Determination of a Gravimetric Geoid Solution for Andalusia (South Spain)

Francisco Manzano, Victor Corchete, Mimoun Chourak, Gil Manzano

.

DOI: 10.4236/eng.2010.23022                

Abstract

The orthometric heights can be obtained without levelling by means of the ellipsoidal and geoidal heights. For engineering purposes, these orthometric heights must be determined with high accuracy. For this reason, the determination of a high-resolution geoid is necessary. In Andalusia (South Spain) a new geopotential model (EIGEN-GL04C) has been available since the publication of a more recent regional geoid. As a consequence, these new data bring about improvements that ought to be included in a new regional geoid of Andalusia. With this aim in mind, a new gravimetric geoid determination has been carried out, in which these new data have been included. Thus, a new geoid is provided as a data grid distributed for the South Spain area from 36 to 39 degrees of latitude and –7 to –1 degrees of longitude (extending to 3 × 6 degrees), in a 120 × 240 regular grid with a mesh size of 1.5’ × 1.5’ and 28800 points in the GRS80 reference system. This calculated geoid and previous geoids are compared to the geoid undulations obtained for 262 GPS/levelling points, distributed within the study area. The new geoid shows an improvement in accuracy and reliability, fitting the geoidal heights determined for these GPS-levelling points better than any previous geoid.

Keywords

Gravity, Geoid, FFT, GPS/Levelling, Andalusia, South Spain

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	V. Corchete, M. Chourak and D. Khattach, “The high-resolution gravimetric geoid of Iberia: IGG2005,” Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 162, pp. 676-684, 2005.
[2]	C. Wichiencharoen, “FORTRAN programs for computing geoid undulations from potential coefficients and gravity anomalies,” Internal Report, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying Report, Ohio State University, Columbus, 1982.
[3]	I. Kuroishi, “Precise gravimetric determination of geoid in the vicinity of Japan,” Bulletin of Geographical Survey Institute, Vol. 41, pp. 1-94, 1995.
[4]	C. F?rste, F. Flechtner, R. Schmidt, R. K?nig, U. Meyer, R. Stubenvoll, M. Rothacher, F. Barthelmes, H. Neumayer, R. Biancale, S. Bruinsma, J.-M. Lemoine and S. Loyer, “A mean global gravity field model from the combination of satellite mission and altimetry/gravimetry surface data: EIGEN-GL04C,” Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 8, 03462, 2006.
[5]	C. F?rste, F. Flechtner, R. Schmidt, U. Meyer, R. Stubenvoll, F. Barthelmes, R. K?nig, K. H. Neumayer, M. Rothacher, Ch. Reigber, R. Biancale, S. Bruinsma, J.-M. Lemoine and J. C. Raimondo, “A new high-resolution global gravity field model derived from combination of GRACE and CHAMP mission and altimetry/gravimetry surface gravity data,” Poster presented at EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, pp. 24-29, April 2005.
[6]	W. A. Heiskanen and H. Moritz, “Physical geodesy,” W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1967.