Share This Article:

Comparison of Cardiac Output Measurement by Noninvasive Method with Electrical Cardiometry and Invasive Method with Thermodilution Technique in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:1214KB) PP. 123-130
DOI: 10.4236/wjcs.2014.47019    2,365 Downloads   3,210 Views   Citations


Objective: This study was conducted to compare the cardiac output by using Electrical Cardiometry (EC), a noninvasive method of continuous cardiac output monitoring during cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) derived cardiac output. Design: Prospective observational clinical study. Setting: Cardiac surgery operating room of a tertiary care cardiac center. Participants: Twenty five patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 150 double data of cardiac output were compared with Thermodilution Cardiac Output (TDCO) and Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance (TEBCO). The TDCO value ranges from 1.8-6.9 litre·min-1 with a mean of 4.39 ± 1.16 litre·min-1 and TEBCO ranges from 1.8-7.1 litre·min-1 with a mean of 4.21 ± 1.16 litre·min-1. The averaged Bland-Altman analysis for TDCO and TEBCO revealed that a mean bias was 0.18 and limit of agreement was -1.25 - 0.89 litre·min-1 and the percentage error (PE) ranged from 22%-32%. The precision for the TDCO was measured to be ±16.2% and the precision for TEBCO was ±19.6%. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis between TDCO and TEBCO with a cutoff of 15% shows a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 63 and area under ROC curve of 0.80. Mountain plot between TDCO and TEBCO shows that a median percentile is 0.25 and value of 97.5 percentile is 1.525. Conclusions: The present study indicates that the electric cardiometry device yields numerically comparable results to cardiac outputs derived from the PAC during the cardiac surgery. Therefore, electrical cardiometry can be used to evaluate haemodynamic variables with clinically acceptable accuracy, when invasive methods are to be avoided or not available.

Cite this paper

Rajput, R. , Das, S. , Chauhan, S. , Bisoi, A. and Vasdev, S. (2014) Comparison of Cardiac Output Measurement by Noninvasive Method with Electrical Cardiometry and Invasive Method with Thermodilution Technique in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 4, 123-130. doi: 10.4236/wjcs.2014.47019.


[1] Dellinger, R.P., Carlet, J.M., Masur, H., et al. (2004) Surviving Sepsis Campaign Management Guidelines Committee. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. Critical Care Medicine, 32, 858-873.
[2] Shoemaker, W.C., Wo, C.C., Chan, L., et al. (2001) Outcome Prediction of Emergency Patients by Noninvasive Haemodynamic Monitoring. Chest, 120, 528-537.
[3] Swan, H.J.C., Ganz, W., Forrester, J., et al. (1970) Catheterization of the Heart in Man with Use of a Flow-Directed Balloon-Tipped Catheter. The New England Journal of Medicine, 283, 447-451.
[4] De Waal, E.E.C., De Rossi, L. and Buhre, W. (2006) Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Anaesthesist, 55, 713-730.
[5] Connors Jr., A.F., Castele, R.J., Farhat, N.Z., et al. (1985) Complications of Right Heart Catheterization. A Prospective Autopsy Study. Chest, 88, 567-572.
[6] Peters, S.G., Afessa, B., Decker, P.A., et al. (2003) Increased Risk Associated with Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in the Medical Intensive Care Unit. Journal of Critical Care, 18, 166-171.
[7] Robin, E.D. (1987) Death by Pulmonary Artery Flow-Directed Catheter. Time for a Moratorium? Chest, 92, 727-731.
[8] Chaney, J.C. and Derdak, S. (2002) Minimally Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring for the Intensivist: Current and Emerging Technology. Critical Care Medicine, 30, 2338-2345.
[9] Bland, J.M. and Altman, D.G. (1986) Statistical Method for Assessing Agreement between two Methods of Clinical Measurements. Lancet, 8476, 307-310.
[10] Critchley, L.A. and Critchley, J.A. (1999) A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 15, 85-91.
[11] Cecconi, M., Rhodes, A., Poloniecki, J., et al. (2009) Bench-to-Bedside Review: The Importance of the Precision of the Reference Technique in Method Comparison Studies—With Specific Reference to the Measurement of Cardiac Output. Critical Care, 13, 201.
[12] Cook, N.R. (2010) Methods of evaluating novel biomarkers—A New Paradigm. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 64, 1723-1727.
[13] Krouwer, J.S. and Monti, K.L. (1995) A Simple, Graphical Method to Evaluate Laboratory Assays. European Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, 33, 525-527.
[14] Mackenzie, J.D., Haites, N.E. and Rawles, J.M. (1986) Method of Assessing the Reproducibility of Blood Flow Measurement: Factors Influencing the Performance of Thermodilution Cardiac Output Computers. British Heart Journal, 55, 14-24.
[15] Stetz, C.W., Miller, R.G., Kelly, G.E. and Raffin, T.A. (1982) Reliability of the Thermodilution Method in the Determination of Cardiac Output in Clinical Practice. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 126, 1001-1004.
[16] Spiess, B.D., Patel, M.A., Soltow, L.O. and Wright, I.H. (2001) Comparison of Bioimpedance versus Thermodilution Cardiac Output during Cardiac Surgery: Evaluation of a Second-Generation Bioimpedance Device. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 15, 567-573.
[17] Sageman, W.S., Riffenburg, R.H. and Spiess, B.D. (2002) Equivalance of Bioimpedeceand Thermodilution in Measuring Cardiac Index after Cardiac Surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 16, 8-14.
[18] Gujjar, A.R., Muralidhar, K., Banakal, S., Gupta, R., Sathyaprabha, T.N. and Jairaj, P.S. (2008) Non Invasive Cardiac Output by Trans Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance in Post Cardiac Surgery Patients: Comparison with Thermodilution Method. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 22, 175-180.
[19] Suttner, S., Schollhorn, T., Boldt, J., Mayer, J., Rohm, K.D., Lang, K., et al. (2006) Non Invasive Assessment of Cardiac Output Using Trans Thoracicelectrical Bioimpedance in Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients after Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with Pulmonary Artery Dilution. Intensive Care Medicine, 32, 2053-2058.
[20] Chakravarthy, M., Rajeev, S. and Jawali, V. (2009) Cardiac Index Measurement by Invasive, Semi Invasive and Non Invasive Techniques: A Prospective Studying Postoperative Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Patients. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 23, 175-180.
[21] Sharma, V., Singh, A., Kansara, B. and Karlekar, A. (2011) Comparison of Transthoracic Electrical Bioimpedance Cardiac Output Measurement with Thrmodilution Method in Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 14, 104-110.
[22] Marik, P.E., Pendelton, J.E. and Smith, R. (1997) A Comparison of Hemodynamic Parameters Derived from Transthoracic Electrical Bioimpedance with Those Parameters Obtained by Thermodilution and Ventricular Angiography. Critical Care Medicine, 25, 1545-1550.
[23] Wang, D.J. and Gottlieb, S.S. (2006) Impedance Cardiography: More Questions than Answers. Current Cardiology Reports, 8, 180-186.
[24] Sathyaprabha, T.N., Pradhan, C., Rashmi, G., Thennarasu, K. and Raju, T.R. (2008) Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement by Transthoracic Electrical Bioimpedence: Influence of Age and Gender. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 22, 401-408.
[25] Imai, M., Hanaoka, Y. and Kemmotsu, O. (1994) Valve Injury: A New Complication of Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 78, 1041-1046.
[26] Heath, K.J., Woulfe, J., Lownie, S., et al. (1998) A Devastating Complication of Inadvertent Carotid Artery Puncture. Anesthesiology, 89, 1273-1275.
[27] Muralidhar, K. (1998) Complication of Femoral Artery Pressure Monitoring. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 12, 128-129.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.