One-Pot Synthesis of Aldol Adduct Catalyzed by Immobilized Picolylamine on Zirconia

Abstract

Direct aldol reactions have been successfully performed using aromatic aldehyde and cyclic ketone in nonpolar solvent by using immobilized picolylamine on zirconia as a catalyst, in a double walled batch reactor. The prepared catalyst was characterized by SEM, XRD and FT-IR. FT-IR peaks reveal the presence of picolylamine on the surface of zirconia. The catalyst shows excellent catalytic activity in aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in cyclohexane giving 2-hydroxyphenylmethylcyclohexanone (55.7% yield) in 4 hr at 80?C. Furthermore, the catalyst is recoverable by simple filtration and could be used several times without significant loss in activity.

Share and Cite:

M. Sadiq, R.  , M. Umar and G. Zamin, "One-Pot Synthesis of Aldol Adduct Catalyzed by Immobilized Picolylamine on Zirconia," Modern Research in Catalysis, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2014, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.4236/mrc.2014.31001.

1. Introduction

Aldol reaction catalyzed by proline and picolylamine was extensively investigated for enantioselective carboncarbon bond formation [1-4]. The enantioselectivity of carbon-carbon bond mainly depending on solubility of catalytic material in polar and non-polar solvents such as aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with p-nitrobenzaldehyde catalyzed by proline has high ee% value in DMSO while failed in water [3,4]. To deal with the solubility problem, immobilization of catalytic materials such as proline on solid support may be the most effective method [5-10]. Recently, immobilized proline on silica gel, meso-porous materials and resins for aldol reaction have been reported with modest to excellent enantioselectivity depending on support, substrate and solvent [6-9]. Here we report the immobilized picolylamine on zirconia for aldol reaction of cyclohexanone and benzaldehyde at mild reaction conditions by using different solvent systems.

2. Experimental

2.1. Chemicals

The reagents used in this study were of high grade and were used without further purification.

2.2. Zirconia Preparation

ZrO2was prepared from octa-hydrated zirconyl chloride (ZrOCl∙8H2O) by ammonolysis to make the solution basic (pH 9 - 10), which turned the solution to dense precipitate. To remove the traces of chloride ions the precipitate was washed for 24 hr with triple distilled water using a modified Soxhlet’s apparatus until the chloride ion test with AgNO3 was negative. The precipitate Zr(OH)4 was dried in oven at 110˚C. The dried zirconia was ground and calcined at 930˚C in Nabertherm C-19 at a rate of 0.5˚C/min. Finally dry monoclinic zirconia was achieved and kept in sealed bottle.

2.3. Synthesis of Picolylamine

1.2 g NaH in 40 mL anhydrous toluene at 25˚C was taken in 250 mL two neck round bottom flask, 0.32 g 18-C- 6 and 1.35 mL acetyl pyridine was added and stirred for 20 min. 3.6 mL benzyl bromide was added drop wise and stirred at 50˚C for 6 hours under inert atmosphere to get the desired ketone, 2-Benzyl-3-phenyl-1-(pyridine-2yl) propan-1-one. A mixture of 3.33 g hydroxyl ammonium chloride and 6.69 mL Et3N in 53 mL ethanol was stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes. 4.82 g 2-Benzyl-3- phenyl-1-(pyridine-2yl) propan-1-one was added and reflux for 8hr, the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation and the residue was extracted with EtOAc (50 mL × 3). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated to give the crude oxime as brown oil. Without further purification, the crude 5.06 g oxime was added to 70 mL ethanol with 1.64 g NH4OAc and NaOH (59 mL, 25% v/v in H2O). This solution was heated at reflux and zinc powder (5.0 equiv, 5.05 g, 80.0 mmol) was added portion wise over 2 hours every 15 min. After refluxing for an additional 8 hours, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and concentrated NaOH was added until reaching a pH ≈ 12. After filtration through celite and washing with diethyl ether, the layers were combined, washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. After column chromatography, EtOAc/pet ether (1:4), picolylamine was obtained as pure viscous oil.

2-benzyl-3-phenyl-1-(pyridine-2yl)propan-1-amine

2.4. Immobilized Picolylamine on ZrO2

0.1 g of picolylamine was dissolved in 50 mL of toluene. 4.9 g of zirconia was added to it. The mixture was sonicated for 30 min that uniform adsorption takes place on the surface of zirconia. Then the solvent was completely evaporated. The dried catalyst was obtained and kept in a sealed bottle.

2.5. Characterization of the Catalyst

Modern techniques such as XRD, SEM and FTIR were used for characterization of the catalyst. SEM micrographs were recorded on 30 KV Scanning Electron Microscope (JSM 5910, JEOL, Japan), diffractograms were recorded on X-ray differactrometerRigaku D/Max-II, Cu tube, Japan with a tube voltage of 40 KV and 20 mA and Diffuse reflectance spectra of solids (Zirconia, immobilized picolylamine on zirconia) were recorded on Shimadzu, IRPrestigue-21, FTIR-8400S, using diffuse reflectance accessory [DRS-8000A]. Solid samples were diluted with KBr before measurement. The spectra were recorded with resolution of 4 cm−1 with 50 accumulations.

2.6. Test of Prepared Catalyst

10 mL cyclohexanone, 13 mL benzaldehyde, solvent (water, methanol/water, cyclohexane), catalyst 0.1 g were loaded to double walled batch reactor equipped with quick fit thermometer and a condenser. The reaction mixture was stirred with magnetic stirrer while temperature of reaction mixture was maintained at 80˚C for desired reaction durations. The reaction mixture was filtered and dissolved in n-hexane and monitored by (TLC) using silica gel 60 F254 and visualized by UV at 254 nm, FTIR, GC and finally scanned for determination of λmax using UV spectrophotometer (UV 1800). The peaks of FTIR and UV confirmed the desired product formation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Catalyst Characterization

The SEM images of zirconia and immobilized picolylamine on zirconia show similar smooth morphology as shown in Figure 1. Zirconia and immobilized picolylamine on zirconia have the same particle size (50 - 140 µm) calculated by intercept method from SEM images. Figure 2 show XRD pattern of both catalysts which reveal the same intense peaks at 2θ = 28˚ and 2θ= 31.4˚ which is responsible for monoclinic phase while particle size was calculated by Scherrer’s equation from XRD

where d is the average particle size of the phase under investigation, B is Scherrer’s constant (0.89), λ is the wavelength used (1.5405 Å), b is the width at mean height of the diffraction peak. The particle size calculated (124 µm) from XRD was comparable with particle size calculated from SEM images. SEM and XRD results show that immobilization of picolylamine on zirconia did not alter any change in the structural morphology of zirconia. The XRD of used zirconia show two types of trends as shown in Figure 3. The immobilized picolylamine on zirconia used for the aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in solvent (cyclohexane) show no apparent change in morphology (SEM) and crystal structure (XRD). While immobilized picolylamine on zirconia used for the same reaction in solvent methanol/ water and/or water show huge changes in SEM and XRD. The SEM images show that the smooth morphology of zirconia was destroyed while XRD pattern shows that the crystal phase of zirconia also changed. FT-IR spectra of zirconia and immobilized picolylamine on zirconia were given in Figure 4. FT-IR spectral peaks at 3430 nm and 2980 nm show that picolylamine was immobilized on the surface of zirconia.

3.2. Catalytic Test

Immobilized picolylamine on zirconia was tested in aldol reaction of cyclohexanone (10 mL) with benzaldehyde (13 mL) in cyclohexane (10 mL) at 80˚C and obtained good yield of 2-hydroxy methyl phenyl cyclohexanone in 4 hr as shown in Scheme 1. The reaction was periodically monitored by TLC (60 F254) and visualized under UV light. The product was analyzed by UV spectrophotometer and FT-IR. UV spectrum at 384 nm and FT-IR spectral peaks at 1690 nm and 3400 nm confirm the products 2-hydroxy methyl phenyl cyclohexanone as shown in Figure 5.

Scheme 1. Aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde catalyzed by immobilized picolylamine on zirconia to yield 2-hydroxy methyl phenyl cyclohexanone.

Figure 1. (a) Fresh zirconia calcined at 950˚C, (b) Immobilized picolylamine on zirconia, (c) Immobilized picolylamine on zirconia used in aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in nonpolar solvent at 80˚C for 240 min, (d) Immobilized picolylamine on zirconia used in aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in polar solvent at 80˚C for 240 min.

Figure 2. XRD patterns of monoclinic zirconia and immobilized picolylamine on zirconia.

Figure 3. XRD patterns of immobilized picolylamine on zirconia used in aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in nonpolar solvent at 80˚C for 240 min.

Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of zirconia calcined at 950˚C and immobilized picolylamine on the surface of monoclinic zirconia.

Figure 5. FT-IR of 2-hydroxy methyl phenyl cyclohexanone on the surface of (0.1 g) immobilized picolylamine on zirconia after being used for the reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in nonpolar solvent at 80˚C.

3.3. Effect of Different Reaction Parameters

The proposed model aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde was carried out under different reaction parameters. Experimental observation unveils the effects of different reaction parameters on the rate of reaction.

3.3.1. Time Profile Study

Figure 6 shows the effect of time on % yield. The time profile studies reflect that the % conversion increases with increase in reaction duration. The reactions were performed for 60 min, 120 min, 180 min and 240 min while keeping other condition as cyclohexanone 10 mL, benzaldehyde 13 mL, cyclohexane 10 mL, catalyst 0.1 g, temperature 80˚C and stirring 900 rpm. Increase in the yield pointing the fact that the contact time of the catalyst with the reactants directly affects the rate of reaction.

3.3.2. Solvent Effect

The solvents played an important role in the reaction [4-7]. Non Polar solvents showed better results than polar solvents. In the presence of immobilized picolylamine on zirconia (0.1 g), when the reaction was performed in cyclohexane (as solvent and reactant in some case), good yield of desired product was obtained. However, other solvents such as methanol/H2O (% V/V, 50/50), were substantially less effective or no reaction at all in water. In our case the prominent reason is deformation of zirconia structure or change of crystal phase as shown in Figure 3.

3.3.3. Temperature Effect

The effect of the reaction temperature was also investigated in aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in cyclohexane for different durations using immobilized picolylamine on zirconia. At temperature (60˚C), the reaction took place smoothly with good yield. A slightly higher yield was obtained when the reaction was performed at 80˚C. It is interesting to observe that conversion was maintained when 0.1 g of zirconia-supported catalyst was added to the reactions at 80˚C but decreases when temperature further increases. Activation energy (Ea = 71.5 kJ/mol) was calculated using Arhenius equation () as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 6. Plot of Time (hours) vs. % Conversion; aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in cyclohexane catalyzed by immobilized picolylamine on zirconia at 80˚C.

Figure 7. Effect of temperature (activation energy kJ/mol) on % yield in aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in nonpolar solvent for 240 min using immobilized picolylamine on zirconia.

3.3.4. Life Span of the Catalyst

To study the recyclability of immobilized picolylamine on zirconia, a more practical method was applied to the reaction between cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in nonpolar solvent at 80˚C for 240 min. When cyclohexanone was treated with aldehyde with (0.1 g) catalyst loading at 80˚C for 240 min, the desired aldol product was obtained in 55.7% yield. After carrying out a reaction, isolating the product from the reaction mixture, washing with solvents, drying and recovering catalyst and fresh starting materials were charged into the reaction system. The reactions still proceeded well. Catalyst underwent five repetitive cycles with only minor decreases in product yields.

4. Conclusions

In the recent years, organocatalysis has been extensively investigated for high yield and enantioselectivity. But still extensive research was needed to address the problems like high enantioselectivity for a narrow range of substrates and use of large amount of catalysts. The picolylamine used in this study was already used efficiently for aldol reactions in polar and nonpolar solvents with high yield and ee% values but still the problems of homogeneous catalysis like recovery of the catalyst from reaction mixture, large amount loading of catalyst in the reaction made it impractical for industries. So here we report highly efficient organocatalyst (immobilized picolylamine on zirconia) for aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in nonpolar solvent (cyclohexane) and obtain 55.7% yield of 2-hydroxy methyl phenyl cyclohexanone at 80˚C in 4 hr. The catalyst behaves like a truly heterogeneous catalyst. It was easy to recover from reaction mixture by simple filtration and reused many times with sustainable activity. The reason why the catalyst system is feasible and affordable is that it has broad substrate applicability, low catalyst loading and extended life span. The present research will open new ways in the field of organocatalysis.

Prospective of the research: the racemic picolylamine was resolved into (R)-picolylamine with (S, S)-Dtartaric acid. Immobilized (R)-picolylamine on zirconia was used for aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with benzaldehyde in the same reaction condition. The preliminary results show high % yield with every high ee value, 93%. The research is in progress and the data will be published in near future.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support of Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (Project No: 20-1604/R&D/092198) and Pakistan Science Foundation (Project No.PSF/Res/F-UM/Chem-434).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Modern Aldol Reactions, Vols. 1 & 2 (Ed.:R. Mahrwald), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2004.
[2] B. List, R. A. Lerner and C. F. Barbas III, “Proline-Catalyzed Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reactions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 122, No. 10, 2000, pp. 2395-2396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja994280y
[3] B. List, “Proline-Catalyzed Asymmetric Reactions,” Tetrahedron, Vol. 58, No. 28, 2002, pp. 5573-5590.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00516-1
[4] E. R. Jarvo and S. J. Miller, “Amino Acids and Peptides as Asymmetric Organo Catalysts,” Tetrahedron, Vol. 58, No. 13, 2002, pp. 2481-2495.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00122-9
[5] W. Notz, F. Tanaka and C. F. Barbas III, “Enamine-Based Organocatalysis with Proline and Diamines: The Development of Direct Catalytic Asymmetric Aldol, Mannich, and Diels-Alder Reactions,” Accounts of Chemical Research, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2004, pp. 580-591.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar0300468
[6] N. Mase, Y. Nakai, N. Ohara, H. Yoda, K. Takabe, F. Tanaka and C. F. Barbas, “Organocatalytic Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reactions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 128, No. 3, 2006, pp. 734-735.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja0573312
[7] Y. Hayashi, “In Water or in the Presence of Water?” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 45, No. 48, 2006, pp. 8103-8104.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200603378
[8] F. Cozzi, “Immobilization of Organic Catalysts,” Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis, Vol. 348, No. 12-13, 2006, pp. 1367-1390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200606096
[9] M. Benaglia, A. Puglisi and F. Cozzi, “Polymer-Supported Organic Catalysts,” Chemical Reviews, Vol. 103, No. 9, 2003, pp. 3401-34029.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr010440o
[10] A. Corma and H. Garcia, “Silica-Bound Homogenous Catalysts as Recoverable and Reusable Catalysts in Organic Synthesis,” Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis, Vol. 348, No. 12-13, 2006, pp. 1391-1412.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200606192

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.