Beware of the Dog: Traumatic Extrusion of an Artificial Urinary Sphincter Following Blunt Trauma to the Scrotum by a Domestic Animal

Michael S. Floyd Jr., Karen Chan, Andrew D. Baird
DOI: 10.4236/oju.2011.14020                

Abstract

Artificial urinary sphincters are commonly used in males with intrinsic sphincter deficiency to improve continence and quality of life. Complications include erosion, mechanical failure and infection. Frequently, a staged approach involving removal of the device, followed by a period of healing and subsequent reinsertion of a new sphincter is required to restore continence. We describe the first case ever reported of traumatic sphincter extrusion following blunt scrotal trauma by a dog and review its clinical features and management.

Keywords

Sphincter, Erosion, Trauma, Artificial, Urinary

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	F. E. Foley, “An Artificial Sphincter; A New Device and Operation for Control of Enuresis and Urinary Continence,” The Journal of Urology, Vol. 58, No. 4, 1947, pp. 250-259.
[2]	F. B. Scott, W. E. Bradley and G. W. Timm, “Treatment of Urinary Incontinence by Implantable Prosthetic Sphincter,” Urology, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1973, p. 252. doi:10.1016/0090-4295(73)90749-8
[3]	H. H. Lai, H. I. Elias, B. S. Teh, B. Butler and T. B. Boone, “13 Years of Experience with Artificial Sphincter Implantation at Baylor College of Medicine,” The Journal of Urology, Vol. 177, No. 3, 2007, pp. 1021-1025.
[4]	M. Hussian, T. J. Greenwell, S. N. Venn and A. R. Mundy, “The Current Role of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence,” The Journal of Urology, Vol. 174, No. 2, 2005, pp. 418-424. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000165345.11199.98
[5]	F. K. Lim, K. Razvi, K. F. Tham and S. S. Ratham, “Current Approach to the Management of Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Singapore Medical Journal, Vol. 36, No. 5, 1995, pp. 532-537.
[6]	S. P. Kim, Z. Sarmast, S. Daignault, G. J. Faeber, E. J. McGuire and J. M. Latine, “Long-Term Durability and Functional Outcomes among Patients with Artificial Urinary Sphincters: A 10-Tear Retrospective Review from the University of Michigan,” The Journal of Urology, Vol. 179, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1912-1916.
[7]	S. C. Fulford, C. Sutton, G. Bales, M. Hickling and T. P. Stephenson, “The Fate of the ‘Modern’ Artificial Urinary Sphincter with a Follow-Up of More than 10 Years,” British Journal of Urology, Vol. 79, No. 5, 1997, pp. 713-716. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00151.x
[8]	H. J. Duncan, P. D. McInerney and A. R. Mundy, “Late Erosion. A New Complication of Artificial Urinary Sphincters,” British Journal of Urology, Vol. 72, No. 5 Pt 1, 1993, pp. 597-598. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1993.tb16216.x
[9]	S. N. Venn, T. J. Greenwell and A. R. Mundy, “The Long-Term Outcome of Artificial Urinary Sphincters,” The Journal of Urology, Vol. 163, No. 4, 2000, pp. 702-706.
[10]	A. C. Diokno, “Erosions of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Risk Factors, Outcomes and Management,” Nature Riviews Urology, Vol. 3, No. 11, 2006, pp. 580-581. doi:10.1038/ncpuro0610
[11]	F. Maillet, J. M. Buzelin, O. Bouchot and G. Karam, “Management of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Dysfunction,” European Urology, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2004, pp. 241-245. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2004.01.017
[12]	S. A. Yap and A. R. Stone, “Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion: The Role of Corticosteroids in an Unusual Presentation,” Canadian Urological Association Journal, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2010, pp. e144-e145.