Mathematical Platonism and the Nature of Infinity
Gilbert B. Côté
Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.33056   PDF    HTML     8,886 Downloads   11,929 Views   Citations

Abstract

An analysis of the counter-intuitive properties of infinity as understood differently in mathematics, classical physics and quantum physics allows the consideration of various paradoxes under a new light (e.g. Zeno’s dichotomy, Torricelli’s trumpet, and the weirdness of quantum physics). It provides strong support for the reality of abstractness and mathematical Platonism, and a plausible reason why there is something rather than nothing in the concrete universe. The conclusions are far reaching for science and philosophy.

Share and Cite:

Côté, G. (2013). Mathematical Platonism and the Nature of Infinity. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 372-375. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.33056.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Clegg, B. (2003). A brief history of infinity. The quest to think the unthinkable. London: Robinson.
[2] Cole, J. C. (2010). Mathematical platonism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/mathplat/
[3] Coté, G. B. (2012). Latest quantum experiments point to the reality of abstractness and timelessness. http://comments.sciencemag.org/content/10.1126/science.1226755
[4] Dunham, W. (1990). Journey through genius. The great theorems of mathematics. New York: Penguin Books, John Wiley & Sons.
[5] Dunham, W. (1994). The mathematical universe. An alphabetical journey through the great proofs, problems, and personalities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[6] Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L. (2010). The grand design. New York: Bantam Books, Random House.
[7] Holt, J. (2012). Why does the world exist? An existential detective story. New York: Liveright Publishing, W. W. Norton.
[8] Krauss, L. M. (2012). A universe from nothing. Why there is something rather than nothing. New York: Free Press.
[9] Maxwell, N. (2011). Three philosophical problems about consciousness and their possible resolution. Open Journal of Philosophy, 1, 1-10. doi:10.4236/ojpp.2011.11001
[10] Set, J., & Rêve, J. (2012). Our theory of everything. Raleigh, NC: Lulu.
[11] Weisstein, E. W. (2013). Gabriel’s horn. Math World—A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GabrielsHorn.html
[12] Wikipedia, Gabriel’s horn. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabriel’s_Horn

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.