Share This Article:

Comparison of Partner Choice between Lesbians and Heterosexual Women

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:123KB) PP. 134-141
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2014.52021    4,512 Downloads   6,390 Views   Citations


Studies comparing preferred partner selection between homosexual and heterosexual women have shown that homosexual women exhibit patterns of choice that resemble both the heterosexual men and heterosexual women. This intersection between groups indicates that some characteristics valued by women may be intermediate between homosexual men and heterosexual women. This selection appears to be influenced by the type of relationship of the individual. Heterosexual women emphasize preference for characteristics related to physical health in short-term relationships. In long-term relationships, the emphasis is on the characteristics of good provision of resources and emotional investment. This study aimed to compare the preferences of the two groups of women in partner choice in the types of relationships mentioned. The participants were 100 homosexual and 55 heterosexual women in reproductive period. A questionnaire was used to collect information. The participants were contacted by indication, in LGBT bars or associations. There were similarities between groups with regard to the choices they made. The Macro-category attachment formation was requested more in the long-term and good genes was more appreciated in the short term. However, in both short and long term relationships homosexuals appreciated good genes more than heterosexuals. Heterosexual women valued good provision of resources more in long-term relationships. The reasons for these differences could be several, starting from social aspects all the way up to biological ones.

Cite this paper

Veloso, V. , Brito, R. & Câmara, C. (2014). Comparison of Partner Choice between Lesbians and Heterosexual Women. Psychology, 5, 134-141. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.52021.


[1] Altafim, E. R. P., Lauandos, J. M., & Caramaschi, S. (2009). Selecao de parceiros: Diferencas entre generos em diferentes contextos. Psicologia e argumento, 27, 117-129.
[2] Bailey, J. M., Gaulin, S., Agyei, Y., & Gladue, B. A. (1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1081-1093.
[3] Balthazart, J. (2012). Sex differences suggest homosexuality is an endocrine phenomenon. The biology of homosexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[4] Borrione, R. T. M., & Lordelo, E. R. (2005). Escolha de parceiros e investimento parental: Uma perspectiva desenvolvimental. Interacao em Psicologia, 9, 35-43.
[5] Brown, W. M., Finn, C. J., Cooke, B. M., & Breedlove, S. M. (2002). Differences in finger length ratios between self-identified “butch” and “femme” lesbians. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 117-121.
[6] Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
[7] Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50, 164-168.
[8] Buss, D. M. (2006). Strategies of human mating. Psychological Topics, 15, 239-260.
[9] Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
[10] Buss, D. M., & Shakelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134-146.
[11] Campos, L. S. (2005). Relacionamentos amorosos de curta e longa duracao: Uma analise a partir de anúncios classificados (Doctoral dissertation).
[12] Carneiro, T. F. (1997). Escolha amorosa e interacao conjugal relacao na heterossexualidade e na homossexualidade. Psicologia: Reflexao e Crítica, 10, 351-368.
[13] Castro, F. N. (2009). Preferencias e escolhas romanticas entre universitarios (Marters’s thesis).
[14] Correa, H. V. V. (2011). Criterios utilizados na selecao de parceiras amorosas em relacionamentos de curto e longo prazo entre mulheres de orientacao homossexual em idade reprodutiva (Marters’s thesis).
[15] Covolan, N. T. (2005). Corpo vivido e genero: A menopausa no homoerotismo feminino (Doctoral dissertation).
[16] Cruz, M. M. S. (2009). Relacoes de fertilidade feminina com a escolha de parceiros. Masther’s Thesis, Para: Universidade Federal do Para.
[17] DeWaal, C. N., & Maner, J. K. (2008). High status men (but not women) capture the eye of the beholder. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 328-341.
[18] Fiore, T. A., Taylor, L. S., Zhong, X., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2010). Who’s right and who writes: People, profiles, contacts, and replies in online dating (pp. 1-10). IEEE Xexplore-Digital Library.
[19] Fisher, H. (1995). Anatomia do amor: A história natural da monogamia, do adulterio e do divórcio. Rio de Janeiro: Eureka.
[20] Furnham, A. (2009). Sex differences in mate selection preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 262-267.
[21] Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 75-95.
[22] Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mate: Trades-off and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573-644.
[23] Garcia, A. P. (2005). Relatos de homo e heterossexuais femininos acerca do comportamento de cuidar de parentes. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Para: Universidade Federal do Para.
[24] Greengross, G., & Miller, G. F. (2008). Dissing oneself versus dissing rivals: Effects of status, personality, and sex on short-term and longterm attractiveness of self-deprecating and other-deprecating humor. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 393-408.
[25] Ha, T., van den Berg, J. E. M., Engels, R. C. M., & Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A. (2012). Effects of attractiveness and status in dating desire in homosexual and heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 673-682.
[26] Hall, L. S., & Love, C. T. (2003). Finger-length ratios in female monozygotic twins discordant for sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 23-28.
[27] Hattori, W. T. (2009). Projeto EPA: Escolha de parceiros na adolescencia (Doctoral dissertation).
[28] Kangassalo, K., Polkki, M., & Rantala, M. J. (2011). Prenatal Influences on sexual orientation: Digit ratio (2D:4D) and number of older siblings. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 496-508.
[29] Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Bryan, A., Barr, A., & Brown, S. (1995). Age preferences and mate choice among homosexuals and heterosexuals: A case for modular psychological mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1166-1172.
[30] Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heteorsexual and homosexual men and women. An examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 193-208.
[31] Lucas, M., Koff, E., Grossmith, S., & Migliorini, R. (2011). Sexual orientation and shifts in preferences for a partner’s body attributes in short-term versus long-term mating contexts. Psychological Reports, 108, 699-710.
[32] Oliva, A. D., Otta, E., Bussab, V. S. R., Lopes, F. A., Yamamoto, M. E., & Moura, M. L. S. (2006). Razao, emocao e acao em cena: A mente humana sob um olhar evolucionista. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 22, 53-65.
[33] Pawlowski, B. (2000). The biological meaning of preferences on the human mate market. Przeglad antropologiczny. Anthropological Review, 63, 39-72.
[34] Rice, W. R., Friberg, U., & Gavrilets, S. (2012). Homosexuality as a consequence of epigenetically canalized sexual development. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87, 343-368.
[35] Russock, H. I. (2011). An evolutionary interpretation of the effect of gender and sexual orientation on human mate selection preferences, as indicated by an analysis of personal advertisements. Behaviour, 148, 307-323.
[36] Sadala, K. Y. (2005). Estudo dos criterios de eleicao de parceria amorosa em mulheres de 40 a 60 anos de idade. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Para: Universidade Federal do Para.
[37] Schmitt, D. P. (2006). Fundamentals of human mating strategies. In D. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 258-291). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[38] Smith, C., Konik, J. A., & Tuve, M. V. (2011). In search of looks, status, or something else? Partner preferences among butch and femme lesbians and heterosexual men and women. Sex Roles, 64, 658-668.
[39] Stewart, S., Stinnett, H., & Rosenfelt, L. B. (2000). Sex differences in desired characteristics of short-term and long-term relationship partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 843-853.
[40] Stone, E. A., Shakelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2008). Socioeconomic development and shifts in mate preferences. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 447-455.
[41] Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2007). Social structural origins of sex differences in human mating. In S. W. Gangestad, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), The evolution of mind: Fundamental questions and controversies (pp. 383-390). New York, London: The Guilford Press.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.