Influential aspects on seismic performance of confined masonry construction

Ajay Chourasia, Sriman K. Bhattacharyya, Pradeep K. Bhargava, Navratan M. Bhandari

CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, India.
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India.

DOI: 10.4236/ns.2013.58A1007                

Abstract

Recent earthquakes around the world have resulted in loss of human lives and high economic losses due to poor performance of unreinforced masonry constructions as well as poorly-built reinforced concrete framed buildings. This has necessitated alternative building technologies with improved seismic performance. Confined masonry (CM) construction, has shown excellent behavior during past earthquakes across the world and requires similar skill at a marginally higher cost than that of unreinforced masonry. This paper summarizes the main features of generic construction and gains insight into the behavior of CM elements under earthquake excitations, representing a viable alternative for safe and economical construction in seismic areas. The paper discusses various influential aspects like sequence of construction, properties and type of masonry material, structural configuration, reinforcement detailing in tie column/beam and masonry, panel aspect ratio, interface between concrete and masonry, axial stress, multiple confining column, opening in wall panels and damage pattern etc. along with solution to overcome the limitations.

Keywords

Confined Masonry; Reinforcement Detailing; Panel Aspect Ratio; Masonry Interface; Multiple Confining Column; Damage Pattern

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Alcocer, S.M. and Zepeda, J.A. (1999) Behavior of multi-perforated clay brick walls under earthquake type loading. 8th North American Masonry Conference, Austin, 6-9 June 1999, 235-246.
[2]	Alcocer, S.M., Arias, J.G. and Vazquez, A. (2004) Response assessment of Mexican confined masonry structures through shaking table tests. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, 1-6 August 2004, 13 Pages.
[3]	Aguilar, G., Meli, R., Diaz, R. and Vazquez-del-Mercado, R. (1996) Influence of horizontal reinforcement on the behaviour of confined masonry walls. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, 23-28 June 1996, No. 1380.
[4]	Brzev, S. (2007) Earthquake resistant confined masonry construction. National Information Centre of Earthquake Engineering, Kanpur.
[5]	Gostic, S. and Zarnic, R. (1999) Cyclic lateral response of masonry infilled RC frames and confined masonry walls. Proceedings of the 8th North American Masonry Conference, Austin, 3-6 June 1999, 477-488.
[6]	Gouveia, J.P. and Lourenco, P.B. (2007) Masonry shear walls subjected to cyclic loading: Influence of confinement and horizontal reinforcement. 10th North American Masonry Conference, Missouri, 3-6 June 2007, 838-848.
[7]	Irimies, M.T. (2002) Confined Masonry Walls: the influence of the tie-column vertical reinforcement ratio on the seismic behaviour. The Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, 9-13 September 2002, 241 Pages.
[8]	Meli, R. (2003) Behavior of masonry walls under lateral loads. Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, 25-29 June 1973, Paper 101a.
[9]	Bernardini, A., Modena, C., Turnesek, V. and Vescovi, U. (1980) A comparison of three laboratory tests.
[10]	Luders, C. and Hidalgo, P. (1986) Influencia dei refuerzo horizontal en el comportamiento seismico de muros de albanileria armada. Cuartas Jornadas Chilenas de Sismologia e Ingenieria Antisismica, 2, H139-H158.?
[11]	Tomazevic, M. and Lutman, M. (1988) Seismic resistance of reinforced masonry walls. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Japan As, for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, Tokyo, 2-9 August 1988, VI/97-102.
[12]	Sanchez, T.A., Flores, L.E., Leon F., Alcocer S.M. and Meli, R. (1992) Respuesta sismica de muros de mamposteria confinada con diferentes grados de acoplamiento a flexion. CENAPRED, Informe ES/02/91, 106 Pages.
[13]	Kumazava, F. and Ohkubo, M. (2000) Nonlinear characteristics of confined masonry wall with lateral reinforcement in mortar joints. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, Paper No. 743.
[14]	Yoshimura, K., Kikuchi, K., Kuroki, M., Nonaka, H., Kim, K.T., Matsumoto, Y., et al. (2003) Experimental study on reinforcing methods for confined masonry walls subjected to seismic forces. 9th North American Masonry Conference, Clemson, 1-4 June 2003, 89-100.
[15]	Yoshimura, K., Kikuchi, K., Kuroki, M., Liu, L. and Ma, L. (2000) Effect of wall reinforcement, applied lateral forces and vertical axial loads on seismic behavior of confined concrete masonry walls. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 0984.
[16]	Yanez, F., Astroza, M., Holmberg, A. and Ogaz, O. (2004) Behavior of confined masonry shear walls with large openings. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, 1-6 August 2004, Paper No. 3438.
[17]	Zabala. C., Honma, C., Gibu, P., Gallardo, P. and Huaco, G. (2004) Full scale on line test on two story masonry building using handmade bricks. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, 1-6 August 2004, 14 Pages.
[18]	Marinilli, A. and Castilla, E. (2004) Experimental evaluation of confined masonry walls with several confining-columns. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, 1-6 August 2004, 12 Pages.
[19]	Wijaya, W., Kusumastuti, D., Suarjana, M., Rildova and Pribadi, K. (2011) Experimental study on wall-frame connection of confined masonry wall. Procedia Engineering, 14, 2094-2102. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.263
[20]	Alcocer, S.M., Arias, J.G. and Vazquez, A. (2003) The New Mexico City building code requirements for design and construction of masonry structures. The Proceedings of the 9th North American Masonry Conference, Clemson, 1-4 June 2003, 656-667.
[21]	Moroni, M., Astroza M. and Caballero, R. (2000) Wall density and seismic performance of confined masonry buildings. TMS Journal, 18, 81-88.
[22]	Tomazevic, M. and Klemenc, I. (1997) Seismic behaviour of confined masonry walls. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26, 1059-1071. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199710)26:10<1059::AID-EQE694>3.0.CO;2-M
[23]	European committee for standardization (2002) European standard.
[24]	Arya, A.S. (2000) Non-engineered construction in developing countries—An approach toward earthquake risk reduction. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 33, 187-208.
[25]	Alvarez, J.J. (1996) Some topics on the seismic behaviour of confined masonry structures. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Paper No. 180.
[26]	Meli R., Svetlana Brzev, et al. (2011) Seismic design guide for low rise confined masonry buildings. EERI & IAEE, Tokyo.
[27]	Moroni, M., Astroza M. and Mesias, P. (1996) Displacement capacity and required story drift in confined masonry buildings. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Paper No. 1059.
[28]	Ishibashi, K., Meli, R., Alcocer, S.M., Leon, F. and Sanchez, T.A. (1992) Experimental study on earthquake-resistant design of confined masonry structures. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, 19-24 July 1992, 3469-3474.
[29]	Bariola, J. and Delgado, C. (1996) Design of confined masonry walls under lateral loading. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Paper No. 204.
[30]	Gibu, P. and Zavala C. (2002) The current state-of-the-art of masonry and adobe building in Peru. Japan Peru Center for Earthquake Engineering Research and Disaster Mitigation, Lima.
[31]	Flores, L.E. and Alcocer, S.M. (1996) Calculated response of confined masonry structures. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Paper No. 1830.
[32]	Tomazevic, M. and Klemenc, I. (1997) Verification of seismic resistance of confined masonry buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26, 10731088. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199710)26:10<1073::AID-EQE695>3.0.CO;2-Z
[33]	Alcocer, S.M. (1996) Implications derived from recent research in Mexico on confined masonry structures. Worldwide Advances in Structural Concrete and Masonry: Proceedings of the CCMS Symposium Held in Conjunction with Structures Congress XIV, Chicago, 15-18 April 1996, 82-92.