Smoking Cessation in the Middle East after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Results from the First Jordanian Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry (JoPCR1) ()
Received 18 April 2016; accepted 4 July 2016; published 7 July 2016
1. Introduction
Cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the Middle East [1] [2] . Among Middle Eastern patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 30% - 50% are cigarette smokers. This rate reaches up to 70% in patients younger than 55 years of age [3] [4] . Practice guidelines for the management of patients with ACS recommend counseling smokers to quit smoking before hospital discharge [5] [6] . Studies from the west, have repeatedly demonstrated that the rate of SC remains disappointing despite its proven advantages [7] - [11] . SC rate in Middle Eastern patients who sustain ACS or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and the clinical and coronary angiographic features of those who quit smoking compared with those who continue to smoke, have not been studied in this region. The two published local studies evaluated SC rates among CVD patients but did not address the incidence rates of major cardiovascular events during hospitalization or at one year of follow-up in quitters compared with persistent smokers or non-smokers [12] [13] .
We used the recently completed First Jordanian PCI Registry (JoPCR1) [14] to study the rate of SC among Middle Eastern patients who underwent PCI, and to assess the clinical profiles and coronary angiographic features on admission in those who quit smoking compared with persistent smokers and non-smokers. We also used the registry’s data to evaluate the cardiovascular outcome at one year in these three groups. The study could have a positive impact on the clinical practice among health care providers in the region by stressing the importance of quitting smoking in such a relatively young population.
2. Methods
The first Jordanian PCI Registry (JoPCR1) is a prospective, multicenter study that involved 2425 patients who underwent PCI for ACS or stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in 12 centers (January 2013 to February 2014) and were followed up for one year after the index hospitalization. Patients who were cigarette smokers at enrollment were considered current smokers. Patients who never smoked, and past smokers who quit at least one month prior to enrollment were considered non-smokers. SC was defined as abstinence from cigarette smoking from enrollment to the time of follow up. The rate of quitting smoking was assessed among smokers at 1, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge during outpatient visits or hospital readmissions, or by phone calls.
Patients were directly questioned whether they quit smoking or not, and if they did; they were asked about the timing of quitting. No laboratory test was performed to ascertain the smoking status. Non-smokers were asked if they acquired the habit of smoking cigarettes during the study period of one year.
The incidence rates of major complications (ventricular tachycardia, heart failure and emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery) were assessed during the index hospitalization, and the major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, stent thrombosis and major bleeding events) were evaluated from admission to one year of follow up. Coronary revascularization and readmission for ACS were assessed from the time of hospital discharge to one year later. Incidence rates of these events were compared in non-smokers, those who quit and persistent smokers.
ACS was classified as acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), or non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTEACS), that includes non-ST-segment MI (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA). Stable CAD was defined as chronic stable angina or silent ischemia [15] . Stent thrombosis (definite and probable) was defined according to the Academic Research Consortium definition [16] , and major bleeding events were defined according to the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress AD verse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines) study definition [17] . The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each participating center.
IBM SPSS Statistics 20 (IBM Corp., 2011) was used for data entry and analysis. Data were described using means and percentages. Independent t test was used to test differences between the mean of continuous variables between quitters and persistent smokers. Chi-square test was used to test the differences between proportions and test the differences in the rates of in-hospital and one year cardiovascular events between non-smokers, quitters and persistent smokers. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
Of the 2425 patients enrolled, 1055 (43.5%) were current smokers. Baseline clinical features of these patients are shown in Table 1. Smokers who underwent PCI in this study were predominantly men and a decade younger than their counterparts in the west. About half of them had hypertension, and one-third had diabetes mellitus or past history of CAD. The majority of smokers (82%) had PCI for ACS, NSTEACS was more common than STEMI, and half of them had elevated serum levels of cardiac enzymes. One-vessel PCI was performed in the majority of these patients (75%).
![]()
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of current smokers in the JoPCR1 registry.
CAD: coronary artery disease, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, NSTEACS: non-ST- segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention, STEMI: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Quitting smoking was reported by 348 (33%) smokers at one month, 317 (30%) at 6 months, and 327 (31%) at one year. Among the non-smokers, no patient reported acquiring the habit of smoking during the study period.
The risk factors, clinical features and angiographic characteristics of 260 quitters compared with 591 persistent smokers, who had follow-up data at one year, are shown in Table 2. Compared with persistent smokers; quitters had higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, low left ventricular ejection fraction and heart failure. They also had lower prevalence of previous history of CAD or PCI. We compared these baseline risk profiles and clinical features on admission of the two groups (quitters and persistent smokers) with non-smokers (N = 1371). Non-smokers were older (mean age 62 ± 10 years), more likely to be women (32%), have higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (64%), hypertension (70%), dyslipidemia (52%), past history of CAD (39%), and previous PCI (26%), and underwent more PCI procedures for multivessel CAD during admission (31%). All p-values < 0.02.
Major complications and cardiovascular events during the index admission and at one year in non-smokers, quitters and persistent smokers are shown in Table 3. Of the studied in-hospital events, incidence rates of major bleeding events and cardiovascular deaths differed significantly among the three groups of patients (p-value = 0.017 for major bleeding, and 0.012 for cardiovascular death). The rates of these two complications were significantly higher among non-smokers compared to quitters and persistent smokers, and the rate of major bleeding was almost double in quitters compared to persistent smokers. Moreover, the three groups differed significantly in the rates of major bleeding, cardiovascular death and coronary revascularization after one year of follow up. The incidence rates of major bleeding and cardiovascular death after one year were the highest among non- smokers followed by quitters and persistent smokers. The rate of coronary revascularization was significantly higher in quitters compared to non-smokers and persistent smokers.
4. Discussion
The main findings in this study are: 1) about 30% of Middle Eastern smokers quit smoking after one year of un-
![]()
Table 2. Risk factors profiles, clinical features and angiographic characteristics in quitters compared with persistent smokers.
CAD: coronary artery disease, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, NSTEACS: non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention, STEMI: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
![]()
Table 3. In-hospital major complications and one year cardiovascular events in non-smokers, quitters and persistent smokers.
ACS: acute coronary syndrome, CABG: coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
dergoing PCI, 2) quitters were more likely to have diabetes mellitus, heart failure or low left ventricular ejection fraction compared with persistent smokers, and 3) one year of follow-up was not long enough to show significant cardiovascular benefits among quitters.
SC is ranked among the most powerful secondary prevention strategies of CVD, and is strongly advocated by practice guidelines for the treatment of patients admitted with ACS [5] [6] [18] [19] . SC in post-MI patients reduced cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, and heart failure hospitalization in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Persistent smokers remain at greater risk of death, recurrent MI, stent thrombosis and need for coronary revascularization compared with those who quit [20] - [23] .
Due to the high prevalence of smoking in our region, and the relatively younger age group of patients admitted with ACS or those who undergo PCI; SC is of significant importance in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention. Furthermore; smokers in our study have high prevalence of other concomitant cardiovascular risk factors and comorbid diseases, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia, implicating that secondary cardiovascular prevention in such a patient population is complex and multifaceted task that involves life style modification and using multiple medications.
The rate of SC in this studied PCI population was not different from that demonstrated by studies from other regions in the world and ranges between 21% and 36% after 6 to 12 months of sustaining an ACS event [7] [8] [10] [19] . Furthermore; studies that assessed the benefit of the use of pharmacotherapy for SC in a population composed entirely of patients hospitalized with acute MI; showed that the SC rates at 1 year were 37% in smokers who used bupropion and 32% in the placebo group (p = 0.33) [24] [25] .
Despite the fact that only one study demonstrated an exceptionally high rate of SC (84%) [26] , quitting rates of 30% or more are considered “fairly high” [7] [24] . These rates implicate that 70% of patients do not quit smoking and remain at high risk of future events. A minimal rate of 50% of SC is probably an acceptable goal [7] .
In concordance with other investigators [24] ; we did not observe an increase in the rate of SC at early (1 month) or late (1 year) follow up. The SC remained fairly constant at an approximate rate of 30%. Furthermore; the post-PCI SC rates in our region did not improve in the past 10 - 12 years despite treatment advances. Two local studies, published in 2002 and 2010, showed SC rates of 32.8% and 29.7%; respectively [12] [13] . These rates are not different from those that we report in this contemporary study.
Odds of SC are greater when counseling is initiated during hospitalization for MI and supplying patients with discharge recommendations for life style modification, in addition to repeated contacts, usually by telephone, for ≥3 months after discharge [7] [10] [18] [21] . Patients enrolled in our study received SC advice during admission and out-patient clinic visits. The majority of them, however, did not follow a formal in-patient or out-patient SC program.
Although SC is more likely to be successful during the initial hospitalization phase where the smokers are under significant stress related to the acute cardiac disease and potential risks of the revascularization procedure; the low rate of quitting smoking in our cohort argues against a positive impact of such stresses on the smoker’s decision to quit. We speculate that the contemporary expedited revascularization strategy of early invasive policy provided to the majority of patients admitted with ACS, that results in rapid resolution of chest pain with low incidence of life-threatening complications and a relatively short hospital stay may all negatively affect the SC decision taken by some patients. There is also shorter time of physicians’ contact with patients to adequately discuss SC when the hospital stay is on average 1 - 2 days [3] [4] [11] . Lack of a cardiac rehabilitation program can also negatively impact the SC efforts by the medical staff. In fact, a large study found that the strongest predictor of SC post-PCI was participation in such a program during the index hospitalization [27] .
Other reasons for low rates of SC after ACS and PCI are physician- and patient-related factors. Physician- related factors include low rate of referral to SC counseling, and hesitation to add a SC medication to a long list of cardiovascular medications. Patient-related factors, such as gender, lower education level, socioeconomic status, depression, lack of motivation, nicotine dependence as measured by number of cigarettes smoked per day and years of smoking, larger amount of smoking, and reluctance to take medications with potential side effects [28] [29] .
We observed that smokers who quit smoking were more likely to have diabetes, heart failure, or low left ventricular ejection fraction compared with persistent smokers, implicating that the presence of these comorbidities may have a positive impact on the patient’s decision to quit smoking. Physicians are encouraged to enquire about tobacco use at each office visit or readmission to hospital, and to extend a clear SC recommendation to patients who continue to smoke. Physicians can assist their patients to quit smoking through counseling and pharmacotherapy, which are most effective when used in combination. Providing behavior therapy, telephone support, and self-help materials can all help post ACS and PCI patients to quit smoking [24] [28] - [31] . Promoting SC as an important secondary prevention strategy is a task that is not limited to health care providers, and should involve the smokers’ families and coworkers, large-scale campaigns, and effective anti-smoking laws [32] [33] .
Several observations from the registry can explain the differences in the incidence rates of in-hospital complications and major cardiovascular events in the three groups (quitters, persistent smokers and non-smokers) from hospitalization to one year. Significant changes in the incidence of ventricular tachycardia, heart failure, referral to emergency CABG or stent thrombosis were not expected to occur at lower rates during hospitalization in quitters compared with the other two groups because the positive cardiovascular effects of SC are unlikely to be manifested during the short periprocedural admission period.
Major bleeding events and cardiovascular deaths were significantly higher among non-smokers than the other two groups from hospitalization to one year of follow up. This is most likely due to higher prevalence of independent risk factors for these two adverse events among non-smokers including the older age, higher percentage of women and diabetics, and multivessel PCI [34] - [37] . Extending registries to longer follow up duration (i.e., 5 years or so) and enrolling larger numbers of smokers might be needed to demonstrate hard evidence of cardiovascular benefits among quitters.
This study has few limitations. The findings should be interpreted with caution considering that fact that the study was conducted in tertiary care centers that might offer better care for ACS and PCI patients than other centers. Hence, the conclusions we reached might not represent smoking behavior among smokers treated at other centers in the region. The data used to assess abstinence from smoking were self-reported by smokers and was not substantiated by objective evidence. Hence; possible misreporting of the smoking status could not be ruled out. Furthermore, a minority of patients (1.5% at one year) could be reached for follow up which could result in selection bias.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, the rate of CS among Middle Eastern patients who undergo PCI is around 30%. Comprehensive secondary prevention strategy in such patients should include an effective smoking cessation program that extends beyond hospital discharge. Larger studies that extend the follow-up period for several years are needed to document a positive impact of SC on improving cardiovascular outcome.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the members of the JoPCR1 Investigators Group: Abdelbasit Khatib, MD; Abdelfattah Al-Nadi, RN; Abeer Al Bashaireh, PharmD; Ahmad Abdulsattar, MD; Ahmad Harassis, MD, FACC; Akram Saleh, MD; Aktham Hiari, MD, FACC; Ali Shakhatreh, MD; Amr Rasheed, MD; AssemNammas, MD, FACC; Ayed Al-Hindi, MD; Azzam Jamil, MD; Bashar Al A’Amar, MD; Batool Haddad, PharmD; Dalal Al Natour, PharmD; Eyas Al Mousa, MD, FACC; GhaidaMelhem, PharmD; Hadi Abu-Hantash, MD, FACC; Hanan Abunimeh, PharmD; Haneen Kharabsheh, PharmD; Hasan Tayyim, PharmD; Hatem Tarawneh, MD, FACC; Hisham Janabi, MD; Husam Khader, RN; Hussein Al-Amrat, MD; Ibrahim Abu Ata, MD, FACC; Ibrahim Jarrad, MD, FESC; Imad Alhaddad, MD, FACP, FACC; Jamal Dabbas, MD; KamelTouqan, MD; Laith Nassar, MD; Lewa Al-Hazaimeh, MD; Mahmoud Eswed, MD; Mahmoud Izraiq, MD; Mazen Sudqi, MD; Medhat Bakri, MD; Mohammad Bakri, MD; Mohamad Jarrah, MD; Mohammed Mohialdeen, MD; MohannadMomani, RN; Monther Hassan, MD; Nadeen Kufoof, PharmD; Najat Afaneh, PharmD; Nael Shobaki, MD; Nidal Hamad, MD, FACC; Nuha Abu-Diak, PharmD; Osama Okkeh, MD; Qasem Al-Shamayleh, MD, FACC; Raed Awaysheh, MD; Ramzi Tabbalat, MD, FACC; Ryad Jumaa, MD; Sahm Gharaibeh, MD; Saleh Eliamat, RN; Yousef Qussous, MD, FACC; Zakaria Qaqa, MD, FACC; and Ziad Abu Taleb, MD.
Funding
The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca.
Conflicts of Interest
Ayman J. Hammoudeh, MD, FACC, the PI of the JoPCR1, is the recipient of an unrestricted grant form AstraZeneca.
NOTES
*Corresponding author.