Comparison of the S-, N- or P-Deprivations’ Impacts on Stomatal Conductance, Transpiration and Photosynthetic Rate of Young Maize Leaves

Dimitris L. Bouranis, Styliani N. Chorianopoulou, Alexandros Dionias, Giouli Sofianou, Aristotelis Thanasoulas, Georgios Liakopoulos, Dimosthenis Nikolopoulos

Plant Physiology Laboratory, Division of Plant Biology, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece..

DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2012.38126                

Abstract

Seven-day-old maize (Zea mays) plants were grown hydroponically for ten days in deprived nutrient solutions against the corresponding control grown under full nutrition; the effects of S-, N- or P-deprivation on laminas’ mean stomatal conductance (g_s), transpiration rate (E) and photosynthetic rate (A) were monitored, along with the impact on the laminas’ total dry mass (DM), water amount (W), length and surface area (S_a). Furthermore, a time series analysis of each parameter’s response ratios (Rr), i.e. the treatment’s value divided by the corresponding control’s one, was performed. Under S-deprivation, the Rr of laminas’ mean g_s, E, and A presented oscillations within a ±15% fluctuation zone, notably the “control” zone, whilst those of laminas’ total DM, water amount, surface area, and length included oscillation during the first days and deviation later on, presenting deviation during d10. Under the N-deprivation conditions all Rr time courses except the A one, included early deviations from the control zone without recovering. The deviation from the control zone appeared at d4. Under P-deprivation, all Rr time courses represented oscillations within the control zone. P-deprivation’s patterns resembled those of S-deprivation. Compared to the one of the S-deprivation, the P-one’s oscillations took place within a broader zone. Linear relationships among the various Rr patterns were found between g_s-E, g_s-A, E-A, DM-W and DM-S_a. In conclusion, the impact of P-deprivation appeared in an early stage and included an alleviation action, the one of N-deprivation appeared early with no alleviation action, whilst that of S-deprivation appeared later, being rather weaker when compared to the impact of the P-deprivation’s impact.

Keywords

S-Deprivation; N-Deprivation; P-Deprivation; Hydroponics; Zea Mays; Stomatal Conductance; Transpiration Rate; Photosynthetic Rate; Response Ratios; Fluctuation Analysis

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	A. Amtmann and P. Armengaud, “Effects of N, P, K and S on Metabolism: New Knowledge Gained from Multi-Level Analysis,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2009, pp. 275-283. Hdoi:10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.014
[2]	D. T. Clarkson, M. Carvajal, T. Henzler, R. N. Waterhouse, A. J. Smyth, D. T. Cooke and E. Steudle, “Root Hydraulic Conductance: Diurnal Aquaporin Expression and the Effects of Nutrient Stress,” Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 51, No. 342, 2000, pp. 61-70. Hdoi:10.1093/jexbot/51.342.61
[3]	J. W. Radin, “Responses of Transpiration and Hydraulic Conductance to Root Temperature in Nitrogen- and Phosphorus-Deficient Cotton Seedlings,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 92, No. 3, 1990, pp. 855-857. Hdoi:10.1104/pp.92.3.855
[4]	E. J. Ward, R. Oren, D. Bjarn, B. D. Sigurdsson, P. G. Jarvis and S. Linder, “Fertilization Effects on Mean Stomatal Conductance Are Mediated through Changes in the Hydraulic Attributes of Mature Norway Spruce Trees,” Tree Physiology, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2008, pp. 579-596. Hdoi:10.1093/treephys/28.4.579
[5]	T. Eichert, J. J. Peguero-Pina, E. Gil-Pelegrín, A. Heredia and V. Fernández, “Effects of Iron Chlorosis and Iron Resupply on Leaf Xylem Architecture, Water Elations, Gas Exchange and Stomatal Performance of Field-Grown Peach (Prunus persica),” Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 138, No. 1, 2010, pp. 48-59. Hdoi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01295.x
[6]	A. J. S. McDonald and W. J. Davies, “Keeping in Touch: Responses of the Whole Plant to Deficits in Water and Nitrogen Supply,” Advances in Botanical Research, Vol. 22, 1996, pp. 229-300. Hdoi:10.1016/S0065-2296(08)60059-2
[7]	S. Wilkinson, M. A. Z. Bacon and W. J. Davies, “Nitrate Signalling to Stomata and Growing Leaves: Interactions with Soil Drying, ABA, and Xylem Sap pH in Maize,” Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 58, No. 7, 2007, pp. 1705-1716. Hdoi:10.1093/jxb/erm021
[8]	P. Battal, M. Turker and B. Tileklioglu, “Effects of Different Mineral Nutrients on Abscisic Acid in Maize (Zea mays),” Annales Botanici Fennici, Vol. 40, 2003, pp. 301-308.
[9]	P. Marschner, “Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants,” 3rd Edition, Elsevier, 2012, p. 101.
[10]	C. Maurel, L. Verdoucq, D.-T. Luu and V. Santoni, “Plant Aquaporins: Membrane Channels with Multiple Integrated Functions,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, Vol. 59, 2008, pp. 595-624. Hdoi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092734
[11]	G. D. Farquhal, T. N. Buckley and J. M. Miller, “Optimal Stomatal Control in Relation to Leaf Area and Nitrogen,” Silva Fennica, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2002, pp. 625-637.
[12]	M. D. Cramer, H.-J. Hawkins and G. A. Verboom, “The Importance of Nutritional Regulation of Plant Water Flux,” Oecologia, Vol. 161, No. 1, 2009, pp. 15-24. Hdoi:10.1007/s00442-009-1364-3
[13]	S. Wilkinson and W. J. Davies, “ABA-Based Chemical Signalling: The Co-Ordination of Responses to Stress in Plants,” Plant, Cell & Environment, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2002, pp. 195-210. Hdoi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00824.x
[14]	E. Brewitz, C.-M. Larsson and M. Larsson, “Influence of Nitrate Supply on Concentrations and Translocation of Abscisic Acid in Barley (Hordeum vulgare),” Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 95, No. 4, 1995, pp. 499-506. Hdoi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb05515.x
[15]	J. W. Radin, L. L. Parker and G. Guinn, “Water Relations of Cotton Plants under Nitrogen Deficiency. V. Environmental Control of Abscisic Acid Accumulation and Stomatal Sensitivity to Abscisic Acid,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 70, No. 4, 1982, pp. 1066-1070. Hdoi:10.1104/pp.70.4.1066