A Proposed Mediated Path between Gender and Posttraumatic Growth: The Roles of Empathy and Social Support in a Mixed-Age Sample

Abstract

Social support coping has been shown to mediate the relationship between gender and posttraumatic growth. This study examined whether empathy also serves as a significant mediator in this relationship, potentially as a precursor to social support coping. Participants (N = 156) were recruited on a college campus and at a retirement community. They completed questionnaires that assessed the variables of interest and they provided information regarding a stressful life event. Single-mediator path analytic models indicated that both empathy and social support were significant mediators. The full multiplicative mediational path from gender to empathy to support to growth was significant, but this finding was largely driven by the strong mediational effect of empathy. These findings suggest that although both empathy and social support coping are significant mediators in the relationship between gender and stress related growth, of the two constructs, empathy appears to exert a stronger mediational effect.

Share and Cite:

Swickert, R. , Hittner, J. & Foster, A. (2012). A Proposed Mediated Path between Gender and Posttraumatic Growth: The Roles of Empathy and Social Support in a Mixed-Age Sample. Psychology, 3, 1142-1147. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.312A168.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Amirkahn, J. (1990). A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The Coping Strategy Indicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1066-1074. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1066
[2] Batson, C. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psycho logical answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[3] Bellizzi, K. (2004). Expressions of generativity and posttraumatic growth in adult cancer survivors. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 58, 267-287. doi:10.2190/DC07-CPVW-4UVE-5GK0
[4] Bellizzi, K., & Blank, T. (2006). Predicting posttraumatic growth in breast cancer survivors. Health Psychology, 25, 47-56. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.47
[5] Cadell, S., Regehr, C., & Hemsworth, D. (2003). Factors contributing to posttraumatic growth: A proposed structural equation model. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 73, 279-287. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.73.3.279
[6] Carter, C., Harris, J., & Porges, S. (2009). Neural and evolutionary perspectives on empathy. In J. Decety, & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 169-182). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[7] Chakrabarti, B., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). Empathizing: Neurocognitive developmental mechanisms and individual differences. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 403-417. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56022-4
[8] Cramer, D. (2003). Facilitativeness, conflict, demand for approval, self-esteem, and satisfaction with romantic relationships. The Journal of Psychology, 137, 85-98. doi:10.1080/00223980309600601
[9] Cryder, C., Kilmer, R., Tedeschi, R., & Calhoun, L. (2006). An exploratory study of posttraumatic growth in children following a natural disaster. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 65-69. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.76.1.65
[10] Davis, M. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: Westview Press.
[11] Davis, M., & Oathout, H. (1987). Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and relational competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 397-410. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.397
[12] De Wied, M., Branje, S., & Meeus, W. (2007). Empathy and conflict resolution in friendship relations among adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 48-55. doi:10.1002/ab.20166
[13] Eagly, A., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283-308. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283
[14] Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
[15] Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408-420. doi:10.1080/03637750903310360
[16] Hayes, A. F., Preacher, K. J., & Myers, T. A. (2011). Mediation and the estimation of indirect effects in political communication research. In E. P. Bucy, & R. L. Holbert (Eds.), Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, measures and analytical techniques (pp. 434-465). New York: Routledge.
[17] Hittner, J. B., & Swickert, R. J. (2001). Modeling functional and structural social support via confirmatory factor analysis: Evidence for a second-order global support construct. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 69-80.
[18] Ickes, W., Gesn, P., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95-109.
[19] Lawrence, E., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34, 911-919. doi:10.1017/S0033291703001624
[20] Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004). Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 11-21. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000014671.27856.7e
[21] MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181. doi:10.1023/A:1026595011371
[22] McMillen, J. C., & Fisher, R. H. (1998). The perceived benefit scale: Measuring perceived positive life changes after negative events. Social Work Research, 22, 173-187. doi:10.1093/swr/22.3.173
[23] McWhirter, B., Besett-Alesch, T., Horibata, J., & Gat, I. (2002). Loneliness in high risk adolescents: The role of coping, self-esteem, and empathy. Journal of Youth Studies, 5, 69-84. doi:10.1080/13676260120111779
[24] Muncer, S., & Ling, J. (2006). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient scale (EQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1111-1119. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.020
[25] Neff, L., & Karney, B. (2005). Gender differences in social support: A question of skill or responsiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 79-90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.79
[26] O’Brien, T., DeLongis, A., Pomaki, G., Puterman, E., & Zwicker, A. (2009). Couples coping with stress: The role of empathic responding. European Psychologist, 14, 18-28. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.18
[27] Park, C., Cohen, L., & Murch, R. (1996). Assessment and prediction of stress-related growth. Journal of Personality, 64, 71-105. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00815.x
[28] Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
[29] Putallaz, M., Hellstern, L., Sheppard, B. L., Grimes, C. L., & Glodis, K. A. (1995). Conflict, social competence, and gender: Maternal and peer contexts. Early Education and Development, 6, 433-447. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed0604_8
[30] Salo, J., Qouta, S., & Punam?ki, R. (2005). Adult attachment, posttraumatic growth and negative emotions among former political prisoners. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 18, 361-378. doi:10.1080/10615800500289524
[31] Schultz, J., Tallman, B., & Altmaier, E. (2010). Pathways to posttraumatic growth: The contributions of forgiveness and importance of religion and spirituality. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2, 104-114. doi:10.1037/a0018454
[32] Shirtcliff, E., Vitacco, M., Graf, A., Gostisha, A., Merz, J., & Zahn Waxler, C. (2009). Neurobiology of empathy and callousness: Implications for the development of antisocial behavior. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 137-171. doi:10.1002/bsl.862
[33] Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
[34] Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R., & Frith, C. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157-1162. doi:10.1126/science.1093535
[35] Staub, E., & Vollhardt, M. (2008). Altruism born of suffering: The roots of caring and helping after victimization and other trauma. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78, 267-280. doi:10.1037/a0014223
[36] Sullivan, K., Pasch, L., Johnson, M., & Bradbury, T. (2010). Social support, problem solving, and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 631 644. doi:10.1037/a0017578
[37] Swickert, R., DeRoma, V. M., & Saylor, C. F. (2004). The relationship between gender and trauma symptoms: A proposed mediational model. Individual Differences Research, 2, 203-213.
[38] Swickert, R. J., & Hittner, J. B. (2009). Social support coping mediates the relationship between gender and posttraumatic growth. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 387-393. doi:10.1177/1359105308101677
[39] Taylor, S., Klein, L., Lewis, B., Gruenwald, T., Gurung, R., & Updegraff, J. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not flight-or-fight. Psychological Review, 107, 411-429. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411
[40] Tedeschi, R., & Calhoun, L. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1-18. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
[41] Toi, M., & Batson, C. (1982). More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 281-292. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.281
[42] Vishnevsky, T., Cann, A., Calhoun, L., Tedeshi, R., & Demakis, G. (2010). Gender differences in self-reported posttraumatic growth: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 110-120. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01546.x
[43] Walker, S. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between young children’s peer-related social competence and individual differences in theory of mind. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166, 297-312. doi:10.3200/GNTP.166.3.297-312
[44] Widows, M., Jacobsen, P., Booth-Jones, M., & Fields, K. (2005). Predictors of posttraumatic growth following bone marrow transplantation for cancer. Health Psychology, 24, 266-273. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.266
[45] Woike, B., & Matic, D. (2004). Cognitive complexity in response to traumatic experiences. Journal of Personality, 72, 633-657. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00275.x

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.