Evaluation of a Heterogeneous Sensor Network Architecture for Highly Mobile Users

Chen Zhong, Jens Eliasson, Rumen Kyusakov, Jerker Delsing

.

DOI: 10.4236/cn.2011.32008                

Abstract

This paper presents experimental results of a heterogeneous sensor network architecture, which is a combination of a wireless sensor network and a personal area network. The proposed architecture uses the IEEE 802.15.4 standard to transmit sensor data to a sensor node which in turn forwards the data using TCP/IP to a database on the Internet via a Bluetooth-equipped mobile phone and the mobile telephone access network. The performance of the entire communication chain is evaluated. First, a 3G network's performance is evaluated by measuring its round trip time for packet transmission. Second, the real-world end-to-end delay between a sensor node and a database server on the Internet is measured using two different experimental set-ups: single-hop transmission and two hops transmission. Finally, the proposed architecture's scalability is estimated in a Matlab simulation using the results of the experiments as a base. The results show that the proposed architecture is applicable for small-scale sensor networks used by highly mobile users.

Keywords

Wsn, PAN, Mobile Sensor Network, Scalability, Experimental

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler and J. Anderson, “Wireless Sensor Networks for Habitat Moni- Toring,” ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA’02), Atlanta, September 2002, pp. 88-97.
[2]	N. Alsharabi, L. R. Fa, F. Zing and M. Ghurab, “Wireless Sensor Networks of Battlefields Hotspot: Challenges and Solutions,” WIOPT 2008—6th International ICST Symposium on Modeling and Optimization, 30 March 2008, pp. 192-196.
[3]	M. H. P. Jr. Hanson, A. Barth, K. Ringgenberg, B. Calhoun, J. Aylor and J. Lach, “Body Area Sensor Networks: Challenges and Opportunities,” IEEE Computer, January 2009, January 2009, pp. 58-65.
[4]	L. Steenkamp, S. Kaplan and R. Wilkinson, “Wireless Sensor Network Gateway,” AFRICON’ 09, 23-25 Sep- tember, 2009, pp. 1-6.
[5]	J. Eliasson, C. Zhong and J. Delsing, “A Heterogeneous Sensor Network Architecture for Highly Mobile Users,” 6th IEEE Conference on Wireless Communication and Sensor Network (WCSN-2010), Allahabad, 2010, pp. 1-6.
[6]	IEEE, “IEEE Standard for Information Technology— Telecommunications and Information Exchange between Systems—Local and Metropolitan area Networks Specific Requirements.” http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.15.4-2003.pdf
[7]	Bluetooth Special Interest Group, 2011. http://www.bluetooth.org/
[8]	Z. Shelby, “Embedded Web Services,” IEEE Wireless Communications, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2010, pp. 52-57. doi:10.1109/MWC.2010.5675778
[9]	A. van Halteren, R. Bults, K. Wac, D. Konstantas, I. Widya, N. Dokovsky, G. Koprinkov, V. Jones and R. Herzog, “Mobile Patient Monitoring: The MobiHealth System,” The Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2004, pp. 365-373.
[10]	A. Milenkovic, C. Otto and E. Jovanov, “Wireless Sensor Networks for Personal Health Monitoring: Issues and an Implementation,” Computer Communications, Vol. 29, August 2006, pp. 2521-2533. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2006.02.011
[11]	J. Zheng and M. Lee, “A Comprehensive Performance, Study of IEEE 802.15.4,” In: S. Phoha, T. F. La Porta, C. Griffin, Eds., Sensor Network Operations, Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken, 2006, pp. 218-237.
[12]	J. Rousselot, M. Aoun and R. S. Oliver, “Accurate Timeliness Simulations for Real-Time Wireless Sensor Networks,” 3rd UKSim European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation, Athens, 25-27 November, 2009, pp. 476-481.
[13]	The Mulle platform, 2011. http://www.eistec.se/
[14]	AT86RF230, 2011. http://www.atmel.com/
[15]	Tinyos, 2011. http://www.tinyos.net/