Multicriteria Assessment of Various Onsite Wastewater Treatment Options for Nigeria

Abstract

Eight onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) were evaluated for suitability of application in Nigeria for efficient treatment and disposal of domestic wastewater, using analytic network process (ANP). Ten location related risks were used as criteria in the decision making process. Expert views were used to obtain pairwise comparison matrices of the OWTSs with respect to the criteria. Saaty’s Super Decision Software was used to complete the ranking process. The order of ranking obtained was as follows: septic tank with absorption field (0.1502) > septic tank with soakaway (0.142) > composting toilet (0.128) > septic tank with sand filter (0.125) > septic tank with constructed wetland (0.12) > septic tank with holding tank (0.12) > septic tank with mound system (0.118) > septic tank with recirculating sand filter (0.096). However, when the costs and life spans of these systems were incorporated into the ranks, and considering other factors, the septic tank with absorption field stood out as the best option. A simple sensitivity analysis shows that depth to water table, proximity to drinking water, susceptibility to flooding and proximity to large roots have the highest influence on the ranks of OWTSs.

Share and Cite:

C. Nnaji, C. Ekechukwu, F. Onyia and C. Afangideh, "Multicriteria Assessment of Various Onsite Wastewater Treatment Options for Nigeria," Journal of Environmental Protection, Vol. 5 No. 2, 2014, pp. 135-143. doi: 10.4236/jep.2014.52017.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] E. Omenka, “Improvement of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment in Asaba, Nigeria,” Master’s Thesis, Lund University, Lund, 2010.
[2] USEPA, “Draft Guidelines for Management of Onsite/ Decentralised Wastewater Systems,” Office of Wastewater Management, Washington DC, Federal Register, Vol. 65, No. 195, 2010, pp. 59840-59842.
[3] T. R. Bounds, “Design and Performance of Septic Tanks,” Conference of the American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1997.
[4] A. S. Collick, M. Z. Eaton, A. F. Montalto, B. Gao, Y. Kim, L. Day and S. T. Steenhuis, “Hydrological Evaluation of Septic Disposal Field Design in Sloping Terrain”, Journal of Environmental Engineering (ASCE), Vol. 132, No. 10, 2006, pp. 1289-1297.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:10(1289)
[5] S. Hoban, P. Troth, J. Ramsey, G. D. Mc Glothin and K. Nassar, “Onsite Wastewater Demonstration Project,” NAU College of Engineering and Technology, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5600, 2012.
[6] D. L. Anderson, R. L. Siegrist and R. J. Otis, “Technology Assessment of Intermittent Sand Filters,” USEPA Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, 1989.
[7] P. M. Geary and E. A. Gardner, “Sustainable On-Site Treatment Systems, Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems,” American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, 1998.
[8] M. Yates, “Septic Tank Density and Groundwater Contamination,” Groundwater, Vol. 23, No. 5, 1985, pp. 586-591.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1985.tb01506.x
[9] M. R. Scalf, W. J. Dulap and J. P. Kreissel, “Environmental Effects of Septic Tank Systems,” US Environmental Protection Agency 18, EPA-600/3-77-096, 1977.
[10] P. A. Jelliffe, “Managing of On-Site Effluent Disposal: Conclusions from a Study on the Performance of 101 Systems in Maroochy Shire, Queensland, Australia,” Report Prepared for Maroochy Shire Council, 1995.
[11] W. Ahmed, R. Neller and M. Katouli, “Evidence of Septic System Failure Determined by a Bacterial Biochemical Fingerprinting Method,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 98, No. 4, 2005, pp. 910-920.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02522.x
[12] T. J. Bicki, “Septic Systems: Operation and Maintenance of On-site Sewage Disposal Systems,” Land and Water, No. 15, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011
[13] B. Gutterer, L. Sesse, T. Panzerbieter and T. Reckerzugel, “Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems (DEWATS) and Sanitation in Developing Countries: A Practical Guide,” Water Engineering and Development Centre, WEDC, London, 2009.
[14] Washington Department of Health, “Understanding and Caring for Your Sand-Filter System,” Publication No. 337-089, Wastewater Management Section, 2011.
[15] C. Solomon, P. Cassey, C. Mackne and A. Lake, “Recirculating Sand Filters,” Environmental Technology Initiative Factsheet, National Small Flows Clearinghouse Publishers, West Virginia University, 1998.
[16] P. Casey, S. Hagye, A. Lake, M. Kemp-Rye and K. Frame, “Mounds: A Septic System Alternative,” Environmental Technology Initiative Factsheet, National Small Flows Clearinghouse Publishers, West Virginia University, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1999.
[17] G. M. Powell, B. L. Dallemond and K. R. Manklin, “Rock-Plant Filter Design and Construction for Home Wastewater Systems,” MF-2340, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, 1998.
[18] USEPA, “Composting Toilet, Water Efficiency,” Technology Fact Sheet, EPA 832-F-99-066, Washington DC, 1999.
[19] J. C. Agunwamba, “Water Engineering and Management Tools,” Immaculate Publications Limited, Enugu, 2000.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.