Share This Article:

Photoperiod Affects in Vitro Flowering in Wild Peanut Arachis paraguariensis

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:295KB) PP. 567-571
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2012.35068    17,169 Downloads   52,376 Views   Citations


Arachis paraguariensis, a wild peanut species, is a potential experimental system for studying the molecular mechanisms of flowering in the genus Arachis. The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of photoperiod on in vitro reproductive behavior of five genotypes of A. paraguariensis. Day-lengths of 12, 16 and 24 h were tested to monitor in vitro flowering using growth chambers kept at 26?C ± 1?C and 60% ± 5% relative humidity under an illumination of 40 μmol?m–2?s–1. Flowering percentage of plantlets ranged from 35% to 93%, 20% to 75%, and 5% to 53% for 12, 16 and 24 h day-lengths, respectively. Genotype PI 262842 displayed the highest frequency of flowering under all the day-length treatments but in vitro flower bud initiation was delayed. The highest mean flowering percentage of 65% across all the genotypes for plantlets exposed to 12 h photoperiod is indicative that flowering induction actually occurred. The results presented in this paper provide evidence for photoperiodic flowering response as well as the occurrence of short day-length-enhanced flowering in A. paraguariensis.

Cite this paper

O. Aina, K. Quesenberry and M. Gallo, "Photoperiod Affects in Vitro Flowering in Wild Peanut Arachis paraguariensis," American Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 3 No. 5, 2012, pp. 567-571. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2012.35068.


[1] P. Subrahmanyam, J. P. Moss, D. McDonald, P. V. Rao and V. R. Rao, “Resistance to Cercosporidium personatum Leafspot in Wild Arachis Species,” Plant Disease, Vol. 69, 1985, pp. 951-954. doi:10.1094/pd-69-948
[2] P. Subrahmanyam, R. A. Naidu, L. J. Reddy, P. L. Kumar and M. Ferguson, “Resistance to Groundnut Rosette Disease in Wild Arachis Species,” Annuals of Applied Biology, Vol. 139, No. 1, 2001, pp. 45-50. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00129.x
[3] P. C. Stevenson, J. C. Anderson, W. M. Blaney and M. S. J. Simmonds, “Developmental Inhibition of Spodoptera litura (Fab.) Larvae by a Novel Caffeoylquinic Acid from the Wild Groundnut, Arachis paraguariensis (Chodat & Hassl.,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, Vol. 19, No. 12, 1993, pp. 2917-2933. doi:10.1007/BF00980592
[4] S. B. Sharma, L. J. Reddy, P. J. Bramel and M. A. Ansari, “Resistance to Meloidogyne javanica race 3 in the Arachis Gene Pool,” Nematol Mediate, Vol. 30, 2002, pp. 221-225.
[5] S. B. Narasimhulu and G. M. Reddy, “In Vitro Flowering and Pod Formation from Cotyledons of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.),” Theoretical and Applied Genetic, Vol. 69, No. 1, 1984, pp. 87-91. doi:10.1007/BF00262546
[6] P. C. Nautiyal, J. B. Misra and P. V. Zala, “Influence of Seed Maturity Stages on Germinability and Seedling Vigor in Groundnut,” Journal of SAT Agricultural Research, Vol. 8, 2010, pp. 1-10.
[7] P. A. Wigge, “FT, A Mobile Developmental Signal in Plants,” Current Biology, Vol. 21, 2011, pp. R374-R378. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.038
[8] M. J. Williams, T. R. Sinclair, P. Mislevy, K. H. Quesenberry and A. S. Blount, “Photoperiod Sensitivity of Rhizoma Peanut Germplasm,” Agronomy Journal, Vol. 100, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1366-1370. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0113
[9] H. T. Stalker and J. C. Wynne, “Photoperiodic Response of Peanut Species,” Peanut Science, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1983, pp. 59-62. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-10-2-4
[10] J. C. Wynne and D. A. Emery, “Response of Intersubspecific Peanut Hybrids to Photoperiod,” Crop Science, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1974, pp. 878-880. doi:10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400060031x
[11] H. N. Vu, P. H. Anh and D. T. Nhut, “The Role of Sucrose and Different Cytokinins in the In vitro Floral Morphogenesis of Rose (Hybrid Tea) cv. ‘First Prize’,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, Vol. 87 No. 3, 2006, pp. 315-320. doi:10.1007/s11240-006-9089-z
[12] V. K. Sharma, R. H?nsch, R. R. Mendel and J. Schulze, “Seasonal Effect on Tissue Culture Response and Plant Regeneration Frequency from Non-bombarded and Bombarded Immature Scutella of Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.) Harvested from Controlled Environment,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, Vol. 81, No. 1, 2005, pp. 19-26. doi:10.1007/s11240-004-2617-9
[13] A. Hohtola, “Seasonal Changes in Explant Viability and Contamination of Tissue Cultures from Mature Scots Pine,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1988, pp. 211-222. doi:10.1007/BF00033645
[14] R. Angrish and K. K. Nanda, “Seasonal Culture of Dormant Reproductive Buds of Salix Tetrasperma: Analysis of the Flowering Process,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1982, pp. 181-193. doi:10.1007/BF02318915:10.1007/s11240-004-2617-9
[15] P. K. Roy, A. N. K. Mamun and G. Ahmed, “In Vitro Plantlet Regeneration of Rose,” Plant Tissue Culture, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2004, pp. 149-154
[16] P. E. Still, M. I. Plata, R. J. Campbell, L. C. Bueno, E. A. Chichester and C.L. Niblett, “Regeneration of Fertile Arachis paraguariensis Plants From Callus and Suspension Cultures,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1987, pp. 37-43. doi:10.1007/BF00046077
[17] Z. Li, R. L. Jarret, R. N. Pittman, K. B. Dunbar and J. W. Demski, “Efficient Plant Regeneration from Protoplasts of Arachis paraguariensis Chodat and Hassl. Using a Nurse Culture Method,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, Vol. 34, No. 1993, pp. 83-90. doi:10.1007/BF00048467
[18] T. Murashige and F. Skoog, “A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1962, pp. 473-497.
[19] O. Gamborg, R. Miller and K. Ojima, “Nutrient Requirement of Suspensions Cultures of Soybean Root Cells,” Experimental Cell Research, Vol. 50, No. 1, 1968, pp. 151-158. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5
[20] SAS Institute Inc, “Variance Estimation: SAS/STAT(R) 9.22 User’s Guide”, Cary, 2010.
[21] G. Y. Wang, M. F. Yuan and Y. Hong, “In Vitro Flower Induction in Roses,” In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology—Plant, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2002, pp. 513-518. doi:10.1079/IVP2002340
[22] E. Bünning, “Die Endogene Tagesrhythmik Als Grundlage Der Photoperiodischen Reaktion, Berichte der Deut- schen Botanischen,” Gesellschaft, Vol. 54, 1936, pp. 590-607.
[23] T. Imaizumi, “Arabidopsis Circadian Clock and Photoperiodism: Time to Think about Location,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2010, pp. 83-89. 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.09.007
[24] R. Amasino, “Seasonal and Developmental Timing of Flowering,” The Plant Journal, Vol. 61, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1001-1013. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04148.x
[25] S. N. Nigam and R. Aruna, “Improving Breeding Efficiency for Early Maturity in Peanut,” In: J. Janick, Ed., Plant Breeding Reviews, Vol. 30, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 2008, pp. 295-322. doi:10.1002/9780470380130.ch6
[26] O. O. Aina, K. H. Quesenberry and M. Gallo, “Thidiazuron Induced Tissue Culture Regeneration in Wild Peanut Arachis paraguariensis,” Crop Science, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2012, pp. 1076-1083. doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.07.0367
[27] R. Kumar, K. Sharma and V. AgrawalIn, “In Vitro Clonal Propagation of Holarrhena antidysenterica (L.) Wall. Through Nodal Explants from Mature Trees,” In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology—Plant, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2005, pp. 137-144. doi:10.1079/IVP2004624
[28] M. Doctrinal, R. S. Sangwan and B. S. Sangwan-Norreel, “In Vitro Gynogenesis in Beta Vulgaris L.: Effects of Plant Growth Regulators, Temperature, Genotypes and Season,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1989, pp. 1-12. doi: 10.1007/BF00042276
[29] A. Ritala, L. Mannonen and M. Oksman-Caldentey, “Factors Affecting the Regeneration Capacity of Isolated Barley Microspores (Hordeum vulgare L.),” Plant Cell Report, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2001, pp. 403-407. doi:10.1007/s002990100345
[30] R. J. Summerfield and E. H. Roberts, “Arachis hypogaea,” In: A. H. Halevy, Ed., CRC Handbook of Flowering, Vol. 1, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1985, pp. 74-82.
[31] D. J. Bagnall and R. W. King, “Response of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) to Temperature, Photoperiod and Irradiance 1. Effect on Flowering,” Field Crops Research, Vol. 26, No. 3-4, 1991, pp. 263-277. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(91)90004-F
[32] D. J. Bagnall and R. W. King, “Response of Peanut (Arachis Hypogea) to Temperature, Photoperiod and Irradiance 2. Effect on Peg and Pod Development,” Field Crops Research, Vol. 26, No. 3-4, 1991, pp. 279-293. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(91)90005-G
[33] M.-L. Flohr, J. H. Williams and F. Lenz, “The Effect of Photoperiod on the Reproductive Development of a Photoperiod Sensitive Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cv. NC Ac 17090,” Experimental Agriculture, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1990, pp 397-406. doi:10.1017/S0014479700001320
[34] A. H. Bunting and J. Elston, “Ecophysiology of Growth and Adaption in the Groundnut: An Essay on Structure, Partition and Adaptation,” In: R. J. Summerfield and A. H. Bunting, Eds., Advances in Legume Science, HMSO, London, 1980, pp. 495-500.
[35] S. K. Leong and C. K. Ong, “The Influence of Temperature and Soil Water Deficit on the Development and Morphology of the Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.),” Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 34, No. 11, 1983, pp. 1551-1561.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.