Share This Article:

Institutionality: “Institution” and “Institutions Matter”

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:123KB) PP. 23-30
DOI: 10.4236/ojps.2014.41004    3,706 Downloads   6,304 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

Theories of institutions have become very popular in the social sciences. Thus, we often encounter the claim “Institutions Matter” in the new literature, which is called “institutionalism”. It is time to make a critique of this theme, asking what an institution is and what it “matters” for. “Institution” stands for two very different sorts of entities in social reality—rules and organisations—and the new institutionalism comes in two corresponding versions, economic or atomistic neo-institutionalism against sociological or holistic neoinstitutionalism. The notion of new logic of individual behaviour—a logic of appropriateness—is flawed, as it is not in agreement with basic notions in the philosophy of action.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Lane, J. (2014) Institutionality: “Institution” and “Institutions Matter”. Open Journal of Political Science, 4, 23-30. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2014.41004.

References

[1] Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 721-761.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/002205105774431243
[2] Bardhan, P. (1989). The economic theory of agrarian institutions. Oxford: Clarendon.
[3] Barzel, Y. (1989). Economic analysis of property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
[4] Bromley, D. W. (1989). Economic interests and institutions. Oxford: Blackwell.
[5] Campbell, D. E. (2006). Incentives: Motivation and the economics of information. Cambridge: Cambridge: U.P.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617430
[6] Davidson, D. (2006). The essential davidson. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
[7] De Klerk, F. W. (1999). The last trek: A new beginning. New York: St Martin’s Press.
[8] De Soto, H. (2003). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism Triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.
[9] Demsetz, H. (1967). Towards a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57, 347-359.
[10] Elliott, J. H. (2002). Imperial Spain 1469-1716. London: Penguin.
[11] Graziano, P., & Vink M. P. (2010). Europeanisation: New research agendas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
[12] Hix, S. (2008). What is wrong with the European Union, and how to fix it? Cambridge: Polity Press.
[13] Kuran, T. (2010). The long divergence. How Islamic law held back the Middle East. Princeton: Princeton U.P.
[14] Libecap, G. D. (2004). Contracting for property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
[15] Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies. New Haven: Yale U.P.
[16] Linz, J. (1994). Presidential or parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference? In Linz & Valenzuela, A. (Eds.), The failure of presidential democracy (ch 1), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
[17] March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. New York: The Free Press.
[18] March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (2005). Elaborating the “new institutionalism”. Arena Working Paper, 11.
[19] March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1996). Democratic governance. New York: The Free Press.
[20] March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 689-708). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[21] Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management. New York: Prentice-Hall.
[22] North, D. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: Norton.
[23] North, D. C. (1990). Institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
[24] North, D. C. (2010). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[25] Olsen, J. P. (2002). The many faces of europeanisation. Arena Working Paper. No. 01/2.
[26] Olsen, J. P. (2013). The institutional basis of democratic accountability. West European Politics, 3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.753704
[27] Riker, W. (1975). Federalism, handbook of political science. In F. I. Greenstein, & N. W. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science (pp. 93-172.), Vol. 5, Governmental Institutions and Processes. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesiey.
[28] Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). Governance matters VIII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996-2008. Washington DC: World Bank Development Research Group, Macroeconomics and Growth Team.
[29] Sharpe, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe. Effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[30] Thompson, J. D. (1967, 2003). Organisations in action. New Brunswich, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
[31] Von Wrigh, G. H. (2004). Explanation and understanding. Ithaca: Conell U.P.
[32] Winch. P. (1984). The idea of a social science. London: Routledge.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.