Solvent Extraction of Nickel and Cobalt from Ammonia-Ammonium Carbonate Solution by Using LIX 84-ICNS

Abstract

In the present paper, separation of nickel and cobalt in ammonia-ammonium carbonate solution that simulates pregnant leach solution of Caron Process by solvent extraction using LIX 84-ICNS was studied. LIX 84-ICNS is a novel extractant which is still being studied, especially for nickel and cobalt separation in ammonia-ammonium carbonate solution. A series of solvent extraction tests were performed at various equilibrium pH, temperature, extractant concentration, and volume ratio of organic to aqueous solution (O/A ratio). The investigation results show that the highest nickel and cobalt extraction percentages of 99.8% and 90.3% were obtained from the extraction test at equilibrium pH of 8.75, temperature of 55°C, extractant concentration of 40% (v/v) and O/A ratio of 1/1, respectively. Oxidation of cobalt in aqueous solution prior to extraction is needed to minimize co-extraction of cobalt. Co-extracted cobalt can be decreased from 90.3% to 30.3% by mixing 1% (v/v) H2O22 in aqueous solution prior to the extraction stage. It was found that nickel and cobalt extractions by LIX 84-ICNS are endothermic processes with enthalpy changes of +171.03 and +7.64 kJ/mole, respectively. Based on constructed McCabe-Thiele Diagram, nickel extraction level of more than 99.9% can be obtained in 2 stages at O/A ratio of 0.5. The highest stripping percentages of nickel and cobalt of 98.82% and 3.16% respectively were obtained at 200 g/l H2SO4 stripping agent.

Share and Cite:

Mubarok, M. and Yunita, F. (2015) Solvent Extraction of Nickel and Cobalt from Ammonia-Ammonium Carbonate Solution by Using LIX 84-ICNS. International Journal of Nonferrous Metallurgy, 4, 15-27. doi: 10.4236/ijnm.2015.43003.

1. Introduction

Laterite ore is a major primary source of nickel and cobalt production along with sulfide ore. There are various processes that have been implemented for extracting nickel from laterite ore. Basically, those processing technologies use pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy or a combination of these routes dependent on the ore type, the availability of energy and some other specific factors [1] . A major pyrometallurgical process for nickel laterite ore is Elkem process which uses rotary dryer-rotary kiln and electric furnace to produce ferronickel or nickel matte. Elkem process usually treats high-grade saprolite ore. In addition to ferronickel and nickel matte, some other product types produced by pyrometallurgical routes are nickel pig iron (NPI) and sponge ferronickel or so-called nickel luppen [1] [2] . In contrast to hydrometallurgical processes, the above-mentioned pyrometallurgical processes cannot recover cobalt as separate by-product.

Hydrometallurgical route is commonly used to treat low-grade laterite ore of limonitic type which has relatively higher iron and cobalt contents. There are two major hydrometallurgical processing technologies that have been proven and used in industrial scale for a long time, namely Caron Process and HPAL (High Pressure Acid Leaching). Caron Process involves drying, reduction roasting of nickel laterite ores followed by leaching in ammonia-ammonium carbonate solution. Caron Process has several advantages in comparison to HPAL in terms of the susceptibility of the equipments to corrosion and the amount of the waste slurry. On the other hand, high temperatures and energy-intensive processes in upstream and downstream stages (i.e. drying, reduction roasting and nickel metal oxide reduction to nickel metal) are the drawbacks that reduce the competitiveness of Caron Process [1] . Various developments have been made to perform acid leaching of laterite ore at atmospheric pressure. The efforts are aimed at increasing leaching selectivity to iron for minimizing acid consumption as well as acid regeneration in atmospheric leaching processes using hydrochloric and nitric acids [3] - [5] .

Separation of cobalt and nickel in pregnant leach solution, either in ammonia-based or sulfuric acid solution is a difficult task due to relatively similar behaviour of these metals. Various methods for the separation of nickel and cobalt in aqueous solutions have been developed which include chemical precipitation, selective adsorption onto ion exchange resins and solvent extraction (SX). Among these methods, SX is the most frequently used technique because of its high separation factor and capacity and its compatibility with electrowinning.

Since 1980s, a number of extractants for separations of nickel and cobalt in ammoniacal solutions such as β-diketone [6] [7] and hydroxyoximes (e.g. LIX84 [8] , LIX84-I [9] , Acorga M5640 [10] [11] , and LIX84-INS [12] ) have been studied. Solvent extraction technique has been successfully implemented for separation of nickel from cobalt in ammoniacal solution at Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd., Yabulu and Cawse Nickel Mine of Norilsk Nickel, both in Australia [12] - [15] .

In the present work, separation of nickel and cobalt by solvent extraction using LIX 84-ICNS in ammonia-ammonium carbonate solution that simulates pregnant leach solution of Caron Process is discussed. LIX 84-ICNS is a novel product of BASF; its performance is still under study, especially for nickel and cobalt separation in ammonium-based solution. Key parameters of Ni-Co solvent extraction using this extractant in ammoniacal solution such as Ni and Co distribution coefficients (DNi and DCo), separation factor of Ni-Co (bNi-Co), the effects of SX variables (i.e. pH, extractant concentration, temperature, volume ratio of organic to aqueous solution) on nickel and cobalt extraction behaviour must be elucidated. It should be noted that separation of nickel and cobalt by SX in ammonia-ammonium carbonate solution is not only applicable for the pregnant-leach solution from Caron Process but also for the solution produced by re-leaching of mixed hydroxide precipitate (MHP) or mixed sulphide precipitate (MSP) from HPAL process in ammonia-ammonium carbonate solution.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The solution of LIX 84-ICNS (2-hydroxy-5-nonylacetophenone oxime) extractant and shellsol as diluent were kindly donated by PT BASF Indonesia. Chemical structure of LIX 84-ICNS is illustrated in Figure 1. Technical specification of the extractant is presented in Table 1. The extractant and the diluent were used as received without any further purification. Nickel sulphate hexahydrate (NiSO4・6H2O), cobalt sulphate heptahydrate (CoSO4・7H2O), ammonium carbonate ((NH4)2CO3), ammonia solution (NH3) and sulphuric acid solution (H2SO4) of analytical reagent grades were used for preparation of materials used in the testworks. A solution which contains 12 g/l Ni, 1 g/l Co, 45 g/l NH3 and 25 g/l CO2 was prepared that simulates a pregnant-leach solution of

Figure 1. Chemical structure of LIX 84-ICNS [18] .

Table 1. Technical specification of LIX 84-ICNS [18] .

Caron Process. A solution which contains 12 g/l Ni, 1 g/l Co, 45 g/l NH3 and 25 g/l CO2 was prepared that simulates a pregnant-leach solution of Caron Process [14] . The desired solution pH was adjusted by ammonia and sulphuric acid solution. Sulphuric acid was also used as stripping agent.

2.2. Methods

Series of extraction and stripping testworks have been conducted by using the earlier mentioned extractant and prepared solutions. In both stages, 50 cm3 of aqueous solution was contacted in a 250 cm3 beaker glass using a mechanical agitator from IKA Instrument. The agitations were performed for a sufficient period of time to attain equilibrium pH of the aqueous phase. The pH of aqueous phase was measured by using a pH-meter from Mettler-Toledo. Solution temperature was maintained at 30˚C, except it is mentioned that the experiment is done at higher temperatures. After stirring was finished, the aqueous solution was separated from the loaded extractant by using a separator funnel. Concentrations of nickel and cobalt in the aqueous phase were measured by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS). The concentrations of nickel and cobalt in organic phase at equilibrium state were calculated from the difference of the initial metals concentrations in aqueous solution and its concentrations in aqueous phase at the equilibrium.

The extraction tests were performed at various equilibrium pH, temperature, extractant concentration, and volume ratio of organic to aqueous solution (O/A ratio). To minimize co-extraction of cobalt and improving extraction selectivity, series of pre-oxidations of Co2+ to Co3+ testworks were also conducted prior to the extraction stage. After the extraction testworks were finished, series of stripping testworks were carried out under various H2SO4 concentration and O/A ratios. Isothermal extraction, isothermal stripping, and McCabe-Thiele Diagrams were constructed to determine O/A ratio and hypothetic stages required to obtain maximum nickel extraction and stripping.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of pH

The pH of aqueous solution was adjusted to values ranging between 8.0 and 9.50 using sulphuric acid or ammonia solution. Single stage extraction was carried out at 55˚C, O/A ratio 1/1 and 40% (v/v) LIX 84-ICNS. Profiles of extracted Ni and Co as a function of equilibrium pH are presented in Figure 2. The experimental results show that the extraction percentages of nickel and cobalt rises by the increased of equilibrium pH values. Maximum extracted nickel and cobalt of 99.8% and 90.3% were obtained at equilibrium pH 8.75, respectively. At this pH level, DNi, DCo and bNi-Co are 548.3, 9.3 and 58.9, respectively. Profiles of DNi, DCo and bNi-Co as a function of equilibrium pH at 55˚C, O/A ratio 1/1 and 40% (v/v) LIX 84-ICNS are depicted in Figure 3. Extraction of nickel by LIX 84-ICNS performs through the following reaction:

(1)

As has been formulated by Equation (1), during Ni extraction from aqueous solution and the formation of nickel-ammine complex ion, hydrogen ion is released by the extractant to the aqueous phase, which consequently reduces the pH of aqueous solution. If pH adjustment is not conducted, the lowering pH of aqueous solution would drive the reaction back to the left-side (releasing of metal ions back to the aqueous phase).

The experimental results show that at pH levels above 8.75, the extraction percentages of nickel and cobalt decreased. At pH levels above 8.75, the solution pH was adjusted with NH3 addition. According to Equation (1), the excess of NH3 will induce the reaction back to the left-side and tends to inhibit metal transfer to organic

Figure 2. Profiles of extracted Ni and Co as a function of equilibrium pH at 55˚C, O/A 1/1 and 40% (v/v) LIX 84-ICNS.

Figure 3. Profiles of DNi, DCo and bNi-Co as a function of equilibrium pH at 55˚C, O/A ratio 1/1 and 40% (v/v) LIX 84-ICNS.

phase. The alteration of ammonia concentration by addition of NH3 for pH adjustment gives higher impact to nickel than that to cobalt. Nickel ammonia complexes are reported to be more stable than those of cobalt [7] . Nickel can form various Ni-ammine complexes such as di-ammine, tetra-ammine and hexa-ammine. The type of Ni-ammine complex is dependent on the solution pH. Following Hu, at pH 8.5, nickel forms a complex of nickel tetra-ammine [7] . The formation of nickel tetra-ammine is the reason for the decreased of Ni extraction obtained at equilibrium pH above 8.75. Decreasing metal extractions during SX in ammoniacal solutions beyond pH 8.4 were reported by Nathsarma and Sarma [16] beyond pH 8.5 by Hu, et al. [7] and beyond pH 9 by Alguacil and Cobo [17] . According to Hu, et al., at pH 8.5, the predominant species is nickel tetra-ammine complex and the average coordination number of ammonia per mole of nickel ion is approximately 4, therefore, the decrease of nickel extraction is mainly attributed to the formation of nickel ammine species with ammonia ligands of more than 4 which is more stable in aqueous solution [7] .

3.2. Effect of Temperature

Single stage extractions of nickel and cobalt from ammonia-ammonium carbonate solution using 40% (v/v) LIX 84-ICNS and O/A 1/1 were carried out at temperatures 25˚C, 40˚C and 55˚C and various equilibrium pH. Profiles of nickel and cobalt extractions as a function of temperature and equilibrium pH are depicted in Figure 4. Theoretically, the increase of temperature tends to enhance equilibrium concentration of metal ions that can be extracted to organic phase. Moreover, at higher temperatures, the solubility of the organic phase in aqueous solution and the viscosity of organic solution is lower that leads to a better contact between the organic and the aqueous phases during mixing. The extraction is usually operated up to 80˚C - 85˚C. The operations at higher temperatures might cause degradation of the organic solution.

As can be seen in Figure 4, the increase of temperature increases both nickel and cobalt extractions. Hence, the increase of temperature enhances also distribution coefficients of nickel (DNi) and cobalt (DCo). Profiles of logD versus (1/T) for nickel and cobalt at equilibrium pH of 8.75 are illustrated in Figure 5. Linier regression lines of logD versus (1/T) for nickel and cobalt have a slope of −8.93 and −0.40, respectively which indicates that temperature give more significant influence to nickel extraction than to cobalt. The effect of temperature on equilibrium constant and the change of enthalpy (DH) of the extraction reaction follow a prominent Van’t Hoff Equation:

(2)

in which K is equilibrium constant of extraction reaction, T absolute temperature and R ideal gas constant.

Figure 4. Profiles of DNi, DCo and bNi-Co as a function of equilibrium pH at 55˚C, O/A ratio 1/1 and 40% (v/v) LIX 84-ICNS.

Figure 5. Profiles of logD versus 1/T for Ni and Co extraction at pH 8.75, O/A 1/1 and 40% (v/v) LIX 84-ICNS.

The equilibrium constant for Reaction (1) is as follow:

(3)

and its distribution ratio is defined as:

(4)

in which and are nickel concentrations in organic phase and aqueous phase at equilibrium, respectively. At constants ammonia and extractant concentrations and aqueous solution pH, the following correlation is obtained:

(5)

in which C1 is a constant. The following is the integrated form of Equation (2):

(6)

By substituting Equation (5) to Equation (6) the followings equation are obtained:

(7)

in which C = C1 + C2. The differential form of Equation (7) against (1/T) can be re-written as follow:

(8)

The value of DH can be determined from the slope of linear plot of logD versus (1/T) in which the slope is the value of −DH/(2.303R). From the profiles of logD versus (1/T) for nickel and cobalt presented in Figure 5, the values of DH obtained for nickel and cobalt extractions are +171.03 and +7.64 kJ/mole, respectively. The positive values of DH for Ni and Co extractions indicate that the extractions of Ni and Co from ammonia-ammonium carbonate solution by LIX 84-ICNS are endothermic reactions. This implies that the increase of temperature would drive the reaction to the right-side (i.e. improving extractions of Ni and Co) with more impact on Ni extraction.

3.3. Effect of Extractant Concentration

In practice, less amount of extractant used is attempted to have more competitive process in financial point of view. The investigation results show that nickel and cobalt extractions are only 65.6% and 84.7%, respectively, when the concentration of LIX 84-ICNS is 10% (v/v) at equilibrium pH of 8.75, 55˚C and O/A ratio of 1/1. In order to determine suitable extractant concentration for achieving higher nickel extraction, the extractant concentration was varied at 10%, 20% and 40% (v/v). Profiles of nickel and cobalt extraction as a function of equilibrium pH at various extractant concentrations are presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively. As expected, the extractions of nickel and cobalt increase by the increased of extractant concentration. The higher metals extraction at higher extractant concentrations is in-line with Equation (1) and (3), in which the increase of extractant concentration would shift the equilibrium reaction to the right-side that leads to the enhanced of metal extraction.

3.4. Effect of Pre-Oxidation of Aqueous Solution Prior to Extraction

It can be seen that cobalt co-extractions at various conditions presented earlier are relatively high. Therefore, series of pre-oxidations of cobalt in aqueous solution were carried out prior to the extraction stage. Divalent cobalt in aqueous solution was oxidized to trivalent form by three different methods, namely air exposure for 48h prior to extraction, solution aeration and oxidation using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Although both cobalt and nickel exist as divalent ions in aqueous solution, the trivalent cobalt ion tends to form in preference to nickel when the aqueous solution is being oxidized. This difference tendency of nickel and cobalt to form trivalent cation provides a basis for separation of these metals in ammoniacal solution using LIX 84-ICNS since the extractant only extracting Co2+ and does not reacts with Co3+. Effects of various pre-treatment methods on Ni and Co extractions are illustrated in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. The extraction testworks were conducted at 55˚C, 40% (v/v) LIX 84-ICNS and O/A ratio of 1/1.

As can be seen in Figure 8, pre-oxidation processes conducted prior to extraction does not notably influence nickel extraction. In contrast, cobalt extraction is significantly affected by pre-oxidation method of the aqueous

Figure 6. Profiles of nickel extraction as a function of equilibrium pH at various extractant concentrations, temperature 55˚C, O/A 1/1.

Figure 7. Profiles of cobalt extraction as a function of equilibrium pH at various extractant concentrations, temperature 55˚C, O/A 1/1.

Figure 8. Effects of various pre-treatments of aqueous solutions on nickel extraction at 55˚C, 40% (v/v) LIX 84-ICNS and O/A ratio 1/1.

solution prior to the extraction stage. Cobalt extraction decreased from 90.3% to 55.3%, 45.8%, and 30.3%, respectively after being treated by 48 h exposure of the aqueous solution in open-air prior to extraction, aeration for 1.5 h and oxidation using 0.5 ml of 30 wt% H2O2 in 50 mL of the aqueous solution. The oxidation using 1% (v/v) of 30 wt% H2O2 increases separation factor of Ni-Co (bNi-Co) from 58.95 without pre-treatments to 271.1 after being treated with 1% (v/v) H2O2 (Figure 10). Further investigations are still required to reduce co-ex- tracted cobalt in LIX 84-ICNS. Combined pre-oxidation have been conducted in QNI Pty Ltd., Yabulu, Australian in which the aqueous solution is aerated and followed by oxidation using H2O2 to oxidize the residual Co2+ prior to the extraction using LIX 87-QN extractant [14] .

3.5. Extraction Isotherm Diagram

Extraction isotherm diagram for nickel was constructed based on the data obtained from the extraction testworks at equilibrium pH of 8.75, temperature 55˚C, extractant concentration of 40% (v/v), O/A ratios of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0. An optimum O/A ratio must be determined in which high metal extraction at low O/A ratio is

Figure 9. Effects of various pre-treatments of aqueous solutions on cobalt extraction at 55˚C K, 40% v/v LIX 84- ICNS and O/A ratio 1/1.

Figure 10. Separation factor of Ni-Co (bNi-Co) as a function of equilibrium pH and pre-treatment methods of aqueous solution prior to extraction.

required for minimizing the organic extractant consumption and to provide higher metal concentration in organic phase. The influence of O/A ratio on nickel and cobalt extraction is shown in Figure 11. In order to determine O/A ratio and the hypothetic stages required to obtain maximum nickel extraction, McCabe-Thiele Diagram was constructed. Based on constructed McCabe-Thiele Diagram (Figure 12), it was found that nickel extraction levels of higher than 99.9% can be obtained in two stage extraction at equilibrium pH of 8.75, temperature

Figure 11. Influence of O/A ratio on nickel and cobalt extractions.

Figure 12. McCabe-Thiele Diagram constructed for nickel extraction at pH 8.75, temperature of 55˚C and LIX 84-ICNS of 40% (v/v).

55˚C and O/A ratio 0.5. This investigation results demonstrate the advantage of LIX 84-ICNS in comparison to other extractants used previously for extracting nickel in ammoniacal solutions [8] [9] . Kumar et al. reported that by using LIX 84 of 10% (v/v), maximum Ni extraction was obtained at two stage extraction under O/A ratio of 2 [8] . Parija et al. that used LIX 84-I 30% (v/v) reported three stage of extraction to obtain a maximum nickel extraction from the ammonium sulphate solution containing 20 g/l Ni at O/A ratio of 0.8 [9] . In industrial practice, QNI Yabulu that used LIX 87-QN at 30% (v/v) and O/A 1.5 requires three stage extraction to get a maximum Ni extraction [14] .

3.6. Stripping Behaviour of Nickel and Cobalt by Sulfuric Acid

Loaded organic phase was stripped under variations of H2SO4 concentrations at temperature of 80˚C and O/A ratio 1/1. Profiles of nickel and cobalt stripping percentage as a function of H2SO4 concentration are presented in Figure 13. It can be seen that the increase of H2SO4 concentration from 50 to 200 g/l enhances stripping percentage of nickel from 46.22% to 98.22%, while cobalt stripping at 200 g/l H2SO4 was only 3.16%. At 200 g/l of H2SO4, separation factor of Ni-Co (bNi-Co) is 2568. Co2+ that is co-extracted with nickel as R2Co chelate will be rapidly converted in the organic phase to R3Co chelate. This phenomenon leads to low levels of cobalt stripping.

When cobalt is in R3Co form, the stripping kinetics of is very slow [12] . Cobalt accumulated in the organic phase will increase viscosity of the organic solution [12] . In this regard, the effective way to separate cobalt from nickel in ammoniacal solutions is by performing pre-oxidations prior to the extraction stage.

Stripping isotherm diagram for nickel was constructed based on the data obtained from the stripping testworks at temperature of 80˚C, 200 g/l H2SO4, and O/A ratios between 1/1 and 5/1 by keeping the organic phase at a constant volume. It was found that the increase of O/A ratios beyond unity decreases stripping percentage of nickel as illustrated in Figure 14. The McCabe-Thiele Diagram for nickel stripping was constructed as shown in Figure 15. Based on the constructed McCabe-Thiele Diagram, nickel stripping of higher than 99.9% can be obtained by two-stage stripping at O/A ratio of 2/1.

Figure 13. Profiles of nickel and cobalt stripping percentage as a function of H2SO4 concentration at temperature of 80˚C and O/A ratio 1/1.

Figure 14. Profiles of nickel and cobalt stripping percentages as a function O/A ratio at H2SO4 concentration of 200 g/l and temperature of 80˚C.

Figure 15. McCabe-Thiele Diagram for nickel stripping at temperature of 80˚C and H2SO4 concentration 200 g/l.

4. Conclusion

The extractions of nickel and cobalt by LIX 84-ICNS from ammonia-ammonium carbonate increase by the increase of aqueous solution pH until 8.75. At pH levels beyond 8.75, the extraction percentage of nickel and cobalt decreases due to the formation of nickel and cobalt ammine-complexes that are more stable in aqueous solution. Extractions of nickel and cobalt by LIX 84-ICNS from ammonia-ammonium carbonate solution are endothermic with enthalpies of +171.03 and +7.64 kJ/mole, respectively. Temperature gives greater effect on nickel than cobalt. Pre-oxidation of cobalt in aqueous solution by 1% (v/v) 30 wt% H2O2 significantly reduces co-extraction of cobalt from 90.3% to 30.3%. Based on constructed McCabe-Thiele Diagram, nickel extraction levels of higher than 99.9% can be obtained in two-stage extraction at equilibrium pH of 8.75, temperature of 55˚C and O/A ratio of 1/2. Nickel stripping of 98.22% was obtained at H2SO4 concentration of 200 g/l, temperature of 80˚C, O/A of 1/1 with co-stripped cobalt of 3.16%. Based on constructed McCabe-Thiele Diagram, nickel stripping higher than 99.9% can be obtained by two-stage stripping using 200 g/l H2SO4 at O/A ratio of 2/1 and temperature of 80˚C.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank BASF that has provided LIX 84-ICNS extractant and shellsol as diluents used in this research work.

NOTES

*Corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Dalvi, A.D., Bacon, W.G. and Osborne, R.C. (2004) The Past and the Future of Nickel Laterites. PDAC 2004 International Conference Trade Show and Investors Exchange, Toronto, 7-10 March 2004, 1-27.
[2] Yildirim, H., Morcali, H., Turan, A. and Yucel, O. (2013) Nickel Pig Iron Production from Lateritic Nickel Ores. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Ferroalloys Congress: Efficient Technologies in Ferroalloy Industry, Almaty, 9-13 June 2013, 237-244.
[3] McDonald, R. and Whittington, B. (2008) Atmospheric Acid Leaching of Nickel Laterites Review. Part I. Sulphuric Acid Technologies. Hydrometallurgy, 91, 35-55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.11.009
[4] McDonald, R. and Whittington, B. (2008) Atmospheric Acid Leaching of Nickel Laterites Review. Part II. Chloride and Bio-Technologies. Hydrometallurgy, 91, 56-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.11.010
[5] Direct Nickel (2014).
http://www.directnickel.com/our-process/
[6] Przeszlakowski, S. and Wydra, H. (1982) Extraction of Nickel, Cobalt, and Other Metals (Cu, Zn, Fe) with a Commercial β-Diketone Extractant. Hydrometallurgy, 8, 49-64.
[7] Hu, J., Chen, Q., Hu, H., Qiu, B., Xie, A. and Yin, Z. (2012) Extraction Behaviour of Nickel in Ammoniacal Sulfate Solution with Sterically Hindered β-Diketone. Separation and Purification Technology, 95, 136-143.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.05.007
[8] Kumar, V., Pandey, B.D. and Bagchi, D. (1991) Application of LIX 84 for Separation of Copper, Nickel, and Cobalt in Ammoniacal Leaching of Ocean Nodules. Materials Transactions, 32, 157-163.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2320/matertrans1989.32.157
[9] Parija, C., Reddy, B.R. and Sarma, P.V.R.B. (1998) Recovery of Nickel from Solution Containing Ammonium Sulphate using LIX84I. Hydrometallurgy, 49, 255-261.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(98)00027-9
[10] Alguacil, F.J. and Cobo, A. (1998) Extraction of Nickel from Ammoniacal/Ammonium Carbonate Solutions Using Acorga M5640 in Iberfluid. Hydrometallurgy, 50, 143-151.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(98)00047-4
[11] Sridhar, V., Verma, J.K. and Shenoy, N.S. (2010) Separation of Nickel from Copper in Ammoniacal/Ammonium Carbonate Solution using ACORGA M5640 by Selective Stripping. Minerals Engineering, 23, 454-456.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2009.12.001
[12] Mackenzie, M., Virnig, M. and Feather, A. (2006) The Recovery of Nickel from High-Pressure Acid Leach Solutions Using Mixed Hydroxide Product—LIX 84-INS Technology. Minerals Engineering, 19, 1220-1233.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2006.01.003
[13] Flett, D.S. (2004) Cobalt-Nickel Separation in Hydrometallurgy: A Review. Chemistry for Sustainable Development, 12, 81-91.
[14] Fittock, J.E. (1992) Nickel and Cobalt Refining at QNI Pty Ltd Yabulu Queensland. AUSIMM Monograph, 19, 1-47.
[15] Habashi, F. (1997) Handbook of Extractive Metallurgi, Volume II: Primary Metals, Secondary Metals, Light Metals. Wiley-VCH, Heidelberg.
[16] Nathsarma, K.C. and Sarma, P.V.R. (1993) Processing of Ammoniacal Solutions Containing Copper, Nickel, and Cobalt for Metal Separation. Hydrometallurgy, 33, 197-210.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-386X(93)90014-5
[17] Alguacil, F.J. and Cobo, A. (1998) Separation of Copper and Nickel from Ammoniacal/Ammonium Carbonate Solutions Using Acorga PT5050. Separation Science and Technology, 33, 2257-2264.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01496399808545726
[18] LIX 84 -ICNS Technical Information, Global Mining Solution-BASF, 2013. www.basf.com/miningsolutions

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.