Equivalent Substitution Based Method for Calculation of Best Installed Capacity of Pumped Storage Power Station

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel method to calculate the best installed capacity of pumped storage power station. First, we choose the day with maximum load as the typical day for every month and simulate the system running in two cases of whether the pumped storage power station is put into operation. The difference of the total coal consumption between the two cases is the peak load shifting benefit. Furthermore, we build load model and power generation model to calculate the benefit of emergency use and frequency modulation, which are the major projects of dynamic benefits. At last, on the premise of ensuring the system requirements, the developed method employs the maximum benefit of the unit capacity as the objective function to get the best installed capacity of pumped storage power station by simulations. Tests on a provincial power grid have shown that the developed method which combines of load characteristics, electric structure and other factors can get the best installed capacity of pumped storage power station easily and has a certain guiding significance for the planning and construction of the pumped storage power station.

Share and Cite:

J. Li, T. Yu and H. Wang, "Equivalent Substitution Based Method for Calculation of Best Installed Capacity of Pumped Storage Power Station," Energy and Power Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 3B, 2013, pp. 46-51. doi: 10.4236/epe.2013.53B010.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] H. L. Zhang, D. M. Xie, J. Y. Liu, et al., “Optimized Control of the Startup and Shutdown of Peaking Units,” Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2005, pp. 300-303.
[2] X. M. Yu, X. G. Xiong, Y. W. Wu, et al., “Discussion on Optimal Mode for Peaking Units Expansion Planning and Its Application,” Electric Power, Vol. 36, No.1, 2003, pp. 48-51.
[3] J. Barton and D. Infield, “Energy Storage and Its Use with Intermittent Renewable Energy,” IEEE Transaction. Energy Conversion, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 441-448. doi:10.1109/TEC.2003.822305
[4] W. Leonhard and E. Grobe, “Sustainable Electrical Energy Supply with Wind and Pumped Storage: A Realistic long-term Strategy or Utopia,” Proceedings IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004, pp. 1221-1225.
[5] Anonymous, “Pumped-storage Project Updates,” International Journal of Hydropower Dams, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2002, pp. 104-109.
[6] R. M. Burns and C. A. Gibson, “Optimization of Priority Lists for a Unit Commitment Program,” in Proceeding IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 1975.
[7] Narayana Prasad Padhy, “Unit Commitment—A Bibliographical Survey,” IEEE Transaction Power System, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 1196-1205. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2003.821611
[8] H. K. Song, Y. D. Tang, G. Q. Tang, et al., “Analysis of Power Generation Enterprise Bidding Strategies Considering Demand Side Bidding,” Electric Power Automation Equipment, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2007, pp. 47-50.
[9] K. Aoki, M. Itoh, K. Nara. and M. Kanezashi, “Optimal Long-term Unit Commitment In Large Scale Systems Including Fuel Constrained Thermal And Pumped Storage Hydro,” IEEE Transaction Power System, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1989, pp.1065-1073. doi:10.1109/59.32600
[10] K. Aoki, M. Itoh, T. Satoh, et al., “Optimal Long-term Unit Commitment in Large Scale Systems Including Fuel Constrained Thermal and Pumped-storage Hydro,” IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1989, pp. 1065-1073. doi:10.1109/59.32600

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.