Problem of Standardization of Configuration Data in Wireless Sensor Networks: The Case of Routing Protocols

Abstract

The exploitation of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) is constrained by limited power, low computing power and storage and short-range radio transmission. Many routing protocols respecting these constraints were developed but, it still lacks formal and standardized solutions being able to help in their configuration. The configuration management that responds to this concern is very important in this type of network. It consists of the definition of data models to configure and is very necessary for the good network performance. Tangible results were obtained in traditional networks with the emergence of NETCONF and YANG standards, but on the best of our humble knowledge there are none yet in WSNs. We propose in this paper wsn-routing-protocol, a YANG data model for routing protocols configuration in WSNs. Following our model, we propose two YANG configuration data models based on the latter: they are respectively aodv for AODV and rpl for RPL.

Share and Cite:

T. Ndie and J. Noutat, "Problem of Standardization of Configuration Data in Wireless Sensor Networks: The Case of Routing Protocols," Wireless Sensor Network, Vol. 4 No. 7, 2012, pp. 177-184. doi: 10.4236/wsn.2012.47026.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Y. Khenfouci and A. Badaoui, “Authentication Approach in Wireless Sensor Networks for the Pedagogy,” End of Studies Thesis in Computer Science, 2009.
[2] K. Beydoun, “Design of Hierarchical Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network,” Ph.D. Thesis, UFR Des Sciences Et Techniques De L’Université De Franche-Comté, Besan?on, 2009.
[3] M. Bjorklund, “YANG—A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF),” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Request for Comments: 6020, October 2010.
[4] R. Enns, M. Bjorklund, J. Schoenwaelder and A. Bierman, “NETCONF Configuration Protocol,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 6241, June 2011.
[5] M. Rose and K. McCloghrie, “Structure and Identification of Management Information for TCP/IP-based internets,” Request for Comments: 1155, May 1990.
[6] J. Schoenwaelder, “Common YANG Data Types,” RFC 6021, October 2010.
[7] http://www.netconfcentral.org/modules/ietf-inet-types
[8] C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer and S. Das, “Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing,” Request for Comments: 3561, July 2003.
[9] T. Winter, P. Thubert, A. Brandt, T. Clausen, J. Hui, R. Kelsey, P. Levis, K. Pister, R. Struik and J. P. Vasseur, “RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks,” Draft-Ietf-Roll-Rpl-19, March 2011.
[10] J. Case, M. Fedor, M. Schoffstall and J. Davin, “A Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” May 1990.
[11] K. McCloghrie and M. Rose, “Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets,” Request for Comments: 1156, May 1990.
[12] K. Korte and A. Sehgal, “Definition of Managed Objects for the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks (RPL),” Draft-Sehgal-Roll-Rpl-Mib-00, October 2010.
[13] L. Lhotka, “A YANG Data Model for Routing Configuration,” Draft-Lhotka-Netmod-Routing-Cfg-00, March 2011.
[14] M. Bjorklund, “A YANG Data Model for Interface Configuration,” Draft-Ietf-Netmod-Interfaces-Cfg-01, May 2011.
[15] A. Bierman and M. Bjorklund, “YANG Data Model for System Management,” Draft-Bierman-Netmod-System-Mgmt-00, June 2011.
[16] J. N. Al-Karaki and A. E. Kamal, “Routing Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey,” Wireless Communications, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2004, pp. 6-28.
[17] D. Benchaira and A. Bencheikh, “Security of the Data Dissemination in a Wireless Sensor Network: Case of Tiny Diffusion Protocol,” Master in Computer Science, Alger, 2009.
[18] S. K. Singh, M. P. Singh and D. K. Singh, “Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks—A Survey,” International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Survey, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2010, pp. 63-83.
[19] S. Pal, D. Bhattacharyya, G. S. Tomar and T.-H. Kim, “Wireless Sensor Networks and Its Routing Protocols: A Comparative Study,” 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, Bhopal, 26-28 November 2010, pp. 314-319. doi:10.1109/CICN.2010.71
[20] A. Kemal and Y. Mohamed, “A Survey on Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2005, pp. 325-349. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2003.09.010
[21] R. V. Biradar, V. C. Patil, S. R. Sawant and R. R. Mudholkar, “Classification and Comparison of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks,” Ubiquitous Computing Security Systems, Vol. 4, Special Issue, 2009, pp. 704-711.
[22] N. Kushalnagar, G. Montenegro and C. Schumacher, “IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6Low-pans): Overview, Assumptions, Problem Statement, and Goals,” RFC 4919, August 2007.
[23] http://code.google.com/p/pyang/
[24] J. Schoenwaelder, “Common YANG Data Types,” Request for Comments: 6021, October 2010.
[25] J. P. Vasseur, M. Kim, K. Pister, N. Dejean and D. Barthel, “Routing Metrics Used for Path Calculation in Low Power and Lossy Networks,” Draft-Ietf-Roll-Routing-Metrics-19, March 2011.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.