Share This Article:

Evaluation of the Performance of Two Diagnostic Assays in Malaria Diagnosis in Mashonaland East Province, Zimbabwe, 2010

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:344KB) PP. 187-196
DOI: 10.4236/ojepi.2015.53023    2,576 Downloads   2,957 Views   Citations


Introduction: Following the 2008 WHO in-vitro malaria RDT product testing study results, Paracheck RDT’s sensitivity was revealed to significantly drop to 55% at low parasite densities. This raised concerns among health workers on its diagnostic capabilities and possible public health implications resulting from its continued use? We therefore evaluated the diagnostic performance of Paracheck and SD Bioline (a yet to be evaluated kit) RDTs under operational settings in areas of different endemicity. Methods: Using an analytic cross-sectional study design, finger prick blood samples from 422 clinically diagnosed patients selected from Mudzi (high malaria burden) and Murewa (low malaria burden) districts were each tested for malaria using Paracheck and SD Bioline RDTs and Giemsa stain microscopy as gold standard. Parasitemias were calculated using WHO standard protocols. Main outcomes were test efficiency; sensitivity; specificity; PVP and NPV. Re-sults: Of eligible 390 blood slides prepared, microscopy detected malaria parasites in 125 (32.1%) with P. falciparum being predominant species (100%). Compared with microscopy, both Paracheck and SD Bioline RDTs performed fairly equally well and above WHO targets in Mudzi (high malaria burden), while in Murewa (low malaria burden) Paracheck and SD Bioline RDTs had sensitivities of 86.7% [69.5 - 100.0] and 86.7% [86.7 - 100.0]; specificities of 97.2% [94.1 - 100.0] and 90.7% [85.3 - 96.2]; test efficiencies of 95.9% [92.4 - 99.4] and 90.2% [85.0 - 95.5]; PVPs of 73.3% and 45.2%; and NPVs of 98.8% and 98.7% respectively. Sensitivities for Paracheck and SD Bioline RDTs reduced from 99.2% [97.7 - 100.0] at parasitemias above 1000/μl each to 33.3% [0.0 - 71.1] and 50.0% [10.0 - 90.0] respectively at parasitemias below 1000/μl with variations not statistically significant. Conclusion: Paracheck RDT remains the MOHCC’s preferred diagnostic alternative in areas where good quality microscopy is not available in Zimbabwe. SD Bioline RDT provides another diagnostic alternative especially in areas of high malaria burden. However performance of both kits at parasitemias below 1000/μl needs further investigation.

Cite this paper

Choto, R. , Midzi, S. , Mberikunashe, J. , Tshimanga, M. , Gombe, N. and Bangure, D. (2015) Evaluation of the Performance of Two Diagnostic Assays in Malaria Diagnosis in Mashonaland East Province, Zimbabwe, 2010. Open Journal of Epidemiology, 5, 187-196. doi: 10.4236/ojepi.2015.53023.


[1] WHO (2008) World Malaria Report. Geneva.
[2] WHO (2015) Malaria Factsheet No. 95.
[3] Bell, D., Wongsrichanalai, C. and Barnwell, J.W. (2006) Ensuring Quality and Access for Malaria Diagnosis: How Can It Be Achieved? Nature Reviews Microbiology, 4, S7-S20.
[4] Reyburn, H., Mbakilwa, H., Mwangi, R., Mwerinde, O., Olomi, R., et al. (2007) Rapid Diagnostic Tests Compared with Malaria Microscopy for Guiding Outpatient Treatment of Febrile Illness in Tanzania: Randomised Trial. BMJ, 334, 403.
[5] Molyneux, M. and Fox, R. (1993) Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria in Britain. BMJ, 306, 1175-1180.
[6] World Health Organization (1996) Management of Uncomplicated Malaria and the Use of Antimalarial Drugs for the Protection of Travellers. Report of an Informal Consultation. W.H.O./MAL/96. World Health Organization, Geneva, 98.
[7] Moody, A.H. and Chiodini, P.L. (2002) Non-Microscopic Method for Malaria Diagnosis Using OptiMAL IT, a Second-Generation Dipstick for Malaria pLDH Antigen Detection. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 59, 228-231.
[8] WHO (2006) The Use of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests. 2nd Edition.
[9] (2006) Zimbabwe Demographic Health Survey.
[10] WHO (2008) Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Performance. Results of WHO Product Testing of Malaria RDTs: Round 1.
[11] Dondorp, A.M., Nosten, F., Yi, P., Das, D., Phyo, A.P., et al. (2009) Artemisinin Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 455-467.
[12] Carrara, V.I., Zwang, J., Ashley, E.A., Price, R.N., Stepniewska, K., et al. (2009) Changes in the Treatment Responses to Artesunate-Mefloquine on the Northwestern Border of Thailand during 13 Years of Continuous Deployment. PLoS ONE, 4, e4551.
[13] Noedl, H., Socheat, D. and Satimai, W. (2009) Artemisinin-Resistant Malaria in Asia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 540-541.
[14] Beadle, C., Long, G.W., Weiss, W.R., McElroy, P.D., Maret, S.M., et al. (1994) Diagnosis of Malaria by Detection of Plasmodium falciparum HRP-2 Antigen with a Rapid Dipstick Antigen-Capture Assay. Lancet, 343, 564-568.
[15] Singh, N., Valecha, N. and Sharma, V.P. (1997) Malaria Diagnosis by Field Workers Using an Immunochromatographic Test. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 91, 396-397.
[16] Jelinek, T., Grobusch, M.P. and Harms, G. (2001) Evaluation of a Dipstick Test for the Rapid Diagnosis of Imported Malaria among Patients Presenting within the Network. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 33, 752-754.
[17] Eisen, D.P. and Saul, A. (2000) Disappearance of Pan-Malarial Antigen Reactivity Using the ICT Malaria Pf/Pv Kit Parallels Decline of Patent Parasitemia as Shown by Microscopy. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 94, 169-170.
[18] Shiff, C.J., Premji, Z. and Minjas, J.N. (1993) The Rapid Manual ParaSight®-F Test: A New Diagnostic Tool for Plasmodium falciparum Infection. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 87, 646-648.
[19] Piper, R., Lebras, J., Wentworth, L., Hunt-Cooke, A., Houze, S., et al. (1999) Immunocapture Diagnostic Assays for Malaria Using Plasmodium Lactate Dehydrogenase (pLDH). The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 60, 109-118.
[20] Oduola, A.M., Omitowoju, G.O., Sowunmi, A., Makler, M.T., Falade, C.O., et al. (1997) Plasmodium falciparum: Evaluation of Lactate Dehydrogenase in Monitoring Therapeutic Responses to Standard Antimalarial Drugs in Nigeria. Experimental Parasitology, 87, 283-289. [PubMed].
[21] Singh, N., Valecha, N., Nagpal, N.A.C., Mishra, S.S., Varma, H.S. and Subbarao, S.K. (2003) The Hospital- and Field-Based Performances of the OptiMAL Test, for Malaria Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring in Central India. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 97, 5-13.
[22] Tjitra, E. and Anstey, N.M. (2001) Will the High Rates of Post-Treatment Sexual Stage Parasitaemia Seen in Malaria-Endemic Areas Make the OptiMAL Antigen Test Unreliable in Predicting Malaria Treatment Outcome? British Journal of Haematology, 113, 255-257.
[23] Pieroni, P., Mills, C.D., Ohrt, C., Harrington, M.A. and Kain, K.C. (1998) Comparison of the ParaSight-F Test and the ICT Malaria Pf Test with the Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in Travellers. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 92, 166-169.
[25] Craig, M.H., Bredenkamp, B.L., Williams, C.H., Rossouw, E.J., Kelly, V.J., et al. (2002) Field and Laboratory Comparative Evaluation of ten Rapid Malaria Diagnostic Tests. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 96, 258-265.
[26] McMorrow, M.L., Masanja, M.I., Abdulla, S.M., Kahigwa, E. and Kachur, S.P. (2008) Challenges in Routine Implementation and Quality Control of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria—Rufiji District, Tanzania. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 79, 385-390.
[27] Mayxay, M., Pukrittayakamee, S., Newton, P.N. and White, N.J. (2004) Mixed-Species Malaria Infections in Humans. Trends in Parasitology, 20, 233-240.
[28] Harvey, S.A., Jennings, L., Chinyama, M., Masaninga, F., Mulholland, K., et al. (2008) Improving Community Health Worker Use of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests in Zambia: Package Instructions, Job Aid and Job Aid-Plus-Training. Malaria Journal, 7, 160.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.