Share This Article:

Motivating Students to Learn Science: A Physicist’s Perspective

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:267KB) PP. 1892-1992
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2015.618203    2,405 Downloads   2,694 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

The objective of this article is to make explicit some concrete ways in which an accurate perspective of what science is contributes significantly to improving science teaching. Effective science teaching begins with the recognition that for both practising scientists and students the desire to find answers to personally meaningful questions about natural phenomena is the strongest incentive to study science. Instructional methods that nurture and draw upon the curiosity of students have the best chance to motivate students to learn science. Teaching in this way entails helping students 1) to see the conceptual relevance, utility, and aesthetic dimension of what they are studying; 2) to appreciate the need for, and power of, rational thinking in problem solving; 3) to undertake their own exploratory projects to investigate some aspect of the physical world that interests them. For science teachers to do this well, they must, themselves, a) be knowledgeable of the science they teach, b) keep abreast of advances in their areas of interest, and c) develop their own experimental and observational skills so they can teach with confidence based on personal experience.

Cite this paper

Silverman, M. (2015) Motivating Students to Learn Science: A Physicist’s Perspective. Creative Education, 6, 1892-1992. doi: 10.4236/ce.2015.618203.

References

[1] Berland, T. (1962). The Scientific Life (pp. 65-66). New York: Coward-McCann.
[2] Beverage, W. I. B. (1950). The Art of Scientific Investigation (pp. 192). New York: Vintage Books.
[3] Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction (pp. 115). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[4] Bulwer-Lytton, E. G. (1873). Kenelm Chillingly: His Adventures and Opinions (Chap. 12).
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/7658/7658-h/7658-h.htm#link2HCH0001
[5] Conover, E. (2015). Why Did You Become a Scientist? Researchers Speak Out. Science
http://news.sciencemag.org/scientific-community/2015/04/why-did-you-become-
scientist-researchers-speak-out-iamascientistbecause
[6] Curtin, D. (1982). The Aesthetic Dimension of Science (pp. 7). New York: Philosophical Library.
[7] Feyerabend, P. (1975a). How to Defend Society against Science. Radical Philosophy, 11, 3-8.
[8] Feyerabend, P. (1975b). Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. New York: New Left Books.
[9] Feynman, R. P. (1965). The Character of Physical Law (pp. 13). Cambridge: MIT Press.
[10] Fraiberg, S. (1959). The Magic Years. New York: Charles Scribner.
[11] Gould, S. (1987). The Case of the Creeping Fox Terrier Clone. Natural History, 97, 16-24.
[12] Hallam, A. (1973). A Revolution in the Earth Sciences (pp. 112-113). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[13] Mahon, B. (2004). The Man Who Changed Everything: The Life of James Clerk Maxwell. New York: Wiley.
[14] Neuman, S. (2014). 1 in 4 Americans Thinks the Sun Goes around the Earth, Survey Says. National Public Radio.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/02/14/277058739/1-in-4-americans-think
-the-sun-goes-around-the-earth-survey-says
[15] O’Neill, I. (2014). 1 in 4 Americans Don’t Know Earth Orbits the Sun. Yes, Really.
http://news.discovery.com/space/astronomy/1-in-4-americans-dont-know-earth
-orbits-the-sun-yes-really-140214.htm
[16] Raloff, J. (2010). Science Literacy: U.S. College Courses Really Count. Science News. https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/science-public/science-literacy-us-college-courses-really-count
[17] Raup, D. (1986). The Nemesis Affair (pp. 18). New York: Norton.
[18] Resnick, R., & Halliday, D. (1977). Physics (3rd ed., pp. 288-289). New York: Wiley.
[19] Sant, J. (2014). Wegner and Continental Drift Theory.
http://www.scientus.org/Wegener-Continental-Drift.html
[20] Silverman, M. P. (1992). Raising Questions: Philosophical Significance of Controversy in Science. Science & Education, 1, 163-179.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00572837
[21] Silverman, M. P. (1995). Self-Directed Learning: A Heretical Experiment in Teaching Physics. American Journal of Physics, 63, 495-508.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18080
[22] Silverman, M. P. (2009). Final Report: Force of a Ladder on a Railing under Static and Dynamic Conditions. Expert Witness Testimony (Used by Both Defendant and Plaintiff) in the Case Shattuck v. Wynfield, Hartford Superior Court (Hartford CT).
[23] Silverman, M. P. (2015). Cheating or Coincidence? Statistical Method Employing the Principle of Maximum Entropy for Judging Whether a Student Has Committed Plagiarism. Open Journal of Statistics, 5, 143-157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.52018
[24] Sreenivasan, K. R. (2004). One Hundred Reasons to Be a Scientist (pp. 1-268). Trieste: ICTP (Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics).
[25] Watts, A. (1970). Does It Matter (pp. 25)? New York: Vintage Books.
[26] Westfall, R. (1980). Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton (Chap. 10, pp. 402-406). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.