The effects of severe aortic stenosis and high pulmonary artery pressure on aortic valve replacement

Faruk Toktas, Arif Gucu, Gunduz Yumun, Cuneyt Eris, Serhat Yalcinkaya, Mehmet Demir, Tuğrul Goncu, Senol Yavuz

Cardiology Department, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Thoracic Surgery Department, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

DOI: 10.4236/wjcd.2013.37067                

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary hypertension development in pure severe aortic stenosis is a situation that affects mortality and morbidity. Material and Methods: Data from files of 31 patients with systolic pulmonary artery pressure over 50 mm Hg and with pure severe aortic stenosis, and underwent aortic valve replacement in our clinic were examined retrospectively. Results: Preoperative effort capacities of the patients were evaluated as follows according to NYHA; 4 patients class 1-2, 16 patients class 3, and 11 patients class 4. Twenty-five metal, and 6 biologic aortic valves were used. Postoperative hospital mortality was recorded as 12% with 4 patients. Patients were reevaluated on the postoperative 2nd and 12th months. Pulmonary arterial pressure of the patients was measured using echocardiography. Preoperative average pulmonary artery systolic pressure was measured as 55 ± 3 mmHg. The average pressure was measured as 41 ± 3 mmHg on the 2nd, and as 37.8 ± 4 mmHg on the 12th month. The effort capacity evaluation in the postoperative 2nd month was as follows: 11 patients class 1-2, 12 patients class 3, and 4 patients class 4. The effort capacity evaluation conducted in the 12th month was: 14 patients were class 1-2, 10 patients were class 3, and 2 patients were class 4. During the follow-up 1 year, survival rate of the patients was determined as 83.8% average, 5 year survival rate was determined as 61.5%. Conclusion: We believe that AVR may be performed in severe aortic stenosis cases with high pulmonary pressure with acceptable ortality, leading to a better quality and longer life.

Keywords

Aortic Valve Stenosis; Pulmonary Hypertension; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Prognosis

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Bonow, R.O., Carabello, B., de Leon Jr., A.C., et al. (1998) ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 32, 1486-1588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00454-9
[2]	Rahimtoola, S.H. (1989) Perspective on valvular heart disease: An update. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 14, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(89)90047-8
[3]	Chizner, M.A., Pearle, D.L. and de Leon Jr., A.C. (1980) The natural history of aortic stenosis in adults. American Heart Journal, 99, 419-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(80)90375-0
[4]	Horstkotte, D. and Loogen, F. (1988) The natural history of aortic stenosis. European Heart Journal, 9, 57-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/9.suppl_E.57
[5]	Livanainen, A.M., Lindroos, M., Tilvis, R., Heikkila, J. and Kupari, M. (1996) Natural history of aortic valve stenosis of varying severity in the elderly. American Journal of Cardiology, 78, 97-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00235-4
[6]	Bonow, R.O., Carabello, B., de Leon Jr., A.C., et al. (1998) Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: Executive summary A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease). Circulation, 98, 1949-1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.98.18.1949
[7]	Lund, O., Flo, C., Jensen, F.T., et al. (1997) Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in aortic stenosis: Prognostic value after valve replacement and underlying mechanisms. European Heart Journal, 18, 1977-1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015209
[8]	Connolly, H.M., Oh, J.K., Orszulak, T.A., et al. (1997) Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators. Circulation, 95, 2395-2400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.95.10.2395
[9]	Ross Jr., J. and Braunwald, E. (1968) Aortic stenosis. Circulation, 36, IV-61-IV-67.
[10]	Schwarz, F., Banmann, P., Manthey, J., et al. (1982) The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival. Circulation, 66, 1105-1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.66.5.1105
[11]	Shahbudin, H., Rahimtoola, M.B. and Frye, R.L. (2000) Valvular heart disease. Circulation, 102, IV-24.
[12]	Alberico, S., Pompilio, F., Gerard, P.A., Cesare, R., et al. (1998) Ventricular arrhythmias in adult aortic stenosis prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical relevance. Chest, 113, 482-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.113.2.482
[13]	Santiga, J.T., Kirsh, M.M., Brady, T.J., et al. (1982) Left ventricular function in patients with ventricular arrhythmias and aortic valve disease. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 35, 152-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)61452-X
[14]	Michel, P.L., Mandagout, O., Vhanian, A., et al. (1992) Ventricular arrhythmias in aortic valve disease before and after valve replacement. Acta Cardiologica, 2, 145-156.
[15]	McHenry, M.M., Rice, J., Matlof, H.J. and Flamm Jr., M.D. (1979) Pulmonary hypertension and sudden death in aortic stenosis. British Heart Journal, 41, 463-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.41.4.463
[16]	Connolly, H.M., Oh, J.K., Schaff, H.V., et al. (2000) Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction: Result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients. Circulation, 101, 1940-1946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.16.1940
[17]	He, G.W., Grunkemeier, G.L., Gately, H.L., Furnary, A.P. and Starr, A. (1995) Up to thirty-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 59, 1056-1062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00075-V
[18]	Johnson, L.W., Hapanowicz, M.B., Buonanno, C., et al. (1988) Pulmonary hypertension in isolated aortic stenosis Hemodynamic correlations and follow-up. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 95, 603-607.
[19]	Tracy, G.P., Proctor, M.S. and Hizny, C.S. (1990) Reversibility of pulmonary artery hypertension in aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 50, 89-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(90)90095-N
[20]	Snopek, G., Pogorzelska, H., Zielinski, T., et al. (1996) Valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe congestive heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 5, 268-272.
[21]	Malouf, J.F., Enriquez-Sarano, M., Pellikka, P.A., et al. (2002) Severe pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: Clinical profile and prognostic implications. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 40, 789-795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02002-8
[22]	Pai, R.G., Varadarajan, P., Kapoor, N. and Bansal, R.C. (2007) Aortic valve replacement improves survival in severe aortic stenosis associated with severe pulmonary hypertension. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 84, 80-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.094
[23]	Varadarajan, P., Kapoor, N., Bansal, R.C. and Pai, R.G. (2006) Clinical profile and natural history of 453 nonsurgically managed patients with severe aortic stenosis. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 82, 2111-2115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.07.048