Share This Article:

Ordinary Biodiversity, Local Stakeholders and Forest Management as a Driver for Regional Sustainable Development

Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:486KB) PP. 249-258
DOI: 10.4236/ojf.2014.43032    3,907 Downloads   5,120 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The protection of biodiversity which had long been bounded up with emblematic “natural” spaces is now increasingly focusing on ordinary biodiversity and rural agricultural land and forests as well as on urban and peri-urban spaces. Such ordinary biodiversity has its own specific features which make it both a relative and uncertain topic of research. Traditional nature protection instruments do not work on this dimension of the planet’s living tissue and new tools need to be deployed in conjunction with regional and local stakeholders that will provide long-term sustainable solutions for biodiversity and for local and regional development more generally. Research conducted on the Plateau de Millevaches explores the possibilities for shared caring for this biodiversity.

Cite this paper

Brédif, H. and Simon, L. (2014) Ordinary Biodiversity, Local Stakeholders and Forest Management as a Driver for Regional Sustainable Development. Open Journal of Forestry, 4, 249-258. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2014.43032.

References

[1] Arnstein, S. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
[2] Barbault, R. (2006). Un éléphant dans un jeu de quilles. L’homme dans la biodiversité. Paris: Seuil.
[3] Bastolla, U., Fortuna, M. A., Pascual-García, A., Ferrera, A., Luque, B., & Bascompte, J. (2009). The Architecture of Mutualistic Networks Minimizes Competition and Increases Biodiversity. Nature, 458, 1018-1020.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07950
[4] Beierle, T. C. (2002). The Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions. Risk Analysis, 22, 739-749.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00065
[5] Blandin, P. (1992). De l'écosystème à l'écocomplexe. In M. Jollivet (Ed.), Entre Nature et Société, les passeurs de frontière (pp. 267-279). Paris: Editions du CNRS.
[6] Brédif, H., Arnould, P., & Bailly, A. (2010). Recherche des voies, conditions et moyens d’une prise en charge renforcée des enjeux de la biodiversité par les propriétaires et les gestionnaires forestiers. In I. Bonhême, & C. Millier (Eds.), Programme “Biodiversité et Gestion Forestière”, résultats scientifiques et acquis pour les gestionnaires et décideurs, projets 2005-2009 (pp. 29-43). Paris: GIP Ecofor-MEEDDM.
[7] Chevassus-au-Louis, B. (2012). Les services écologiques des forêts : définition des concepts, origine et typologies. Revue Forestière Francaise, LXIV, 3, 213-223.
[8] Fahrig, L., Baudry, J., Brotons, L., Burel, F. G., Crist, T. O., Fuller, R. J., Sirami, C., Siriwardena, G. M., & Martin, J.-L. (2010). Functional Landscape Heterogeneity and Animal Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes. Ecology Letters, 14, 101-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x
[9] Fischer, A., & Young, J. C., (2007). Understanding Mental Constructs of Biodiversity: Implications for Biodiversity Management and Conservation. Biological Conservation, 136, 271-282.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.024
[10] Fleury, C., & Prévost-Julliard, A. C. (2012). L’exigence de la réconciliation. Biodiversité et société. Paris: Editions Fayard.
[11] Foltête, J.-C., Clauzel, C., Vuidel, G., & Tournant, P. (2012). Integrating Graph-Based Connectivity Metrics into Species Distribution Models. Landscape Ecology, 27, 557-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9709-4
[12] Gaston, K. J., & Fuller, R. A. (2008). Commonness, Population Depletion and Conservation Biology, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 1419-1426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.001
[13] Godet, L. (2010). La “nature ordinaire dans” le monde occidental. L’Espace Géographique, 4/10, 295-308.
[14] Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
[15] Julliard, R., Clavel, J., Devictor, V., Jiguet, F., & Couvet, D. (2006). Spatial Segregation of Specialists And Generalists in Bird Communities. Ecology Letters, 9, 1237-1244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00977.x
[16] Lawrence, A. (2006). No Personal Motive? Volunteers, Biodiversity, and the False Dichotomies of Participation. Ethics, Place and Environment, 9, 279-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13668790600893319
[17] Lennon, J. J., Beale, C. M., Reid, C., Kent, M., & Pakeman, R. (2011). Are Richness Patterns of Common and Rare Species Equally Well Explained by Environmental Variables? Ecography, 34, 529-539.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06669.x
[18] Linglart, M. (2000). La biodiversité végétale des ilots boisés en terre de grande culture. Approche ethnoécologique, exemple du Gatinais occidental. Thèse de doctorat en ethnoécologie, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle.
[19] Linglart, M., & Blandin P. (2006). La biodiversité des petits bois, “anthroposystèmes insulaires” dans les plaines de grande cultures: L’exemple du Gatinais occidental. Annales de Géographie, 651, 569-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/ag.651.0569
[20] Londeau, A. C., & Straka, T. J. (2013). Family Forest Owners’ Motivation to Control Understory Vegetation: Implications for Consulting Forestry. Open Journal of Forestry, 3, 99-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2013.34016
[21] Lynam, T., de Jong, W., Sheil, D., Kusumanto, T., & Evans, K., (2007) A Review of Tools for Incorporating Community Knowledge, Preferences, and Values into Decision Making in Natural Resources Management. Ecology and Society, 12, 5.
[22] MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 203 p.
[23] Mimet, A., Houet, T., Julliard, R., & Simon, L. (2013). Assessing Functional Connectivity: A Landscape Approach for Handling Multiple Ecological Requirements. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 453-463.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12024
[24] Miller, J. R., & Hobbs, R. J. (2002). Conservation Where People Live and Work. Conservation Biology, 16, 330-337.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00420.x
[25] Ostrom, E. (2000). Reformulating the Commons. Swiss Political Science Review, 6, 29-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2000.tb00285.x
[26] Périgord, M. (1993). La notion de paysage de montagne en Limousin. Norois, 159, 481-496.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/noroi.1993.6503
[27] Stringer, L. C., Prell, C., Reed, M. S., Hubacek, K., Fraser, E. D. G., & Dougill, A. J. (2006). Unpacking “Participation” in the Adaptive Management of Socio-Ecological Systems: A Critical Review. Ecology and Society, 11, 39.
[28] Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder Participation for Environmental Management: A Literature Review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417-2431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
[29] Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science Technology and Human Values, 25, 3-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
[30] Thompson, R., & Starzomski, B. M. (2006). What Does Biodiversity Actually Do? A Review for Managers and Policy Makers. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 1359-1378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6232-9
[31] Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S., & Aarts, N. (2010). How Participation Creates Citizens: Participatory Governance as Performative Practice. Ecology and Society, 15, 26-35.
[32] Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.