Lazy or Greedy? Impact of Xenophobic Beliefs on Natives’ Attitudes towards Redistribution

Download Download as PDF (Size:215KB)  HTML    PP. 30-38  
DOI: 10.4236/ojps.2013.31005    2,459 Downloads   6,234 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Several recent accounts have shown that anti-immigrant feeling among citizens seems to reduce the support for the welfare state. As a consequence, the rise of immigration could produce a deep change in industrialized countries’ social security systems. This paper provides evidence that support for redistribution is not decreased by generic xenophobia, but by a specific kind of xenophobic belief. It also shows that some other xenophobic beliefs tend rather to produce a demand for governmental protection programs. Based on a multivariate analysis on individual and contextual French data, findings show that the support for social protection programs is positively related to the fear of competition from immigrants and negatively with the fear that immigrants strain the welfare state. This result can be generalized to other countries where “redistributive xenophobia” is much more widespread.

Cite this paper

Magni Berton, R. (2013) Lazy or Greedy? Impact of Xenophobic Beliefs on Natives’ Attitudes towards Redistribution. Open Journal of Political Science, 3, 30-38. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2013.31005.

References

[1] Alesina, A., & Edward, L. G. (2004). Fighting poverty in the US and in Europe: A world of difference. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199267669.001.0001
[2] Alesina, A., & Eliana La, F. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 897-931. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.009
[3] Blekesaune, M., & Quadagno, J. (2003) Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19, 415-27. doi:10.1093/esr/19.5.415
[4] Bréchon, P., & Tchernia, J.-F. (Eds.) (2009). La France à travers ses valeurs. Paris: Armand Colin.
[5] Campbell, D. E. (2006). Why we vote: How schools and communities shape our civic life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[6] Crepaz, & Markus M. L. (2008) Trust beyond Borders. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
[7] Cusack, T., Iversen, T., & Rehm, P. (2006). Risk at work: The demand and supply sides of government redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22, 365-389. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grj022
[8] Eger, M. A. (2010). Even in Sweden: The effect of immigration on support for welfare state spending. European sociological review, 26, 203-217. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp017
[9] Finseraas, H. (2008). Immigration and preferences for redistribution: An empirical analysis of European survey data. Comparative European Politics, 6, 407-431. doi:10.1057/cep.2008.3
[10] James, E. (1993). Why do different countries choose a different public-private mix of educational services? Journal of Human Resources, 28, 571-592. doi:10.2307/146161
[11] Johnston, R., Bantinga, K., Kymlicka, W., & Soroka, S. (2010). National identity and support for the welfare state. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43, 349-377. doi:10.1017/S0008423910000089
[12] Habyarimana, J., Humphreys, M., Posner, D. D., & Weinstein, J. M. (2007). Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision. American Political Science Review, 101, 709-725. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070499
[13] Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95, 875-895.
[14] Keely, L. C., & Chih, M. T. (2008). Understanding preferences for income redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 944-961. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.11.006
[15] Luttmer, E. F. P. (2001). Group loyalty and the taste for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 109, 500-528. doi:10.1086/321019
[16] McGhee, E. M., & Neiman, M. (2010). Concern over immigration and support for public services. California Journal of Politics and Policy, 2.
[17] Moene, K. O., & Wallerstein, M. (2001). Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. American Political Science Review, 95, 859-874.
[18] Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, presidents and public opinion. New York: Wiley.
[19] Mueller, D. C., & Murrell, P. (1986). Interest groups and the size of government. Public Choice, 48, 125-145. doi:10.1007/BF00179727
[20] Roemer, J. E., & Van der Straeten, K. (2005), Xenophobia and the size of the public sector in France: A politico-economic analysis. Journal of Economics, 86, 95-144. doi:10.1007/s00712-005-0142-x
[21] Roemer, J. E., Lee, W., & Van der Straeten, K. (2007). Racism, xenophobia and redistribution, A study of multi-issue politics in advanced democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[22] Senik, C., Stichnoth, H., & Van der Straeten, K. (2009). Immigration and natives’ attitudes towards the welfare state: Evidence from the European social survey. Social Indicators Research, 91, 345-370. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9342-4
[23] Soroka, S., Banting, K., & Johnston, R. (2006). Immigration and redistribution in a global era. In S. Bowles, P. Bardhan, & M. Wallerstein (Eds.), Globalization and egalitarian redistribution (pp. 261-288). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.