Empirical analysis of village LI in Jiangsu province. Modern Economic Research, 7, 44-47.
[19] Yunus, & Bao, X.-J. (2008). Social business and the future of capitalism: Creating a world without poverty. Beijing: China Citic Press, 2008.
[20] Zhu, L. (2004). The relationship between public service supply and the lessening of poverty at in grass-root units in Tibetan agricultural and pastoral areas. Management World, 4, 41-50.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.