[1]
|
Akdemir, O., & Koszalka, T. (2008). Investigating the relationships among instructional strategies and learning styles in online environments. Computers & Education, 50, 1451-1461.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.004
|
[2]
|
Alharbi, A., Paul, D., Henskens, F., & Hannaford, M. (2011). An investigation into the learning styles and self-regulated learning strategies for computer science students. In Proceedings Ascilite 2011 (36-46). Hobart: Ascilite.
|
[3]
|
Allert, J. (2004). Learning style and factors contributing to success in an introductory computer science course. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 385-389). Charlotte: SIGCSE. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357442
|
[4]
|
Ben-Ari, M., Berglund, A., Booth, S., & Holmboe, C. (2004). What do we mean by theoretically sound research in computer science education? Proceedings of the 9th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 230-231). New York, NY: ACM.
|
[5]
|
Benaya, T., & Zur, E. (2008). Understanding object oriented programming concepts in an advanced programming course. Informatics Education—Supporting Computational Thinking, 5090, 161-170.
doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69924-8_15
|
[6]
|
Berglund, A., Eckerdal, A., Pears, A., East, P., Kinnunen, P., Malmi, L. et al. (2009). Learning computer science: Perceptions, actions and roles. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34, 327-338.
doi:10.1080/03043790902989168
|
[7]
|
Bruning, R., Schraw, G., & Ronning, R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
|
[8]
|
Chamillard, A., & Karolick, D. (1999). Using learning style data in an introductory computer science course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 31, 291-295. doi:10.1145/384266.299790
|
[9]
|
Coffield, F. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
|
[10]
|
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Should we be using learning styles. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
|
[11]
|
De Raadt, M., & Simon (2011). My students don’t learn the way I do. Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2011) (pp. 105-112). Perth: Australian Computer Society, Inc.
|
[12]
|
Dettori, G., & Persico, D. (2008). Detecting self-regulated learning in online communities by means of interaction analysis. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1, 11-19.
doi:10.1109/TLT.2008.7
|
[13]
|
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering education, 78, 674-681.
|
[14]
|
Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (1997). Index of learning styles. URL (last checked 20 June 2011).
http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSpage.html
|
[15]
|
Fjuk, A., Bennedsen, J., Berge, O., & Caspersen, M. E. (2004). Learning object-orientation through ICT-mediated apprenticeship. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 380-384). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357441
|
[16]
|
Fleury, A. E. (2001). Encapsualtion and reuse as viewed by java students. URL.
http://dis.eafit.edu.co/depto/documentos/p189-fleury%20-%20Encapsulation%20and%20Reuse%20as%20Viewed%20by%20Java%20Stu dents.pdf
|
[17]
|
Hadar, I., & Leron, U. (2008). How intuitive is object-oriented design? Communications of the ACM, 51, 41-46.
doi:10.1145/1342327.1342336
|
[18]
|
Holland, S., Griffiths, R., & Woodman, M. (1997). Avoiding object misconceptions. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 29, 131-134.
doi:10.1145/268085.268132
|
[19]
|
Holmboe, C., McIver, L., & George, C. (2001). Research agenda for computer science education. In Proceedings of PPIG (pp. 207-223). Bournemouth: 13th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group.
|
[20]
|
IEEE/ACM (2005). Computing curricula 2005: The overview report. URL (last checked 20 June 2011).
http://www.acm.org/education/education/curric_vols/CC2005-March06Final.pdf
|
[21]
|
Keefe, J. W. (1988). Profiling and utilizing learning style. Reston, VA: NASSP Learning Style Series.
|
[22]
|
Liberman, N., Beeri, C., & Ben-David Kolikant, Y. (2011). Difficulties in learning inheritance and polymorphism. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 11, 4.
doi:10.1145/1921607.1921611
|
[23]
|
LTSC (2002). Draft standard for learning object metadata. URL (last checked 4 July 2011).
http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf
|
[24]
|
Mills, J., Ayre, M., Hands, D., & Carden, P. (2010). Learning about learning styles: Can it improve engineering education? Mountain Rise, 2, 16.
|
[25]
|
Milne, I., & Rowe, G. (2002). Difficulties in learning and teaching programming—Views of students and tutors. Education and Information Technologies, 7, 55-66. doi:10.1023/A:1015362608943
|
[26]
|
Or-Bach, R., & Lavy, I. (2004). Cognitive activities of abstraction in object orientation: An empirical study. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36, 82-86. doi:10.1145/1024338.1024378
|
[27]
|
Pintrich, P., & Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective, 3, 731-810. doi:10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_16
|
[28]
|
Pritchard, A. (2009). Ways of learning: Learning theories and learning styles in the classroom (2nd ed.). London: David Fulton Publishers.
|
[29]
|
Ragonis, N., & Ben-Ari, M. (2005a). A long-term investigation of the comprehension of OOP concepts by novices. Computer Science Education, 15, 203-221
|
[30]
|
Ragonis, N., & Ben-Ari, M. (2005b). On understanding the statics and dynamics of object-oriented programs. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37, 226-230.
|
[31]
|
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing. Instructional-Design Theories and Models, 2, 5-29.
|
[32]
|
Sahami, M., Guzdial, M., McGettrick, A., & Roach, S. (2011). Setting the stage for computing curricula 2013: Computer science—Report from the ACM/IEEE-CS joint task force. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (161- 162). New York, NY: ACM.
|
[33]
|
Sosteric, M., & Hesemeier, S. (2002). When is a learning object not an object: A first step towards a theory of learning objects. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3, 2.
|
[34]
|
Thagard (Ed.) (2010). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
|
[35]
|
Thomas, L., Ratcliffe, M., Woodbury, J., & Jarman, E. (2002). Learning styles and performance in the introductory programming sequence. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, 33-37. doi:10.1145/563517.563352
|
[36]
|
Watson, J. (1997). Behaviorism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
|
[37]
|
Weinstein, C. E., & Acee, T. W. (2008). Cognitive view of learning. In N. Salkind, & K. Rasmussen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational psychology. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
|
[38]
|
Wiley, D. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. Learning Technology, 2830, 1-35.
|
[39]
|
Wiley, D. (2002). Learning objects need instructional design theory. In A. Rossett (Ed.), The ASTD e-Learning Handbook (pp. 115-126). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
|
[40]
|
Wiley, D., Waters, S., Dawson, D., Lambert, B., Barclay, M., Wade, D., et al. (2004). Overcoming the limitations of learning objects. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 507-521.
|
[41]
|
Zander, C., Thomas, L., Simon, B., Murphy, L., McCauley, R., Hanks, B. et al. (2009). Learning styles: Novices decide. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41, 223-227.
|