Share This Article:

Erratum to “Evaluation of a Suspended Personal Radiation Protection System vs. Conventional Apron and Shields in Clinical Interventional Procedures” [Open Journal of Radiology 3 (2013) 143-151]

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:182KB) PP. 249-249
DOI: 10.4236/ojrad.2017.74027    292 Downloads   431 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

The original online version of this article (C. Savage, T. Seale IV, C. Shaw, B. Angela, D. Marichal and C. Rees, “Evaluation of a Suspended Personal Radiation Protection System vs. Conventional Apron and Shields in Clinical Interventional Procedures,” Open Journal of Radilogy, 3, 143-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2013.33024) was mistaken of the total isolates number in Table 2. The authors wish to correct the errors to: Table 2. Other study parameters “Gycm2” should be changed to “cGycm2” All of the decimal points (“.”) should be changed to commas (“,”). For example, “47.486” should be “47,486”.

KEYWORDS

Table 2. Other study parameters.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Rees, C. (2017) Erratum to “Evaluation of a Suspended Personal Radiation Protection System vs. Conventional Apron and Shields in Clinical Interventional Procedures” [Open Journal of Radiology 3 (2013) 143-151]. Open Journal of Radiology, 7, 249-249. doi: 10.4236/ojrad.2017.74027.
  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.