Algorhythm for Use of Percutaneous Short Fixation of Fractures Involving the Thoracolumbar Junction and Lumbar Spine

Nicola Marotta, Alessandro Landi, Roberto Delfini

Neurosurgery Department of University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy..

DOI: 10.4236/ijcm.2013.47A1003                

Abstract

Study Design: Original article. Objective: Guidelines for deciding whether to perform open or percutaneous surgery in burst fractures. Summary of Background Data: The authors propose an algorithm for deciding whether to perform open surgery or percutaneous surgery with short fixation in patients with fractures of the thoracolumbar junction and lumbar spine. Methods: Between July 2005 and July 2009, 72 patients underwent surgical stabilization by posterior route for fractures of the thoracolumbar junction and lumbar spine. In 44 the lesion involved the thoracolumbar junction, in 28 the lumbar spine (L2 in6 cases, L3 in15 cases, L5 in7 cases). The fractures were assessed morphologically according to Magerl’s classification (52 type A, 12 type B, 8 type C). All patients were analyzed according to the algorithm proposed, according to which patients must fulfil certain criteria: the fracture must be Magerl type A.3, it must involve one level, McCormack score must be 6 or less, invasion of the spinal canal must be 25% or less according to Hashimoto’s formula, Magnetic Resonance Imating (MRI) must confirm discoligamentous integrity. Neurologically, the patient must be ASIA E. 25 patients (17 thoracolumbar junction, 8 lumbar spine) fulfilled these criteria and were treated by percutaneous short fixation. Results: The average length of the surgical procedure was 80 minutes and the loss of blood 10 cc. All patients were dismissed without brace and were submitted to follow-upComputed Tomography CTscan 3 and 6 months after surgery. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 4 years. In all cases CT scan confirmed fusion and there were no cases of rupture of the device. None of the patients presented neurological deficits. Conclusion: The algorithm described permits a proper selection of patients with thoracolumbar fractures who can be treated by percutaneous short fixation, thus avoiding the risks connected with failure of the stabilization system.

Keywords

Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery; Percutaneous Short Fixation; Thoraco-Lumbar Fractures

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	F. Magerl, “A Comprehensive Classification of Thoracic and Lumbar Injuries,” European Spine Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1994, pp. 184-201. doi:10.1007/BF02221591
[2]	T. McCormack et al., “The Load Sharing Classification of Spine Fractures,” Spine, Vol. 19, No. 15, 1994, pp. 1741-1744. doi:10.1097/00007632-199408000-00014
[3]	T. Hashimoto, “Relationship between Traumatic Spinal Canal Stenosis and Neurologic Deficits in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures,” Spine, Vol. 13, No. 11, 1988, pp. 12681272. doi:10.1097/00007632-198811000-00011
[4]	W. Caspar, “A New Surgical Procedure for Lumbar Disc Herniation Causing Less Tissue Damage through a Microsurgical Approach,” Advanced Neurosurgery, Vol. 4, 1977, pp. 74-80. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-66578-3_15
[5]	S. Hijigata, et al., “Percutaneous Diskectomy: A New Treatment Method for Lumbar Disc Herniation,” Journal of Toden Hospital Vol. 5, 1975, pp. 5-13.
[6]	L. T. Khoo, “Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Posterior Lumbar Intebody Fusion,” Neurosurgery, Vol. 51, No. 5S, 2002, pp. S166-S181.
[7]	A. Muller, “A Keyhole Approach for Endoscopically Assisted Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Spine Instability,” Neurosurgery, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2000, pp. 85-96. doi:10.1227/00006123-200007000-00019
[8]	K. Muramatsu, “Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Comparison of Microendoscopic Discectomy and Love’s Method,” Spine, Vol. 26, No. 14, 2001, pp. 1599-1605. doi:10.1097/00007632-200107150-00022
[9]	M. Altay, “Treatment of Unstable Thoraco-Lumbar Junction Burst Fractures with Short-or Long-Segment Posterior Fixation in Magerl Type A Fractures,” European Spine Journal, Vol. 16, No. 8, 2007, pp. 1145-1155. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0310-5
[10]	P. L. Sanderson, “Short Segment Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures without Fusion,” European Spine Journal, Vol. 8, No. 6, 1999, pp. 495-500. doi:10.1007/s005860050212
[11]	X. Y. Wong, “Kyphosis Recurrence after Posterior ShortSegment Fixation in Thoraco-Lumbar Burst Fractures,” Journal of Neurology, Spine, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2008, pp. 246-254.
[12]	M. Aebi, et al., “AO ASIF Priciples in Spine Surgery,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998, pp. 1-143. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58824-2_1
[13]	F. Denis, et al., “The Three Column Spine and Its Significance in the Classification of an Acute Thoracolumbar Spinal Injuries,” Spine, Vol. 8, No. 8, 1983, pp. 817-831. doi:10.1097/00007632-198311000-00003
[14]	R. Meves, “Correlation between Neurogical Deficit and Spinal Canal Compromise in 198 Patients with Thoracoloumbar and Lumbar Fractures,” Spine, Vol. 30, No. 7, 2005, pp. 787-791. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000157482.80271.12
[15]	S. P. Mohanty, “Does Neurological Recovery in ThoracoLumbar and Lumbar Burst Fractures Depend on the Extent of Canal Compromise,” Spinal Cord, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2002, pp. 295-299. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101283
[16]	A. R. Vaccaro, et al., “A New Classification of Thoracolumbar Injuries: The Importance of Injury Morphology, the Integrity of the Posterior Ligamentous Complex, and Neurologic Status,” Spine, Vol. 30, No. 20, 2005, pp. 2325-2333. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000182986.43345.cb
[17]	R. A. Vaccaro, et al., “Surgical Decision Making for Unstable Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2006, pp. 1-10. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000180080.59559.45
[18]	R. Yurec, B. Marre, A. Urzua, M. Munjin and M. A. Lecaros, “Residual Mobility of Instrumented and Non-Fused Segments in Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures,” European Spine Journal, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2006, pp. 864-875. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0939-x