In Vitro Antioxidant Properties of Phloretin—An Important Phytocompound

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species [ROS] cause oxidative damage to the tissues and protection from such damages is provided by endogenous and exogenous antioxidants. Much research work has been carried out in recent years on the beneficial effect of phenolic compounds which act as natural antioxidants and help to neutralize free radicals. So, this study was aimed to evaluate the in vitro antioxidant capacity of one of the phenolic compounds phloretin. Phloretin was used at four different concentrations like 20, 40, 60 and 80 μg/ml to determine the antioxidant activity by different methods such as total antioxidant capacity, reducing power, DPPH radical scavenging, superoxide anion radical scavenging and metal chelating assays. In addition to that the ascorbic acid was used as reference compound. The results showed that the phloretin displayed potent in vitro antioxidant capacity. It was able to scavenge different in vitro free radicals in all tested concentrations. Among the different concentrations, 80 μg of phloretin has maximum activity when compared to other concentrations in all in vitro antioxidant assays. High antioxidant property and maximum protective effect of phloretin were observed in a concentration dependent manner. The results were expressed as IC50 value. The lowest IC50 value indicates the highest scavenging activity. The reducing power of the phloretin was also found in concentration dependent. According to the results of this study, we concluded that the phloretin possesses antioxidant property. Therefore, phloretin is a powerful antioxidant phytocompound which can protect biological systems against the oxidative stress. From this study, we suggest that the phloretin may be used as a dietary natural antioxidant supplement for preventing free radical related diseases.

Share and Cite:

Nithiya, T. and Udayakumar, R. (2016) In Vitro Antioxidant Properties of Phloretin—An Important Phytocompound. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 4, 85-94. doi: 10.4236/jbm.2016.41010.

Received 9 November 2015; accepted 11 January 2016; published 14 January 2016

1. Introduction

The reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide anion (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radical (∙OH) are produced within the body or from the environment have a great effect on human system. They are continuously produced during cell metabolism, or sometimes the immune cells produced them to neutralize the foreign bodies. Moreover, environmental factors such as radiation, pollution, herbicides, cigarette smoke and certain foods can also create free radicals [1] . ROS play an important role in the physiological process; however because of their toxicity, their levels must be controlled by the endogenous antioxidant system. But when the ROS production is increased, an imbalance is promoted between these and the antioxidant molecules and this phenomenon is known as oxidative stress (OS). It can adversely affect various cellular biomolecules like protein, RNA and DNA causing serious damage to tissues and organs resulting in chronic disease such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes mellitus, arthritis and neurodegenerative disease [2] .

Antioxidants are act as free radical scavengers, reducing agents and quenchers of singlet oxygen molecule, and activators for antioxidant enzymes to suppress the damage induced by free radicals in biological system [3] . Human body has several mechanisms to counteract oxidative stress by producing antioxidants, which are either naturally or externally supplied through foods and/or supplements. These antioxidants act as free radical scavengers by preventing and repairing damages caused by ROS and therefore can also enhance the immune defenses and lower the risk of cancer and degenerative diseases [4] . In recent years, there is an increasing interest in the field of determination of antioxidant phytochemicals, because they can inhibit the propagation of free radical mediated oxidative stress and protect the human body from diseases [5] . Numerous natural and synthetic ROS scavengers and antioxidants have been developed and studied to protect biomolecules against the attack of ROS and/or to suppress the resultant damage. Some proteins from jellyfish Rhopilema esculentum [6] , processed cowpea seed extracts [7] and an enzymatic hydrolysate from brown algae Ecklonia cava [8] have been reported to possess a noticeable antioxidant activity. Natural flavonoids are known for their significant scavenging properties on oxygen radicals by both in vivo and in vitro. In addition to these important effects, they have membrane stabilizing properties and also affect some processes of intermediary metabolism [9] . Flavonoids are a diverse group of compounds, which are widely distributed in the plant kingdom. These agents and related synthetic analogues mediate a broad spectrum of biological responses, such as antiallergic, antiinflammatory, antioxidant, gastro protective, antiviral, antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic activities [10] .

Among the natural products, phloretin is attracting much interest because of its beneficial effects. Phloretin, a natural active compound belongs to flavonoids, exists in sap of apple, pear and other fruits and vegetables. Phloretin has been studied as a possible penetration enhancer for skin-based drug delivery [11] , attenuates inflammation by antagonizing prostaglandins [12] and protects the skin from UV light-induced photodamage [13] . It can serve the purposes of antioxidation, antitumor, antidiabetes, antibiosis and para-hormone under physiological context [14] -[16] . There are many pharmacological studies on phloretin, but no studies on in vitro antioxidant activity of phloretin. So, the present study was aimed to examine the in vitro antioxidant activity of phloretin.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Phloretin was purchased from sigma chemicals company (St. Louis, MO, USA). Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT), Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), Trichloro acetic acid (TCA), Thiobarbituric acid (TBA), 1,1- diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and Potassium hexa cyano ferrate [K3Fe(CN)6] were used in this study are of analytical grade and were purchased from Himedia Laboratories, Bangalore, India.

2.2. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assay

The free radical scavenging activity of phloretin was measured by DPPH using the method of Shimada et al. [17] . 0.1 mM solution of DPPH in ethanol was prepared and 1ml of this solution was added to 3 ml of phloretin solution at different concentrations like 20, 40, 60 and 80 µg/ml. The mixture was shaken vigorously and allowed to stand for 30 min at room temperature and then the absorbance was measured at 517 nm using spectrophotometer. Lower absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated that the higher free radical scavenging activity. The DPPH free radical scavenging activity was calculated by the following formula.

where A control is the absorbance of control reaction (containing all reagents except the test compound), and A sample is the absorbance of test compound.

2.3. Determination of Total Antioxidant Capacity

The total antioxidant activity of the phloretin was evaluated by the phosphomolybdenum method according to the procedure of Prieto et al. [18] . The assay is based on the reduction of Mo(VI)−Mo(V) by phloretin and subsequent formation of a green phosphate/Mo(V) complex at acidic pH. 0.3 ml of phloretin solution at different concentrations like 20, 40, 60 and 80 µg/ml was mixed with 3 ml of reagent (0.6 M sulfuric acid, 28 mM sodium phosphate and 4 mM ammonium molybdate). The tubes containing the reaction mixture were incubated at 95˚C for 90 min. After cooling to room temperature, the absorbance of the solution was measured at 695 nm using spectrophotometer against blank. The antioxidant activity was expressed as the number of equivalents of ascorbic acid. The scavenging activity was calculated according to the following equation.

where A control is the absorbance of control reaction (containing all reagents except the test compound), and A sample is the absorbance of test compound

2.4. Superoxide Anion Scavenging Activity

Measurement of superoxide anion scavenging activity of phloretin was carried out based on the method described by Liu et al. [19] . Superoxide radical is generated in PMS-NADH systems by oxidation of NADH and assayed by the reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT). In this experiment, the superoxide radical was generated in 1 ml of Tris-HCl buffer (16 mM, pH 8.0), 1ml of NBT (50 µM), 1ml of NADH (78 µM) and sample solution at different concentrations like 20, 40, 60 and 80 µg/ml. The reaction was started by the addition of 1ml of phenazine methosulphate (10 µM PMS) to the mixture. The reaction mixture was incubated at 25˚C for 5 min, and the absorbance was measured against blank at 560 nm using spectrophotometer. Ascorbic acid was used as a standard. Decrease in absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated that the increased superoxide anion scavenging activity. The percentage inhibition of superoxide anion generation was calculated by the following formula.

where A control is the absorbance of control reaction (containing all reagents except the test compound) and A sample is the absorbance of test compound.

2.5. Metal Chelating Activity

The chelation of ferrous ions by phloretin and standard ascorbic acid was estimated by the method of Dinis et al. [20] . The sample solution at different concentrations like 20, 40, 60 and 80 µg/ml was added to 0.05 ml of 2 mM FeCl2. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 5mM ferrozine (0.2 ml) and the mixture was vigorously shaken and left it stands for 10 min at room temperature. The absorbance of the solution was measured at 562 nm using spectrophotometer. The percentage of inhibition of Fe2+-ferrozine complex formation was calculated by the following formula.

where A control is the absorbance of control reaction (containing all reagents except the test compound) and A sample is the absorbance of test compound.

2.6. Reducing Power Assay

The reducing power of phloretin was determined by the method of Oyaizu [21] . 1ml of phloretin at different concentrations like 20, 40, 60 and 80 µg/ml of distilled water was mixed with phosphate buffer (2.5 ml, 0.2 M, pH 6.6) and potassium ferricyanide [K3Fe(CN)6] (2.5 ml, 1%). The mixture was incubated at 50˚C for 20 min and then 2.5 ml of TCA (10%) was added to the mixture, which was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The upper layer of solution (2.5 ml) was mixed with distilled water (2.5 ml) and FeCl3 (0.5 ml, 0.1%), and then the absorbance was measured at 700 nm using spectrophotometer. Higher absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated that the greater reducing power. Ascorbic acid was used as a standard.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All the tests in this study were carried out in triplicates and the results were expressed as mean ± SD. The free radical scavenging activity of phloretin was expressed as percentage (%). Linear regression analysis was used to calculate IC50 values using Microsoft Office Excel.

3. Results and Discussion

Flavonoids are secondary metabolites with significant antioxidant and chelating activities. Biological and pharmacological properties of flavonoids depend on their antioxidant activity. Flavonoids are polyphenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of flavonoids depends on the number, structure and substitution pattern of hydroxyl groups [22] .

3.1. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

The model of scavenging the stable DPPH radical is a widely used method to evaluate antioxidant activity in a short time compared with other methods. The effect of antioxidants on DPPH radical scavenging was thought to be due to their hydrogen donating ability. DPPH is a stable free radical and accepts an electron or hydrogen radical to become a stable diamagnetic molecule [23] . Phloretin at four different concentrations like 20, 40, 60 and 80 µg/ml was used for the determination of free radical scavenging activity by DPPH method and it was compared with ascorbic acid as standard compound. The highest level of DPPH radical scavenging activity of phloretin 86.81% and ascorbic acid 99.34% was found at 80 µg/ml and the results were summarized in Table 1 and graphically represented in Figure 1. The scavenging effect was increased with the increasing concentrations

Table 1. Free radical scavenging activity of phloretin using DPPH.

Values are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates.

Figure 1. Free radical scavenging activity of phloretin using DPPH.

of test compound phloretin. The IC50 value for phloretin and ascorbic acid was 48.56 μg/ml and 34.91 μg/ml, respectively. From the results, ascorbic acid displays more scavenging activity over the phloretin. This might be due to the presence of methoxy group which increases the accessibility of radical center of DPPH to ascorbic acid [24] .

Free radical scavenging activity of the phloretin is concentration dependent, and the concentration of phloretin increases, the radical scavenging activity was also increased. The lower IC50 value reflects better protective action. From the results, it may be postulated that phlorein was able to reduce the stable free radical DPPH to yellow colored diphenyl picrylhydrazine and which exhibits the better free radical scavenging activity of phlorein. It was reported that oxidative stress, which occurs when free radical formation exceeds the body’s ability to protect itself, forms the biological basis of chronic condition [25] . Based on the data obtained from this study, phloretin is a powerful free radical inhibitor or scavenger, as well as a primary antioxidant that reacts with free radicals, which may limit free radical damage occurring in the human body.

3.2. Total Antioxidant Capacity

Total antioxidant activity of phloretin was determined by phosphomolybdenum method, which is based on the reduction of Mo(V1) to Mo(V) by the sample and the subsequent formation of green phosphate/Mo(V) compounds in acidic pH with a maximum absorption at 695 nm. Table 2 shows the total antioxidant activity of phloretin and standard compound ascorbic acid at different concentrations like 20, 40, 60 and 80 µg/ml. Phloretin exhibited effective and powerful antioxidant activity in all concentrations. The percentage of inhibition was found as 22.13%, 42.56%, 69.65% and 89.32% for 20, 40, 60 and 80 µg/ml of phloretin, respectively. Figure 2 is also revealed that the total antioxidant capacity of different concentrations like 20, 40, 60 and 80 µg/ml of phloretin. The total antioxidant activity of phloretin was increased with increasing the concentration. The IC50 value for phloretin and ascorbic acid was 44.83 µg/ml and 42.40 µg/ml, respectively. The results are in agreement with the report of Aliyu et al. [26] , and they investigated the antioxidant activity of Ethulia conyzoides, which indicates that the concentration dependent total antioxidant capacity.

Table 2. Total antioxidant activity of phloretin by phosphomolybdenum assay.

Values are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates.

Figure 2. Total antioxidant activity of phloretin by phosphomolybdenum assay.

3.3. Superoxide Anion Scavenging Activity

Superoxide is a highly reactive molecule produced through metabolic processes that reacts with various substances. Superoxide dismutase is present in aerobic and anaerobic organisms catalyses the breakdown of superoxide radicals [27] . Percentage scavenging of superoxide anion examined at different concentrations like 20, 40, 60, 80 μg/ml of phloretin was depicted in Table 3 and graphically represented in Figure 3. The percentage of scavenging superoxide radical increased with the enhanced concentration of phloretin. The maximum scavenging activity of phloretin and ascorbic acid was found at 80 μg/ml as 82.42% and 98.51%, respectively. The IC50 value of phloretin and ascorbic acid was recorded as 44.16 μg/ml and 31.62 μg/ml, respectively. In vitro superoxide radical scavenging activity is measured by riboflavin/light/NBT (Nitro blue tetrazolium) reduction. This method is based on the generation of superoxide radical by auto oxidation of riboflavin in the presence of light. Superoxide is biologically important as it can form singlet oxygen and hydroxyl radical. Overproduction of superoxide anion radical contributes to redox imbalance and associated with harmful physiological consequences [28] . From these results, it was found that the phloretin showed potent superoxide anion free radical scavenging activity.

3.4. Metal Chelating Activity

Table 4 shows the metal chelating activity of phloretin and ascorbic acid. Figure 4 represents the metal chelating activity was increased with increasing concentration of phloretin and ascorbic acid. At 80 μg/ml, phloretin had highest metal chelating activity 89.23% and the reference compound ascorbic acid was showed 98.65%. The IC50 value for phloretin and standard ascorbic acid was 44.59 µg/ml and 30.9 µg/ml, respectively. Ferrozine can quantitatively form complexes with Fe2+. The complex formation is disrupted in the presence of chelating agents with the result that the red colour of the complex is decreased. The chelating activity of coexisting chelator was

Table 3. Superoxide radical scavenging activity of phloretin.

Values are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates.

Figure 3. Superoxide radical scavenging activity of phloretin.

Table 4. Metal chelating activity of phloretin.

Values are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates.

Figure 4. Metal chelating activity of phloretin.

3.5. Reducing Power

Table 5 and Figure 5 shows that the reductive capability of phloretin and standard ascorbic acid. For the measurements of the reductive ability, we investigated that the Fe3+-Fe2+ transformation in the presence of phloretin and ascorbic acid. The reducing power increased steadily with increasing concentration of phloretin (20 - 80 μg/ml). Increased absorbance with the increased concentrations of the reaction mixture indicated that the increased reducing power. However, the highest scavenging activity was observed at 80 μg/ml of phloretin and standard ascorbic acid. Reducing power indicates that the compounds are electron donors, which can act as primary and secondary antioxidants [32] . Different studies have been indicated that the reducing properties are generally associated with the presence of reductones, which have been shown to exert antioxidant action by breaking the free radical chain by donating a hydrogen atom [33] . Similar results for reducing power activity

Table 5. Reducing power activity of phloretin.

Values are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates.

Figure 5. Reducing power activity of phloretin.

4. Conclusion

In this study, the in vitro antioxidant activity of the phytocompound phloretin was confirmed by DPPH free radical scavenging method, superoxide radical scavenging method, reducing power assay, total antioxidant activity by phosphomolybdenum method and metal chelating activity method. The IC50 value was determined for both phloretin and standard ascorbic acid. The results of this study clearly indicate that the phloretin has powerful antioxidant capacity against various reactive oxygen species by in vitro assays. It is suggested that the phloretin compound could have great importance as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of diseases and preventing or slowing the progress of aging and age associated oxidative stress related degenerative diseases.

Author Disclosure Statement

All the authors report no conflicts of interest.

NOTES

*Corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Vega, C.V., Olivares, L. and Gonzalez, J.A.M. (2013) Role of Natural Antioxidants in Cancer Disease. In Tech, 953, 1123-1128.
[2] Singh, S., Mehta, A. and Athirwal, L., et al. (2014) Combinatorial Effect of Cajanus Cajan, Silybum marianum and Andrographis Paniculata on in Vivo Antioxidant and Hepatoprotective Activities of Carbon Tetrachloride Intoxicated Albino rats. Annual Research and Review in Biology, 4, 665-674.
http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2014/6022
[3] Sharma, S. and Vig, A.P. (2013) Evaluation of in Vitro Antioxidant Properties of Methanol and Aqueous Extracts of Parkinsonia aculeta L. Leaves. The Scientific World Journal, 2013, Article ID: 604865.
[4] Das, S.K. (2012) Free Radicals, Antioxidants and Nutraceuticals in Health, Disease and Radiation Biology. Preface. Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 49, 291-292.
[5] Forman, H.J., Davies, K. and Ursini, F. (2014) How do Nutritional Antioxidants Really Work: Nucleophilic Tone and Parahormesis Versus Free Radical Scavenging in Vivo. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 66, 24-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.05.045
[6] Yu, H.H., Liu, X.G., Xing, R.E., Liu, S., Guo, Z.Y. and Wang, P.B., et al. (2006) In Vitro Determination of Antioxidant Activity of Proteins from Jellyfish Rhopilema esculentum. Food Chemistry, 95, 123-130.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.025
[7] Siddhuraju, P. and Becker, K. (2006) The Antioxidant and Free Radical Scavenging Activities of Processed Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Seed Extracts. Food Chemistry, 101, 10-19.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.004
[8] Athukorala, Y., Kim, K.N. and Jeon, Y.J. (2006) Antiproliferative and Antioxidant Properties of an Enzymatic Hydrolysate from Brown algae Ecklonia cava. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 44, 1065-1074.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2006.01.011
[9] Bombardelli, E. and Morazzoni, P. (1993) The Flavonoids: New Perspectives in Biological Activities and Therapeutics. Chimica Oggi-Chemistry Today, 11, 25-28.
[10] Middleton, E., Kandaswami, C. and Theoharides, T.C. (2000) The Effects of Plant Flavonoids on Mammalian Cells: Implications for Inflammation, Heart disease, and Cancer. Pharmacological Reviews, 52, 673-751.
[11] Auner, B.G., Valenta, C. and Hadgraft, J. (2003) Influence of Phloretin and 6-Ketocholestanol on the Skin Permeation of Sodium-Fluorescein. Journal of Controlled Release, 89, 321-328.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00124-X
[12] Blazso, G. and Gabor, M. (1995) Effects of Prostaglandin Antagonist Phloretin Derivatives on Mouse Ear Edema Induced with Different Skin Irritants. Prostaglandins, 50, 161-168.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-6980(95)00109-3
[13] Oresajo, C. (2008) Protective Effects of a Topical Antioxidant Mixture Containing Vitamin C, Ferulic acid and Phloretin against Ultraviolet-Induced Photodamage in Human Skin. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 7, 290-297.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00408.x
[14] Wu, C.-H., Ho, Y.-S., Tsai, C.-Y., Wang, Y.-J., Tseng, H., Wei, P.-L., Lee, C.-H., Liu, R.-S. and Lin, S.-Y. (2009) In Vitro and in Vivo Study of Phloretin-Induced Apoptosis in Human Liver Cancer Cells Involving Inhibition of Type II Glucose Transporter. International Journal of Cancer, 124, 2210-2219.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24189
[15] He, X. and Liu, R.H. (2007) Triterpenoids Isolated from Apple Peels have Potent Antiproliferative Activity and May Be Partially Responsible for Apple’s Anticancer Activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55, 4366-4370.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf063563o
[16] Yoon, H. and Liu, R.H. (2007) Effect of Selected Phytochemicals and Apple Extracts on NF Kappa B Activation in Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 Cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55, 3167-3173.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf0632379
[17] Shimada, K., Fujikawa, K., Yahara, K. and Nakamura, T. (1992) Antioxidative Properties of Xanthan on the Autoxidation of Soybean Oil in Cyclodextrin Emulsion. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 40, 945-948.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf00018a005
[18] Prieto, P., Pineda, M. and Aguilar, M. (1999) Spectrophotometric Quantitation of Antioxidant Capacity through the Formation of a Phosphomolybdenum Complex: Specific Application to the Determination of Vitamin E. Analytical Biochemistry, 269, 337-341.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.1999.4019
[19] Liu, F., Ooi, C.V.E. and Chang, S.T. (1997) Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Mushroom Polysaccharide Extracts. Life Sciences, 60, 763-771.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(97)00004-0
[20] Dinis, T.C.P., Madeira, V.M.C. and Almeidam, L.M. (1994) Action of Phenolic Derivates (Acetoaminophen, Salycilate, and 5-Aminosalycilate) as Inhibitors of Membrane Lipid Peroxidation and Peroxyl Radicals Scavengers. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 315, 161-169.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1994.1485
[21] Oyaizu, M. (1986) Studies on Products of Browning Reactions Antioxidant Activities of Products of Browning Reaction Prepared from Glucose Amine. Japanese Journal of Nutrition, 44, 307-315.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.44.307
[22] Majewska, M., Skrzycki, M. and Podsiad, M. (2011) Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential of Flavanoids: An in Vitro Study. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica—Drug Research, 68, 611-615.
[23] Soares, J.R., Dins, T.C.P., Cunha, A.P. and Almeida, L.M. (1997) Antioxidant Activity of Some Extracts of Thymus zygis. Free Radical Research, 26, 469-478.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10715769709084484
[24] Mokbel, W. and Hashinaga, B. (2005) The Radical Scavenging Activities of Radix puerariae Isoflavonoids: A Chemiluminescence Study. Food Chemistry, 86, 525-529.
[25] Fatimah, Z.I., Zaiton, Z., Jamaludin, M., Gapor, M.T., Nafeeza, M.I. and Khairul, O. (1998) Effect of Estrogen and Palm Vitamin E on Malondialdehyde Levels toward the Development of Arteriosclerosis in the New Zealand White Rabbit. In: Packer, L. and Ong, S.H., Eds., Biological Oxidants and Antioxidants: Molecular Mechanism and Health Effects, AOCS Press, Champaign, 22.
[26] Aliyu, A.B., Ibrahim, M.A. and Ibrahim, H. (2012) Free Radical Scavenging and Total Antioxidant Capacity of Methanol Extract of Ethulia conyzoides Growing in Nigeria. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 17, 7458-7465.
[27] Shirwaikar, A. and Punitha, I.S.R. (2007) Antioxidant Studies on the Methanol Stem Extract of Coscinium fenestratum. Natural Product Sciences, 13, 40-45.
[28] Wang, W.K., Park, H.S., Ham, I., Oh, M., Namkoong, H., Kim, H.K., Hwang, D.W., Hur, S.Y., Kim, T.E., Park, Y.G., Kim, J.R. and Kim, J.W. (2005) Natural Compounds, Fraxin and Chemically Structurally Related to Fraxin Protect Cells from Oxidative Stress. Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 37, 436-446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emm.2005.54
[29] Gülcin, I., Büyükokuroglu, M.E. and Küfrevioglu, O.I. (2003) Metal Chelating and Hydrogen Peroxide Scavenging Effects of Melatonin. Journal of Pineal Research, 34, 278-281.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-079X.2003.00042.x
[30] Halliwell, B. (1991) Reactive Oxygen Species in Living Systems: Source, Biochemistry, and Role in Human Disease. American Journal of Medicine, 91, 14-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(91)90279-7
[31] Gulcin, I., Beydemir, S., Alici, H.A. and Elmastas, M. (2004) In Vitro Antioxidant Properties of Morphine. Pharmacological Research, 49, 59-66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2003.07.012
[32] Yen, G.C. and Chen, H.Y. (1995) Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 43, 27-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf00049a007
[33] Shimada, K., Fujikawa, K., Yahara, K. and Nakamura, T. (1992) Antioxidative Properties of Xanthan on the Autoxidation of Soybean Oil in Cyclodextrin Emulsion. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 40, 945-994.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf00018a005
[34] Luo, A.X., Peng, P., Fei, W., Yang, L.Y. and Fan, Y.J. (2014) Isolation and Antioxidant Activity (In Vitro and in Vivo) of the Flavonoid from Tartarian buckwheat. Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research, 3, 168-172.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.