The effect of a wearable visual cue on patient satisfaction survey scores in the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting

Abstract

With a portion of healthcare reimbursement now dependent on the patient’s report of the hospital experience, healthcare systems are looking for ways to improve patient satisfaction scores. In this study, one inpatient physiatrist at an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility wore a button on the right lapel of his white coat at all times which read, “Ask ME about your TREATMENT and PROGRESS!!!” in order to determine if a wearable visual cue prompting the patient to discuss his or her treatment and progress alters Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey (PGPSS) scores. Mean score on the physician-specific PGPSS question “How well the rehabilitation doctor kept you informed about your treatment and progress” was calculated retrospectively for five months before and after the physiatrist donned the button. Comparisons were made to two other inpatient physiatrists. For the button-wearing physiatrist, mean score for the physician-specific patient satisfaction survey question for the five months before donning the button was 88.1 ± 11.5; and, for the five months after donning the button, the mean score was 95.8 ± 5.9. These scores were marginally statistically different (p = 0.07). Conversely, the difference in mean scores over the same time periods for two other inpatient physiatrists who did not wear the button did not approach statistical significance. In conclusion, a wearable visual cue improved the PGPSS score specific to the question the visual cue addressed.

Share and Cite:

Pellicane, AJ. (2013) The effect of a wearable visual cue on patient satisfaction survey scores in the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting. Health, 5, 6-8. doi: 10.4236/health.2013.56A2002.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Zamora, D. (2012) Using patient satisfaction as a basis for reimbursement: Political, financial, and philosophical implications. Creative Nursing, 18, 118-123. doi:10.1891/1078-4535.18.3.118
[2] Zusman, E.E. (2012) HCAHPS replaces Press Ganey survey as quality measure for patient hospital experience. Neurosurgery, 71, N21-N24. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000417536.07871.ed
[3] Rau, J. (2011) Test for hospital budgets: Are the patients pleased? The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/health/patients-grades-
to-affect-hospitals-medicare-reimbursements.html?
_r=0&pagewanted=print
[4] Elliott, M.N., et al. (2009) Effects of survey mode, patient mix, and nonresponse on CAHPS hospital survey scores. Health Services Research, 44, 501-518. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00914.x
[5] Fenton, J.J., et al. (2012) The cost of satisfaction: A national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172, 405-411. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1662
[6] Sirovich, B.E. (2012) How to feed and grow your health care system: comment on “The cost of satisfaction”. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172, 411-413. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.62
[7] Daly, R. (2011) Unsatisfactory marks. Hospitals question use of HCAHPS in scoring for value-based purchasing. Modern Healthcare, 41, 30.
[8] Elliott, M.N., et al. (2010) Do hospitals rank differently on HCAHPS for different patient subgroups? Medical Care Research and Review, 67, 56-73. doi:10.1177/1077558709339066

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.