CUS> Vol.1 No.3, September 2013

Morrow Tomorrow: Exploring the Pedagogical Experience of a Planning Studio Involving Students with Mixed Skills

DownloadDownload as PDF (Size:2866KB)  HTML    PP. 59-73  

ABSTRACT

This article explores the pedagogical experience of a group of graduate planning students with diverse undergraduate backgrounds in a degree capstone studio. The studio concentrates on the shrinkingvillage of Morrow, Ohio. Following a brief overview of the shrinking cities literature, the article discusses the specific issues of economic decline facing the Village of Morrow and its population. It then delves into two specific aspects of this pedagogical experience, namely, a two-part SWOT analysis based on the data collected by the students directly and from a community charrette, and three redevelopment scenarios developed following an analysis of the lessons learned from this experience. The discussion and conclusion focus on the pros and cons of a planning studio involving students with mixed (design and non-design) skills.

KEYWORDS


Cite this paper

Arefi, M. and J. Edelman, D. (2013) Morrow Tomorrow: Exploring the Pedagogical Experience of a Planning Studio Involving Students with Mixed Skills. Current Urban Studies, 1, 59-73. doi: 10.4236/cus.2013.13007.

References

[1] Adhya, A. (2013). From crisis to projects: A regional agenda for ad- dressing foreclosures in shrinking first suburbs: Lessons from Warren, Michigan. Urban Design International, 18, 43-60. doi:10.1057/udi.2012.31
[2] Arendt, R. (2012). Planning education: Striking a better balance. Planetizen. http://www.planetizen.com/node/59072
[3] Bluestone, B., & Harrison, B. (1982). The deindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.
[4] Bowns, C. (2013). Shrinkage happens… in small towns too! Responding to de-population and loss of place in Susquehanna River Towns. Urban Design International, 18, 61-77. doi:10.1057/udi.2012.27
[5] Coyle, S. (2011). Sustainable and resilient communities: A comprehensive action plan for towns, cities, and regions. Hoboken: The John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[6] Dunham-Jones, E., & Williamson, J. (2011). Retrofitting suburbia: Urban design solutions for redesigning suburbs. Hoboken: The John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[7] Feldhoff, T. (2013). Shrinking communities in Japan: Community ownership of assets as a development potential for rural Japan? Urban Design International, 18, 99-109.
[8] Hospers, G. (2013). Coping with shrinkage in Europe’s cities and towns. Urban Design International, 18, 78-89. doi:10.1057/udi.2012.29
[9] Kelling, G. L., & Wilson, J. Q. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic, March 1.
[10] Mayer, H., & Holzheimer, T. (2009). Virginia’s creative economy. Virginia’s Issues and Answers, 15, 2-12.
[11] Myers, D., & Banerjee, T. (2005). Toward greater heights for planning: Reconciling the differences between profession, practice, and academic field. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71, 121-129. doi:10.1080/01944360508976687
[12] Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
[13] Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London. Tokyo, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[14] Sorkin, M. (2012). How green is my city: The state of sustainable urbanism. Landscape Architecture Magazine, 179-182.
[15] Warren County Historical Society (1979). Village of morrow comprehensive plan. www.googlemaps.com
[16] Zingale, N., & Riemann, D. (2013). Coping with shrinkage in Germany and the United States: A cross-cultural comparative approach toward sustainable cities. Urban Design International, 18, 90-98. doi:10.1057/udi.2012.30

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.