Share This Article:

Avoiding Unnecessary Pulmonary CT Angiography by Using a Combination of Clinical Criteria and D-Dimer Thresholds

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:135KB) PP. 78-84
DOI: 10.4236/ojrad.2013.32012    3,304 Downloads   5,025 Views   Citations


Objective: To evaluate what specific combination of clinical criteria and d-dimer values may yield at least a 10% positive pulmonary embolism (PE) rate in patients undergoing pulmonary CT angiography (CTA). Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of all patients presenting to the Emergency Department with possible PE who underwent pulmonary CTA and had a d-dimer drawn. Wells scores were retrospectively assigned based on data gathered through medical records. Results: During a 29-month period, 1110 patients underwent pulmonary CTA. Of these, 773 also had a d-dimer drawn. These subjects were stratified based on serum d-dimer levels into negative (≤4 μg/ml), nonpositive (0.41 - 1.0 μg/ml), or positive (>1.0 μg/ml) d-dimer categories. The prevalence of positive CTA studies was >10% only in the positive d-dimer group. Subjects were also stratified based on their Wells score into three clinical categories: low (score < 2), intermediate (score = 2 - 6), and high risk of pulmonary embolism (score > 6). The prevalence of positive CTA was > 10% only in the group of subjects with high clinical risk. When stratified according to both Wells criteria and d-dimer, only those patients with intermediate or high clinical risk combined with a positive d-dimer (>1.0 μg/ml) had a prevalence of positive pulmonary CTA > 10%. By limiting the use of CTA studies to those patients with positive d-dimer values or high clinical risk, 438 (55.4%) patients could have avoided CTA imaging. Conclusion: Utilizing CTA only in patients suspected of PE with a combination of high clinical risk based on a Wells criteria threshold score > 6 and a serum d-dimer cutoff of 1 μg/ml would increase the prevalence of positive pulmonary CTA studies above 10% and avoid a large number of CTA imaging studies.

Cite this paper

L. Gimber, J. Leong, L. Todoki and H. Yoon, "Avoiding Unnecessary Pulmonary CT Angiography by Using a Combination of Clinical Criteria and D-Dimer Thresholds," Open Journal of Radiology, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2013, pp. 78-84. doi: 10.4236/ojrad.2013.32012.


[1] M. M. Costantino, G. Randall, M. Gosselin, M. Brandt, K. Spinning and C. D. Vegas, “CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism,” American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 191, No. 2, 2008, pp. 471-474. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2552
[2] J. D. Prologo, R. C. Gilkeson, M. Diaz and J. Asaad, “CT Pulmonary Angiography: A Comparative Analysis of the Utilization Patterns in Emergency Department and Hospitalized Patients between 1998 and 2003,” American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 183, No. 4, 2004, pp. 1093-1096. doi:10.2214/ajr.183.4.1831093
[3] K. K. Calder, M. Herbert and S. O. Henderson, “The Mortality of Untreated Pulmonary Embolus in Emergency Department Patients,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2005, pp. 302-310. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.10.001
[4] D. J. Brenner and E. J. Hall, “Computed Tomography— An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 357, No. 22, 2007, pp. 2277-2284. doi:10.1056/NEJMra072149
[5] A. Sodickson, P. F. Baeyens, K. P. Andriole, L. M. Prevedello, R. D. Nawfel, R. Hanson and R. Khorasani, “Recurrent CT, Cumulative Radiation Exposure, and Associated Radiation-Induced Cancer Risks from CT of Adults,” Radiology, Vol. 251, No. 1, 2009, pp. 175-184. doi:10.1148/radiol.2511081296
[6] M. J. Kuhn, N. Chen, D. V. Sahani, D. Reimer, E. J. R. van Beek, J. P. Heiken and G. J. So, “The PREDICT Study: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy after Low or Isoosmolar Contrast Agent Exposure,” American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 191, No. 1, 2008, pp. 151-157. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3370
[7] M. Carrier, M. Righini, P. S. Wells, A. Perrier, D. R. Anderson, M. A. Rodger, S. Pleasance and G. Le Gal, “Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosed by Computed Tomography: Incidence and Clinical Implications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Management Outcome Studies,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Vol. 8, No. 8, 2010, pp. 1716-1722. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03938.x
[8] P. S. Wells, D. R. Anderson, M. Rodger, I. Stiell, J. F. Dreyer, D. Barnes, M. Forgie, G. Kovacs, J. Ward and M. J. Kovacs, “Excluding Pulmonary Embolism at the Bedside without Diagnostic Imaging: Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Presenting to the Emergency Department by Using a Simple Clinical Model and D-Dimer,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Vol. 135, 2001, pp. 98-107. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00010
[9] Writing Group for the Christopher Study Investigators, “Effectiveness of Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Using an Algorithm Combining Clinical Probability, D-Dimer Testing, and Computed Tomography,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 295, No. 2, 2006, pp. 172-179. doi:10.1001/jama.295.2.172
[10] G. C. Hui, A. Legasto and C. Wittram, “The Prevalence of Symptomatic and Coincidental Pulmonary Embolism on Computed Tomography,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2008, pp. 783-787. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e31815a7aea
[11] C. Farrell, M. Jones, F. Girvin, G. Ritchie, J. T. Murchison, “Unsuspected Pulmonary Embolism Identified Using Multidetector Computed Tomography in Hospital Outpatients,” Clinical Radiology, Vol. 65, No. 1, 2010, pp. 1-5.
[12] F. Dentali, W. Ageno, C. Becattini, L. Galli, M. Gianni, N. Riva, D. Imberti, A. Squizzato, A. Venco and G. Agnelli, “Prevalence and Clinical History of Incidental, Asymptomatic Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-Analysis,” Thrombosis Research, Vol. 125, No. 6, 2010, pp. 518-522. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2010.03.016
[13] P. W. Abcarian, J. D. Sweet, J. T. Watabe and H. -C. Yoon, “Role of a Quantitative D-Dimer Assay in Determining the Need for CT Angiography of Acute Pulmonary Embolism,” American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 182, No. 6, 2004, pp. 1377-1381. doi:10.2214/ajr.182.6.1821377
[14] L. K. Hirai, J. M. Takahashi and H.-C. Yoon, “A Prospective Evaluation of a Quantitative D-Dimer Assay in the Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 18, No. 8, 2007, pp. 970-974. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2007.04.020
[15] The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), “Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism,” European Heart Journal, Vol. 29, No. 18, 2008, pp. 2276-2315. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn310
[16] P. D. Stein, S. E. Fowler, L. R. Goodman, A. Gottschalk, C. A. Hales, R. D. Hull, K. V. Leeper, J. Popovich, D. A. Quinn, T. A. Sos, H. D. Sostman, V. F. Tapson, T. W. Wakefield, J. G. Weg and P. K. Woodard, “Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 354, No. 22, 2006, pp. 2317-2327. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa052367
[17] J. H. Donohoo, W. W. Mayo-Smith, J. A. Pezzullo and T. K. Egglin, “Utilization Patterns and Diagnostic Yield of 3421 Consecutive Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiograms in a Busy Emergency Department,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2008, pp. 421-425. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e31812e6af3
[18] D. M. Adams, S. M. Stevens, S. C. Woller, R. S. Evans, J. F. Lloyd, G. L. Snow, T. L. Allen, J. R. Bledsoe, L. M. Brown, D. P. Blagev, T. D. Lovelace, T. L. Shill, K. E. Conner, V. T. Aston and C. G. Elliott, “Adherence to PIOPED II Investigators’ Recommendations for Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography,” American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 126. No. 1, 2013, pp. 36-42. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.028
[19] M. V. Huppmann, W. B. Johnson and M. C. Javitt, “Radiation Risks from Exposure to Chest Computed Tomography,” Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MRI, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2010, pp. 14-28.
[20] J. Kuriakose and S. Patel, “Acute Pulmonary Embolism,” Radiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2010, pp. 31-50.
[21] F. A. Mettler, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi and M. Mahesh, “Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog,” Radiology, Vol. 248, No. 1, 2008, pp. 254-263. doi:10.1148/radiol.2481071451
[22] A. M. Mitchell, A. E. Jones, J. A. Tumlin and J. A. Kline, “Prospective Study of the Incidence of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy among Patients Evaluated for Pulmonary Embolism by Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography,” Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2012, pp. 618-625. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01374.x
[23] L. Hirai-Gimber, R. I. Travis, J. M. Takahashi, T. L. Goodman and H.-C. Yoon, “Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients Evaluated for Acute Pulmonary Embolism with Low Serum D-Dimer Levels: A Prospective Study,” The Permanente Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2009, pp. 4-10.
[24] P. Deonarine, C. de Wet and A. McGhee, “Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography and Pulmonary Embolism: Predictive Value of a D-Dimer Assay,” BMC Research Notes, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2012, p. 104. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-5-104
[25] M. F. Bullano, V. Willey, O. Hauch, G. Wygantand, A. C. Spyropoulos and L. Hoffman, “Longitudinal Evaluation of Health Plan Cost Per Venous Thromboembolism or Bleed Event in Patients with a Prior Venous Thromboembolism Event During Hospitalization,” Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy, Vol. 11, No. 8, 2005, pp. 663-673.
[26] J. A. Kline, M. M. Hogg, D. M. Courtney, C. D. Miller, A. E. Jones and H. A. Smithline, “D-Dimer Threshold Increase with Pretest Probability Unlikely for Pulmonary Embolism to Decrease Unnecessary Computerized Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2012, pp. 572-581. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04647.x
[27] C. Kabrhel, M. Courtney, C. A. CamargoJr, C. L. Moore, P. B. Richman, M. C. Plewa, K. E. Nordenholtz, H. A. Smithline, D. M. Beam, M. D. Brown and J. A. Kline, “Potential Impact of Adjusting the Threshold of the Quantitative D-Dimer Based on Pretest Probability of Acute Pulmonary Embolism,” Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2009, pp. 325-332. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00368.x

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.