Physics on the Adiabatically Changed Finslerian Manifold and Cosmology

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:344KB) PP. 582-595
DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2017.53050    393 Downloads   518 Views  

ABSTRACT

In present paper, we confirm our previous result [4] that the Planck constant is adiabatic invariant of the electromagnetic field propagating on the adiabatically changed Finslerian manifold. Direct calculation of the Planck constant from the first principles with using of the actually measured cosmological parameters, gives value h = 6×10-27 (erg · s). We also confirm that Planck constant (and hence other fundamental constants which depend on h) is varied on time due to changing of geometry. As an example the variation of the fine structure constant is calculated. Its relative variation ((d/a/dt)/a) consist 1.0×10-18(1/s). We show that on the Finsler manifold characterized by adiabatically changed geometry, the classical free electromagnetic field is quantized geometrically, from the properties of the manifold in such manner that the adiabatic invariant of field is ET = 6×10-27 = h. Equations of electrodynamics on the Finslerian manifold are obtained. It is stressed that quantization naturally appears from these equations and is provoked by adiabatically changed geometry of the manifold. We consider in details two direct consequences of the equations: i) cosmological redshift of photons and ii) effects of Aharonov-Bohm, that immediately follow from obtained equations. It is shown that quantization of systems consists of electromagnetic field and baryonic component (like atoms) is obvious and has clear explanation.

Cite this paper

Lipovka, A. (2017) Physics on the Adiabatically Changed Finslerian Manifold and Cosmology. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 5, 582-595. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2017.53050.

References

[1] Einstein, A. (1905) Uber einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt. Annalen der Physik, 17, 132-148.
https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053220607
[2] Debye, P. (1910) Der Wahrscheinfichkeitsbegriff in der Theorie der Strahlung. Annalen der Physik, 33, 1427-1434.
https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19103381617
[3] De Gosson, M. and Hiley, B. (2013) Short-Time Quantum Propagator and Bohmian Trajectories. Physics Letters A, 377, 3005-3008.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.08.031
[4] Zhotikov, V.G. (2011) N. Bohr’s Postulates and Bohr-Sommerfeld’s Quantization Rules as Consequences from Finsler Geometry. Proceedings of International Meeting “Physical Interpretation of Relativity Theory”, Moscow, 4-7 July 2011.
[5] Lipovka, A.A. (2014) Planck’s Constant as Adiabatic Invariant Characterized by Hubble’s and Cosmological Constants. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2, 61-71.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2014.25009
[6] Lipovka, A.A. and Cardenas, I.A. (2016) Variation of the Fine Structure Constant. arXiv: 1608.04593.
[7] Rund, H. (1966) The Hamilton-Jacobi Theory in the Calculus of Variations: Its Role in Mathematics and Physics. D. Van Nostrand Co., New York.
[8] Rund, H. (1959) The Differential Geometry of Finsler Spaces. (Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften (Book 101)). Springer, Berlin.
[9] Zhotikov, V.G. (2014) Introduction to the Finsler Geometry and Its Generalizations (for Physicists). MPTI, Moscow.
[10] Zhotikov, V.G. (2014) About the Modern Point of View on the A. Einstein’s Principle of General Relativity. Hypercomplex Numbers in Geometry and Physics, 1, 21-36.
[11] Zhotikov, V.G. (2009) Finsler Geometry (According to Wagner) and the Equations of the Movement in the Relativistic Dynamics. Proceedings of 15th International Meeting: Physical Interpretation of Relativity Theory, Moscow, 6-9 July 2009, 133-144.
[12] Zhotikov, V.G. (2016) On Influence of Derivatives Higher Order of Lagrange Function Dynamical System on Its Center Mass Movement. Inzhenernaya Fisica, 12, 11-14.
[13] Marchc, M.C., Trotta, R., Berkes, P., Starkman, G.D. and Vaudrevange, P.M. (2011) Improved Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from Type Ia Supernova Data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 418, 2308-2329.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19584.x
[14] Lipovka, A.A. (2016) Nature of the Quantum Potential. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 4, 897-902.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2016.45098
[15] Philippidis, C., Bohm, D. and Kaye, R.D. (1982) The Aharonov-Bohm Effect and the Quantum Potential. Il Nuovo Cimento B, 71, 75-88.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721695
[16] Chirkov, A.G. and Ageev, A.N. (2001) On the Nature of the Aharonov-Bohm Effect. Technical Physics, 46, 147-153.
https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1349267
[17] Kobe, D.H. (1979) Aharonov-Bohm Effect Revisited. Annals of Physics, 123, 381-410.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(79)90344-0
[18] Bagrov, V.G., Gitman, D.M. and Skarzhinsky, V.D. (1986) Aharonov-Bohm Effect for Stationary and Coherent States of an Electron in Homogeneous Magnetic Field. In: Komar, A.A., Ed., Classical and Quantum Effects in Electrodynamics, Izdatel’stvo Nauka, Moscow, 151-165.
[19] Bagrov, V.G., Gavrilov, S.P., Gitman, D.M. and Meira Filho, D.P. (2011) Coherent and Semiclassical States in a Magnetic Field in the Presence of the Aharonov-Bohm Solenoid. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44, Article ID: 055301.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/5/055301
[20] Wu, T.T. and Yang, C.N. (1975) Concept of Nonintegrable Phase Factors and Global Formulation of Gauge Fields. Physical Review D, 12, 3845-3857.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.