Animal Handling during Supply for Marketing and Operations at an Abattoir in Developing Country: The Case of Gudar Market and Ambo Abattoir, Ethiopia

Fufa S. Bulitta, Girma Gebresenbet, Techane Bosona

Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Swede.
Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2012.51008                

Abstract

In the agricultural sector, it is important to appropriately develop livestock resources in of developing countries in order to reduce poverty. The aim of this study was to investigate the animal handling and welfare issues during transport for marketing with special focus on cattle flow to and from Gudar livestock market and activity chain of Ambo abattoir in Ethiopia. Information and data on main feeder markets to Gudar regional market; the main stakeholders in this animal supply chain; number of animals flow to and from Gudar market; the distance and time duration the animals transported; animal handling and welfare concerns during transport and at market site; and activities in Ambo abattoir chain were gathered, interpreted and discussed. The study indicated that the flow of cattle to and from Gudar market was by walk- ing which took up to 4 days or by vehicles which took up to 3 h. There were no appropriate vehicle and loading facili- ties and animal handling conditions were poor. From total number of animals supplied to Gudar market about 7.6% died, 6.9% injured and 2.8% was stolen during transport. During transport from Gudar to final destination by walking, about 16% died and 10.7% was injured. The effect of animal number (p = 0.0498) was slightly significant than the effect of travel distance (p = 0.3487) on the occurrence of incidences such as animal death and injuries, at significance level of 0.05. Lameness and injury to bone, muscle, swelling of leg and sickness were widely observed during transportation by walking. Poor market infrastructures; lack of regional abattoir facilities; difficulties in getting timely market information; and lack of well-organized networks between stakeholders were also identified as existing problems compromising the animal welfare and economic benefits. Therefore, further research works concerning animal welfare during animal flow in the supply chain; and impact of abattoir activities on environment and human and animal health should be conducted. Such studies important to improve the economic benefits gained from livestock resources with positive contribution towards efforts of insuring food security and sustainable development.

Keywords

Ethiopia; Animal Handling; Supply Chain; Animal Welfare; Livestock Market

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	B. Gebremadihin, D. Hoekstra and S. Jemaneh, “Heading toward Commercialization? The Case of Live Animal Marketing in Ethiopia,” International Livestock Research Institute, Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 5. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya, 2007.
[2]	A. Solomon, A. Workalemahu, M. A. Jabbar, M. M. Ah- med and B. Hurissa, “Livestock Marketing in Ethiopia: A Review of Structure, Performance and Development Ini- tiatives,” Socio-Economics and Policy Research Working Paper 52, 2003. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/images/iclsd/documents/ wk2c5gerard.pdf
[3]	G. Legese, H. Teklewold, D. Alemu and A. Negassa, “Live Animal and Meat Export Value Chains for Selected Area in Ethiopia, Constraints and Opportunities for Enhancing Meat Exports IRL Improving Market Opportunities,” International Livestock Research Institute, Discussion Paper 56, Nairobi, 2008.
[4]	Y. Aklilu, “An Audit of the Livestock Marketing Status in Kenya, Ethiopia and Sudan,” Vol. 1, 2002. http://www.eldis.org/fulltext/cape_new/Akliliu_Marketing_vol_1.pdf
[5]	G. Gebresenbet, T. G. Bosona, D. Ljungberg and S. Ara- dom, “Optimisation Analysis of Large and Small-Scale Abattoirs in Relation to Animal Transport and Meat Dis- tribution,” Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineer- ing, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2011, pp. 31-39.
[6]	F. J. Kenny and P. V. Tarrant, “The Reaction of Young Bulls to Short-Haul Road Transport,” Applied Animal Be- haviour Science, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1987, pp. 209-227. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(87)90147-X
[7]	G. A. Maria, M. Villarroel, G. Chacon and G. Gebresen- bet, “Scoring System for Evaluating the Stress to Cattle of Commercial Loading and Unloading,” Veterinary Re- cord, Vol. 154, 2004, pp. 818-821. doi:10.1136/vr.154.26.818
[8]	D. M. Broom, “Welfare Assessment and Welfare Problem Areas during Handling and Transport,” CAB Interna- tional, Wallingford, 1993.
[9]	G. Gebresenbet, W. Baltussen, K. Roest, K. Neilson and P. Sterrenburg, “Evaluation of the Feasibility of a Certi- fication Scheme for High Quality Control Posts,” 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/financing/docs/call_10753-2010__ feasability_report_cepost_en.pdf
[10]	D. Ljungberg, G. Gebresenbet and S. Aradom, “Logistics Chain of Animal Transport and Abattoir Operations,” Biosystems Engineering, Vol. 96, No. 2, 2007, pp. 267- 277. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.11.003
[11]	S. Frimpong, “Effect of Pre-Slaughter Handling and Transport on Welfare and Meat Quality of Cattle: A Case Study of Kumasi Abattoir,” Master’s Thesis, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, 2009.
[12]	A. Tegegne, B. G. Berhanu and D. Hoekstra, “Input Sup- ply System and Services for Market-oriented Livestock Production in Ethiopia,” Improving Productivity and Marketing Success (IPMS) Project, ILRI, Addis Ababa, 1997.
[13]	T. Grandin, “Design of Loading and Holding Pens,” Ap- plied Animal Behavior Science, Vol. 28, No. 1-2, 1990, pp. 187-201.
[14]	N. G. Gregory, “Animal Welfare at Markets and during Transport and Slaughter,” Meat Science, Vol. 80, No. 1, 2008, pp. 2-11. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.019
[15]	A. Tegegne, B. Gebremedhin and D. Hoekstra, “Input Supply System and Services for Market-oriented Live- stock Production in Ethiopia,” Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP), Addis Ababa, September 5-7 2006.
[16]	S. Atkinson, “The Importance of Animal Handling Tech- nique and Animal Handling Facility Design for the Wel- fare of Slaughter Animals,” NJF Report, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2005.
[17]	M. S. Cockram, “Criteria and Potential Reasons for Maxi- mum Journey Times for Farm Animals Destined for Slaughter,” Applied Animal Behavior Science, Vol. 106, No. 4, 2007, pp. 234-243. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.006
[18]	J. N. Sofos, “Challenges to Meat Safety in 21st Century,” Meat Science, Vol. 78, No. 1-2, 2008, pp. 3-13. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.027