Evaluation of grain corn grown in New Brunswick for dairy cows

Essi H. Evans, Nancy Clark, Josh Lamont, David Walker

Atlantic Dairy and Forage Institute, Fredericton Junction, NB, Canada.
Essi Evans Technical Advisory Services, Inc., Bowmanville, ON, Canada.
New Brunswick Department of Agriculture & Aquaculture, Fredericton, NB, Canada.

DOI: 10.4236/ojas.2013.31010                

Abstract

Corn harvested as grain is a relatively new crop for the province of New Brunswick. The recent availability of local corn has the potential to improve the sustainability of the dairy industry in New Brunswick, but there is debate within the industry concerning the value and best use of the grain. This experiment was conducted to assess the feeding value of locally-produced corn grain stored as dry grain, ensiled high moisture corn, or ensiled as high moisture corncob meal (HMCCM, unhusked ears sometimes referred to as snaplage) relative to dry grain obtained from Ontario. Three samples of each were evaluated In Sacco. Rates and extent of digestion were similar for local and Ontario corn regardless of presentation for crude protein and starch, but acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber and dry matter digestibility values were lower for HMCCM than other treatments. A 4 × 4 Latin square study was conducted with 16 Holstein cows and 28 day feeding periods. Milk production and milk protein production were higher (P < 0.05) with the locally produced dry corn than with other treatments. Energy corrected milk was lowest with the HMCCM diet. These results indicated that the value of corn produced in New Brunswick is similar to that produced in Ontario.

Keywords

Corn; In Sacco Digestibility; Digestion Rates; Diet Digestibility

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Wilkerson, V.A., Glenn, B.P. and McLeod, K R. (1997) Energy and nitrogen balance in lactating cows fed diets containing dry or high moisture corn in either rolled or ground form. Journal of Dairy Science, 80, 2487-2496. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76201-5
[2]	Klosterman, E.W., Johnson, R.R., Scott, H.W., Moxon, A.L. and Van Stavern, J. (1960) Whole plant and ground ear corn silages, their acid content, feeding value and digestibility. Journal of Animal Science, 19, 522-532.
[3]	Cooper, R.J., Milton, C.T., Klopfenstein, T.J., Scott, T.L., Wilson, C.B. and Mass, R.A. (2002) Effect of corn processing on starch digestion and bacte-rial crude protein flow in finishing cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 797- 804.
[4]	Archibeque, S.L., Miller, D.N., Freetly, H.C. and Ferrell, C.L. (2006) Feeding high moisture corn instead of dry-rolled corn reduces odorous compounds production in manure of finishing beef cattle without decreasing performance. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 1767-1777. doi:10.2527/jas.2005-448
[5]	Lardy, G. (2004) Earlage offers corn producers an option. North Dakota Extension Service. http://www.ext.nodak.edu/extnews/newsrelease/2004/111104/07earlag.htm
[6]	Harrison, J. and Johnson, L. (2002) Managing silage for profit and environmental stewardship. Proceedings of the Pacific Northwest Animal Nutrition Conference, 115.
[7]	McQueen, R.E., Buch, R.S. and Nicholson, J.W.G. (1980) Variability of forage digestion in nylon bags suspended in the rumen. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 60, 1038.
[8]	Orskov. E.R., and McDonald, P. (1979) The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge), 92, 499-503. doi:10.1017/S0021859600063048
[9]	Shirley, J.E. (2006) Milk efficiency is an important management tool for dairy producers. Proceedings of the High Plains Nutrition Conference, 63-67.
[10]	Firkins, J.L., Eastridge, M.L., St. Pierre, N.R. and Noftsger, S.M. (2001) Effects of grain variability and processing on starch utilization in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science, 79, E218-E238.
[11]	Esker, P., Shaver, R., Leverich, J., Ballweg, M., Hoffman, P. and Rankin, M. (2010) 2009-2010 Dairy cattle feeding issues with high moisture corn, snaplage and dry shell corn. http://www.uwex.edu/ces/dairynutrition/documents/09-10cornfordairycattleeskeretal.v10-28-2009.pdf
[12]	Lopes, J.C., Shaver, R.D., Hoffman, P.C., Akins, M.S., Bertics, S.J., Gencoglu, H. and Coors, J.C. (2009) Type of corn endosperm influences nutrient digestibility in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 4541-4548. doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2090
[13]	Taylor, C.C. and Allen, M.S. (2005) Corn grain endosperm type and brown midrib 3 corn silage: Site of digestion and ruminal digestion kinetics in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 1413-1424. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72809-5
[14]	Nosek, J.E. (1987) Characterization of in situ dry matter and nitrogen digestion of various corn grain forms. Journal of Dairy Science, 70, 2291-2301. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80289-8
[15]	Ekinci, C. and Broderick, G.A. (1997) Effect of processing high moisture ear corn on ruminal fermentation and milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science, 80, 3298-3307. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76305-7
[16]	Zinn, R.A., Owens, F.A. and Ware, R.A. (2002) Flaking corn: Processing mechanics, quality standards and impact on energy availability and performance of feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 1145-1156.