Share This Article:

Redefining Technology Role in Education

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:64KB) PP. 130-135
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2011.22018    6,835 Downloads   14,646 Views   Citations


The paper is a conceptual attempt to explore the new roles of technology in education which has increasingly become more than a sole medium, as was its description in the past. Basically, the key idea is that technology, with the powers of ICT, in education has now three main roles, namely: a medium/resource, a management, and a delivery. These new roles, when combined, could set the stage for restructuring the education institutions in an innovative way that leaves the current education system in history.

Cite this paper

Musawi, A. (2011). Redefining Technology Role in Education. Creative Education, 2, 130-135. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.22018.


[1] Association for Educational Communications and Technology (2004). The meanings of educational technology, definition and terminology committee. Document #MM4.0 (1 June 2004).
[2] Alison, H., & Alison, G. (2010). Shifting paradigms: Teaching, learning and web 2.0. Reference Services Review, 38, 621-633. doi:10.1108/00907321011090764
[3] Garlikov, R. (n. d.). The Socratic method: Teaching by asking instead of by telling. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
[4] Garrido, S. (2002). Webstorming: Brainstorming in the web. In M. Driscoll and T. Reeves (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2002 (pp. 2601-2602). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
[5] Garson, G. David (2000). The Role of Technology in Quality Education. Retrieved 17 February 2011. AB&usg=AFQjCNGpExLngIPmkuKkBDUUriUkR5xbdA.
[6] Idrus, R. (2005). From Facilitation to the Transformation of Learning: From Pedagogy to Technogogy. In Proceedings of the 5th International Educational Technology Conference: Distance Education, 21-23 September 2005, Sakarya, Turkey.
[7] Kandlbinder, P. (2004). Reconstructing educational technology: A critical analysis of online teaching and learning in the university. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, School of Policy and Practice, Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney.
[8] Kinuthia, W. Laurie, B. D., & Clarke, P. A. J. (2010). Development of pedagogical technology integration content knowledge in preparing mathematics pre-service teachers: the role of instructional case analyses and reflection, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18, 645-669.
[9] Kissane, B. (2003). Three roles for technology: Towards a humanistic renaissance in mathematics education, Murdoch University, Australia. Retrieved 17 February 2011. DA&ved=0CBUQFjAD&usg=AFQjCNHKJ0M9PnEbmThb1BogHE-K9ozFPg
[10] Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical e-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 24-33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x
[11] Landen, Mary (1997). The role of technology in education and training, Industrial and Commercial Training, 29, 230–235. doi:10.1108/00197859710190751
[12] Masood, M. (2004). A ten year analysis: Trends in traditional educational technology literature. The Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 1.
[13] Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher College Record, 108, 1017-1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
[14] Kumar, S. (2009). Undergraduate perceptions of the usefulness of web 2.0 in higher education: Survey development. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on e-Learning, Bari: the University of Bari.
[15] Rempel, P., Montgomerie, T.C., & Szabo, M. (1998). IT roles and competencies: Are we prepared for the 21st century. In Proceedings of ED-Media/ED-Telecom 98 (pp. 1133-1138). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
[16] Richard, B. (2009). The Effect of Web 2.0 on Teaching and Learning, Teacher Librarian, 37, 52-53.
[17] Roblyer, M. D. (2005). Educational technology research that makes a difference: Series introduction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5, 192-201.
[18] Rutz, E., Eckart, R., Wade, J. E., Maltbie, C., Rafter, C., & Elkins, V. (2003). Student performance and acceptance of instructional technology: Comparing technology-enhanced and traditional instruct- tion for a course in statics. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 133-140.
[19] Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2.
[20] Spence, M., & Haughey, M. (2005). Issues and challenges of instructional technology specialists in alberta colleges. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31, Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
[21] Topcu, A., & Ubuz, B. (2008). Effects of the asynchronous webbased course: Pre-service teachers’ achievement, metacognition, and attitudes towards the course. Educational Technology and Society, 11, 181-197.
[22] Vijayakumar, S. (2011). Using technology for brainstorming in a writing class: An innovative approach. Journal of Technology for English Language Teachers, 1.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.