LA-ICP-MS Calibrations for Intact Rock Samples with Internal Standard and Modified Constant-Sum Methods

Sheng Peng, Qinhong Hu

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ajac.2012.32024                

Abstract

Laser ablation coupled with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) calibration was conducted with multiple spot analyses on eleven intact rock samples using both an internal standard (IS) method and a modified constant-sum (MCS) method. Methods were then compared for reported bulk elemental composition of the rocks. The MCS method was based on the sum of eight major elements, which is spatially more stable than one single major ele-ment as used in the IS method, and is quite constant among different rock samples. Calibrations were performed with standard reference materials NIST SRM 610, 612, 614, and 616. Little difference was found between using a single standard and a set of standards, because of the good linearity shown by the reference materials. Comparison of the two calibration methods shows that the MCS method produced better and more stable results than the IS method for heterogeneous samples. With the MCS method, approximately 94% to 95% of the total measurements are within the range of ±100% relative deviation, compared with 82% to 86% with the IS method. The IS method resulted insubstantial overestimations for some rock samples (e.g., 648% for Basalt BCR-2 using NIST SRM 610 as the calibration standard), while the largest deviation with the MCS method was 216% for U in Eagle Ford shale #80 sample. For Quartz latite QLO-1, a relative homogeneous sample, the IS method generated slightly better results than the MCS method. Regardless of method, spatially heterogeneous distribution of elements in the intact rock at the scale of the laser spot is considered to be the main reason for the large relative deviations seen in our work compared to published results.

Keywords

LA-ICP-MS; Quantitative Calibration; Internal Standard Method; Modified Constant-Sum Method

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Q. Hu and A. M?ri, “Radionuclide Transport in Fractured Gra-nite Interface Zones,” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Vol. 33, No. 14-16, 2008, pp. 1042-1049. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2008.05.015
[2]	R. E. Russo, X. L. Mao, H. C. Liu, J. Gonzalez and S. S. Mao, “Laser Ablation in Analytical Chemistry—A Review,” Talanta, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2002, pp. 425-451. doi:10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00053-X
[3]	H. P. Longerich, “Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry: An Introduction,” In: P. Sylvester, Ed., Laser-Ablation-ICP-MS in the Earth Sciences: Current Practices and Outstanding Issues, Mineralogical Association of Canada, Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 1-18.
[4]	P. J. Sylvester, “LA-(MC)-ICP-MS Trends in 2006 and 2007 with Particular Emphasis on Measurement Uncertainties,” Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2008, pp. 469-488. doi:10.1111/j.1751-908X.2008.00924.x
[5]	S. E. Jackson, “Calibration Strategies for Elemental Analysis by LA-ICP-MS,” In: P. Sylvester, Ed., Laser- Ablation-ICP-MS in the Earth Sciences: Current Practices and Outstanding Issues, Mineralogical Association of Canada, Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 169-188.
[6]	H. P. Longerich, S. E. Jackson and D. Günther, “Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometric Transient Signal Data Acqusition and Analyte Concentration Calculation,” Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Vol. 11, No. 9, 1996, pp. 899-904. doi:10.1039/ja9961100899
[7]	B. Gratuze, “Obsidian Cha-racterization by LA-ICP-MS and Its Application to Prehistoric Trade in the Mediterranean and the Near East: Sources and Distribution of Obsidian within the Aegean and Anatolia,” Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 26, No. 8, 1999, pp. 869-881. doi:10.1006/jasc.1999.0459
[8]	M. Guillong, K. Hametner, E. Reusser, S. A. Wilson and D. Günther, “Preliminary Characte-rization of New Glass Reference Materials (GSA-1G, GSC-1G, GSD-1G and GSE-1G) by Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma- Mass Spectrometry Using 193 nm, 213 nm and 266 nm Wavelengths,” Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2005, pp. 315-331. doi:10.1111/j.1751-908X.2005.tb00903.x
[9]	L. Halicz and D. Günther, “Quantitative Analysis of Silicates Using LA-ICP-MS with Liquid Calibration,” Journal of Analytical Atomic Spec-trometry, Vol. 19, No. 12, 2004, pp. 1539-1545. doi:10.1039/b410132d
[10]	J. E. Gagnon, B. J. Fryer, I. M. Samson and A. E. Williams-Jones, “Quantitative Analysis of Silicate Certified Reference Materials by LA-ICP-MS with and without an Internal Standard,” Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Vol. 23, No. 11, 2008, pp. 1529-1537. doi:10.1039/b801807n
[11]	Y. Liu, Z. Hu, S. Gao, D. Günther, J. Xu, C. Gao and H. Chen, “In Situ Analysis of Major and Trace Elements of Anhydrous Minerals by LA-ICP-MS without Applying an Internal Standard,” Chemical Geology, Vol. 257, No. 1-2, 2008, pp. 34-43. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.004
[12]	R. L. Rudnick and S. Gao, “Composition of the Continental Crust,” In: R. L. Rudnick, Ed., The Crust, Vol. 3, Treatise on Geochemistry, Elsevi-er-Pergamon, Oxford, 2003, pp. 1-64.
[13]	M. Kurosawa, S. E. Jackson and S. Sueno, “Trace Element Analysis of NIST SRM 614 and 616 Glass Reference Materials by Laser Ablation Mi-croprobe-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry,” Geostandards Newsletter, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2002, pp. 75-84. doi:10.1111/j.1751-908X.2002.tb00625.x
[14]	M. Humayun, F.A. Davis and M. M. Hirschmann, “Major Element Analysis of Natural Silicates by Laser Ablation ICP-MS,” Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Vol. 25, No. 7, 2010, pp. 998-1025. doi:10.1039/c001391a
[15]	K. Jochum, U. Weis, B.Stoll, D. Kuzmin, Q. Yang, I. Raczek, D. Jacob, A. Stracke, K. Birbaum, D. Frick, D. Günther and J. Enzweiler, “Determination of Ref-erence Values for NIST SRM 610-617 Glasses Following ISO Guidelines,” Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2011, pp. 397-429.