The Impact of Integration of Instructional Systems Technology into Research and Educational Technology

Download Download as PDF (Size:117KB)  HTML    PP. 275-280  
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2012.32043    3,110 Downloads   6,017 Views   Citations


This paper aims at presenting a review about instructional system technology integration in educational literature. Transitional periods of educational technology are discussed and principles of integration of instructional technology in educational technology are reviewed.

Cite this paper

Makki, B. & Makki, B. (2012). The Impact of Integration of Instructional Systems Technology into Research and Educational Technology. Creative Education, 3, 275-280. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.32043.


[1] Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37, 163-178.
[2] Commission on Instructional Technology (1970). To improve learning: A report to the president and congress of the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
[3] Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
[4] Petroski, H. (1992). The evolution of useful things. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
[5] Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
[6] Anglin, G. (1995). Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (2nd ed.). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
[7] Heinich, R., Michael M., James D. R., & Sharon S. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.
[8] Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 5-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[9] Slife, B. D., & Williams, R. N. (1995). What’s behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[10] Shulman, L. (1990). Reconnecting foundations to the substance of teaching, TC Record.
[11] Trotter, A. (1997). Taking technology’s measure. In Technology counts: Schools and reform in the information age. Education Week, 17, 6-11.
[12] Viadero, D. (1997). A tool for learning. In technology counts: Schools and reform in the information age. Education Week, 17, 12-18.
[13] Zehr, M. A. (1997). Teaching the teachers. In Technology Counts: Schools and reform in the information age. Education Week, 17, 24-29.
[14] Bronner, E. (10 November 1997). High-tech teaching is losing its gloss. New York Times, 4.
[15] Pool, C. R. (1997). A new digital literacy: A conversation with Paul Gilster. Educational Leadership, 55, 6-11.
[16] Valdez, G., McNabb, M., Foertsch, M., Anderson, M., Hawkes, M., & Raack, L. (2000). Computer-based technology and learning: Evolving uses and expectations. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Laboratory.
[17] Tiene, D., & Luft, P. (2001). Teaching in a technology-rich classroom. Educational Technology, 41, 23-31.
[18] Becker, H. J. (2000). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 291-321.
[19] Albion, P. R. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers’ preparedness for teaching with technology. In J. Price et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 1999 (pp. 1602-1608). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
[20] Willis, A. (Eds.) (1994). Technology and teacher education annual 1994. Charlottesville, VA: Association for Advancement of Computing in Education. 742-744.
[21] Cassidy, M. F (1982). Toward integration: Education, instructional technology, and semiotics. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 20, 75-89.
[22] Halpin, R. (1999). A model of constructivist learning in practice: Computer literacy integrated into elementary mathematics and science teacher education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 128-138.
[23] Olivier, T. A., & Shapiro, F. (1993). Self-efficacy and computers. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20, 81-85.
[24] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[25] Kellenberger, D. W. (1996). Preservice teachers’ perceived computer self-efficacy based on achievement and value beliefs within a motivational framework. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29, 124-140.
[26] Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructionaldesign theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[27] Swain, C. (2006). Preservice teachers’ self-assessment using technology: Determining what is worthwhile and looking for changes in daily teaching and learning practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 29-59.
[28] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded Ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[29] Balasubramanian, N., Wilson, B. G., & Cios, K. J. (2005). Innovative methods of teaching and learning science and engineering in middle schools. In F. Malpica, F. Welsch, A. Tremante, & J. Lawler (Eds.), The 3rd International Conference on Education and Information Systems: Technologies and Applications: Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 174-178), Orlando, 14-17 July 2005.
[30] Bellamy, R. K. E. (1996). Designing educational technology: Computer-mediated change. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[31] Meisalo, V., Lavonen, J., Lattu, M., Juuti, K., & Lampiselk?, J. (2006). Implementation of ICT strategies in teacher education and the skills of mathematics and science student teachers. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (pp. 4026-4033). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
[32] Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[33] Williams, D., Coles, L., Richardson, A., Wilson, K., & Tuson, J. (2000). Integrating information and communications technology in professional practice: An analysis of teachers’ needs based on a survey of primary and secondary teacher in Scottish schools. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education. 9, 167-182.
[34] Fatemi, E. (1999). Building the digital curriculum: Summary. Education Week, 19, 5-11.
[35] Collier, S., Weinburgh, M., & Rivera, M. (2004). Infusing technology skills into a teacher education program: Changes in students’ knowledge about and use of technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12, 447-468.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.