Prevalence of cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer disease-like pattern in atypical dementias

A. Padovani, A. Benussi, F. Ferrari, S. Archetti, B. Borroni

Neurology Unit, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

DOI: 10.4236/aad.2012.13006                

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis between Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), Corticobasal Syndrome (CBS), Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Syndrome (PSP), FTD with motor neuron disease (FTD-MND) is often challenging, because of the occurrence of atypical cases. Autopsy series have identified Alzheimer Disease (AD) pathology in a consistent percentage of patients with atypical dementias. It has been demonstrated that Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Tau/Aβ₄₂ dosage is a reliable marker for AD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presence and percentage of CSF AD-like patterns (high CSF tau/Aβ₄₂ ratio) in patients with atypical dementias in order to identify an ongoing AD neurodegenerative process. METHODS: One hundred seventy two consecutive patients fulfilling current clinical criteria for behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD, n = 73), agrammatic variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (avPPA, n = 19), semantic variant of PPA (svPPA, n = 12), FTD-MND (n = 5), CBS (n = 42), PSP (n = 21) were recruited and underwent CSF analysis. CSF AD-like and non AD (nAD-like) patterns were identified. RESULTS: CSF AD-like pattern was reported in 6 out of 73 cases (8.2%) in the bvFTD group, in 3 out of 19 (15.8%) in the avPPA group, and in 7 out of 42 (16.7%) in the CBS group. One out of 12 (8.3%) of svPPA had CSF AD-like pattern. None of patients FTD-MND and PSP had CSF AD-like pattern. No differences in demographic characteristics were detected between subgroups in each phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings convey that the CSF tau/ Aβ₄₂ ratio could be found in a proportion of cases with clinical bvFTD, avPPA and CBD. Detecting anon-going AD pathological process in atypical dementias has several implications for defining distinctive therapeutic approaches, guiding genetic screening and helping in patients’ selection in future clinical trials.

Keywords

CSF; Alzheimer Disease; Atypical Dementias; Frontotemporal Dementia; Corticobasal Syndrome; Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Rohrer, J.D., Lashley, T., Schott, J.M., et al. (2011) Clinical and neuroanatomical signatures of tissue pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Brain, 134, 2565-2581. doi:10.1093/brain/awr198
[2]	Rascovsky, K., Hodges, J.R., Knopman, D., et al. (2011) Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain, 134, 2456-2477. doi:10.1093/brain/awr179
[3]	Lopez, O.L., Becker, J.T., Klunk, W., et al. (2000) Research evaluation and diagnosis of probable Alzheimer’s disease over the last two decades: I. Neurology, 55, 1854- 1862. doi:10.1212/WNL.55.12.1854
[4]	Cummings, J.L. (2000) Cognitive and behavioral heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease: Seeking the neurobiological basis. Neurobiology of Aging, 21, 845-861. doi:10.1016/S0197-4580(00)00183-4
[5]	Kertesz, A., McMonagle, P., Blair, M., et al. (2005) The evolution and pathology of frontotemporal dementia. Brain, 128, 1996-2005. doi:10.1093/brain/awh598
[6]	Forman, M.S., Farmer, J., Johnson, J.K., et al. (2006) Frontotemporal dementia: Clinicopathological correlations. Annals of Neurology, 59, 952-962. doi:10.1002/ana.20873
[7]	Visser, P.J., Verhey, F., Knol, D.L., et al. (2009) Prevalence and prognostic value of CSF markers of Alzheimer’s disease pathology in patients with subjective cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment in the DESCRIPA study: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet Neurology, 8, 619-627. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70139-5
[8]	Mattsson, N., Zetterberg, H., Hansson, O., et al. (2009) CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 302, 385-393. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1064
[9]	Tapiola, T., Alafuzoff, I., Herukka, S.-K., et al. (2009) Cerebrospinal fluid {beta}-amyloid 42 and tau proteins as biomarkers of Alzheimer-type pathologic changes in the brain. Archives of Neurology, 66, 382-389. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2008.596
[10]	Premi, E., Garibotto, V., Alberici, A., et al. (2012) Nature versus nurture in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: the interaction of genetic background and education on brain damage. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 33, 372-378. doi:10.1159/000339366
[11]	Bian, H., Van Swieten, J.C., Leight, S., et al. (2008) CSF biomarkers in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with known pathology. Neurology, 70, 1827-1835.
[12]	Seelaar, H., Rohrer, J.D., Pijnenburg, Y.A.L., et al. (2011) Clinical, genetic and pathological heterogeneity of frontotemporal dementia: A review. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 82, 476-486. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2010.212225
[13]	Davies, R.R., Hodges, J.R., Kril, J.J., et al. (2005) The pathological basis of semantic dementia. Brain, 128, 1984- 1995. doi:10.1093/brain/awh582
[14]	Grossman, M. (2010) Primary progressive aphasia: Clinicopathological correlations. Nature Reviews. Neurology, 6, 88-97. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2009.216
[15]	Mesulam, M., Wicklund, A., Johnson, N., et al. (2008) Alzheimer and frontotemporal pathology in subsets of primary progressive aphasia. Annals of Neurology, 63, 709- 719. doi:10.1002/ana.21388
[16]	Deramecourt, V., Lebert, F., Debachy, B., et al. (2010) Prediction of pathology in primary progressive language and speech disorders. Neurology, 74, 42-49. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c7198e
[17]	Cairns, N.J., Bigio, E.H., Mackenzie, I.R., et al. (2007) Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: Consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Acta Neuropathologica, 114, 5-22. doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0237-2
[18]	Sampathu, D.M., Neumann, M., Kwong, L.K., et al. (2006) Pathological heterogeneity of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions delineated by ubiquitin immunohistochemistry and novel monoclonal antibodies. The American Journal of Pathology, 169, 1343-1352. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2006.060438
[19]	Verwey, N.A., Kester, M.I., van der Flier, W.M., et al. (2010) Additional value of CSF amyloid-beta 40 levels in the differentiation between FTLD and control subjects. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 20, 445-452.
[20]	Urakami, K., Wada, K., Arai, H., et al. (2001) Diagnostic significance of tau protein in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with corticobasal degeneration or progressive supranuclear palsy. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 183, 95-98. doi:10.1016/S0022-510X(00)00480-9
[21]	Paraskevas, G.P. (2005) The diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid tau protein in sementing and nondementing neuropsychiatric disorders. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 18, 163-173. doi:10.1177/0891988705277549
[22]	Arai, H., Morikawa, Y., Higuchi, M., et al. (1997) Cerebrospinal fluid tau levels in neurodegenerative diseases with distinct tau-related pathology. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 236, 262-264. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1997.6908
[23]	Noguchi, M., Yoshita, M., Matsumoto, Y., et al. (2005) Decreased beta-amyloid peptide42 in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 237, 61-65. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2005.05.015
[24]	Sha, S., Hou, C., Viskontas, I.V., et al. (2006) Are frontotemporal lobar degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration distinct diseases? Nature Clinical Practice. Neurology, 2, 658-665. doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0357
[25]	Chand, P., Grafman, J., Dickson, D., et al. (2006) Alzheimer’s disease presenting as corticobasal syndrome. Movement Disorders, 21, 2018-2022. doi:10.1002/mds.21055
[26]	Boeve, B.F., Lang, A.E. and Litvan, I. (2003) Corticobasal degeneration and its relationship to progressive supranuclear palsy and frontotemporal dementia. Annals of Neurology, 54, S15-S19. doi:10.1002/ana.10570
[27]	Lang, A.E. (2003) Corticobasal degeneration: Selected developments. Movement Disorders, 18, S51-S56. doi:10.1002/mds.10563
[28]	Dickson, D.W. (2012) Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism: Neuropathology. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 2, a009258.
[29]	Borroni, B., Malinverno, M., Gardoni,F., et al. (2008) Tau forms in CSF as a reliable biomarker for progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology, 71, 1796-1803. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000335941.68602.39
[30]	Dubois, B., Feldman, H.H., Jacova, C., et al. (2007) Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. The Lancet Neurology, 6, 734-746. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70178-3
[31]	Hu, W.T., Rippon, G.W., Boeve, B.F., et al. (2009) Alzheimer’s disease and corticobasal degeneration presenting as corticobasal syndrome. Movement Disorders, 24, 1375- 1379. doi:10.1002/mds.22574
[32]	Grossman, M., Libon, D.J., Forman, M.S., et al. (2007) Distinct antemortem profiles in patients with pathologically defined frontotemporal dementia. Archives of Neurology, 64, 1601-1609. doi:10.1001/archneur.64.11.1601
[33]	Jellinger, K.A. and Attems, J. (2010) Prevalence of dementia disorders in the oldest-old: An autopsy study. Acta Neuropathology, 119, 421-433. doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0654-5
[34]	Cohen, A.D., Rabinovici, G.D., Mathis, C.A., et al. (2012) Using pittsburgh compound B for in vivo PET imaging of fibrillar amyloid-beta. Advances in Pharmacology, 64, 27-81. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-394816-8.00002-7