OJO> Vol.2 No.4, December 2012

The Recent Development of MIPO in Long Bone Fractures

DownloadDownload as PDF (Size:153KB) Full-Text HTML PP. 159-165   DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2012.24030

ABSTRACT

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), which is developed under the guidance of biological osteosynthesis (BO) rules, can achieve faster and better rehabilitation. MIPO is mainly used in long bone fractures such as humerus, tibia and femur, but the technique is distinctive in each fracture site. The operative method, experimental outcome and comparison with other internal fixation methods will be discussed to determine whether MIPO is the best method or alternative method in fracture treatment. Other technique such as less invasive stabilizing system (LISS), which is developed on the basis of MIPO will also be introduced. In this review article, a general view of recent development MIPO is to be given.

KEYWORDS


Cite this paper

M. Li, X. Zhang, X. Liu and Y. Jing, "The Recent Development of MIPO in Long Bone Fractures," Open Journal of Orthopedics, Vol. 2 No. 4, 2012, pp. 159-165. doi: 10.4236/ojo.2012.24030.

References

[1] S. M. Perren, “Fracture Healing. The Evolution of Our Understanding,” Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, Vol. 75, No. 4, 2008, pp. 241-246.
[2] Z. An, B. Zeng, X. He, Q. Chen and S. Hu, “Plating Osteosynthesis of Mid-Distal Humeral Shaft Fractures: Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Open Reduction Technique,” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2010, pp. 131-135.
[3] M. Wagner and R. Frigg, “AO Manual of Fracture Management: Internal Fixators: Concepts and Cases Using LCP/LISS,” TAC, 2006.
[4] C. Gerber, J. Mast and R. Ganz, “Biological Internal Fixation of Fractures,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 109, No. 6, 1990, pp. 295-303. doi:10.1007/BF00636165
[5] R. H. Palmer, “Biological Osteosynthesis,” The Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice, Vol. 29, No. 5, 1999, pp. 1171-1185.
[6] Krettek C: Foreword, “Concepts of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis,” Injury, Vol. 28 No. S1, 1997, pp. A1-A2. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(97)90108-X
[7] T. Apivatthakakul, O. Arpornchayanon, S. Bavornratanavech, “Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the Humeral Shaft Fracture. Is It Possible? A Cadaveric Study and Preliminary Report,” Injury, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2005, pp. 530-538. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2004.05.036
[8] F. Baumgaertel, M. Buhl and B. A. Rahn, “Fracture Healing in Biological Plate Osteosynthesis,” Injury, Vol. 29, No. S3, 1998, pp. C3-C6. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(98)95002-1
[9] B. Livani, W. Belangero, K. Andrade, G. Zuiani and R. Pratali, “Is MIPO in Humeral Shaft Fractures Really Safe? Postoperative Ultrasonographic Evaluation,” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2009, pp. 1719-1723. doi:10.1007/s00264-008-0616-x
[10] A. Zhiquan, Z. Bingfang, W. Yeming, Z. Chi and H. Peiyan, “Minimally Invasive Plating Osteosynthesis (MIPO) of Middle and Distal Third Humeral Shaft Fractures,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 21, No. 9, 2007, pp. 628-633. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815928c2
[11] T. W. Lau, F. Leung, C. F. Chan and S. P. Chow, “Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fracture,” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2007, pp. 657-664. doi:10.1007/s00264-006-0242-4
[12] M. S. Shetty, M. A.Kumar, K. Sujay, A. R. Kini and K. G. Kanthi, “Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Humerus Diaphyseal Fractures,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, Vol. 45, No. 6, 2011, pp. 520-526.
[13] B. Livani, W. D. Belangero and R. Castro de Medeiros, “Fractures of the Distal Third of the Humerus with Palsy of the Radial Nerve: Management Using Minimally-Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume, Vol. 88, No. 12, 2006, pp. 1625-1628. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B12.17924
[14] J. M. Concha, A. Sandoval and P. N. Streubel, “Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Humeral Shaft Fractures: Are Results Reproducible?” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 34, No. 8, 2010, pp. 1297-1305. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0893-z
[15] Cheng W, Li Y, Manyi W, “Comparison Study of Two Surgical Options for Distal Tibia Fracture-Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Vs. Open Reduction And Internal Fixation,” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 35, No. 5, 2011, pp. 737-742. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1052-2
[16] O. J. Sohn and D. H. Kang, “Staged Protocol in Treatment of Open Distal Tibia Fracture: Using Lateral MIPO,” Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2011, pp. 69-76.
[17] C. Kayali, H. Agus, A. Eren and S. Ozluk, “How Should Open Tibia Fractures Be Treated? A Retrospective Comparative Study between Intramedullary Nailing and Biologic Plating,” Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2009, pp. 243-248.
[18] T. W. Lau, F. Leung, C. F. Chan and S. P. Chow, “Wound Complication of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Tibia Fractures,” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2008, pp. 697-703. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0384-z
[19] S. Singh, P. R. Patel, A. K. Joshi, R. N. Naik, C. Nagaraj and S. Kumar, “Biological Approach to Treatment of Intra-Articular Proximal Tibial Fractures with Double Osteosynthesis,” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2009, pp. 271-274.
[20] C. A. Mueller, C. Eingartner, E. Schreitmueller, S. Rupp, J. Goldhahn, F. Schuler, K. Weise, U. Pfister and N. P. Suedkamp, “Primary Stability of Various Forms of Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Fractures of the Proximal Tibia,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume, Vol. 87, No. 3, 2005, pp. 426-432. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.87B3.14353
[21] J. P. Stannard, C. G. Finkemeier, J. Lee and P. J. Kregor, “Utilization of the less-Invasive Stabilization System Internal Fixator for Open Fractures of the Proximal Tibia: A Multi-Center Evaluation,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2008, pp. 426-430.
[22] R. M. Nayak, M. R. Koichade, A. N. Umre and M. V. Ingle, “Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Using a Locking Compression Plate for Distal Femoral Fractures,” The Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2011, pp. 185-190.
[23] C. Hierholzer, C. von Ruden, T. Potzel, A. Woltmann and V. Buhren, “Outcome Analysis of Retrograde Nailing and Less Invasive Stabilization System in Distal Femoral Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2011, pp. 243-250.
[24] K. A. Egol, E. N. Kubiak, E. Fulkerson, F. J.Kummer and K. J. Koval, “Biomechanics of Locked Plates and Screws,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 18, No. 8, 2004, pp. 488-493. doi:10.1097/00005131-200409000-00003
[25] L. W. Xu, W. P. Ji, H. Li, P. F. Zhao and B. Wu, “Treatment of Osteoporotic Distal Femur Fractures with Less Invasive Stabilizing System (LISS) and High Strength Injectable Graft,” China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2010, pp. 144-146.
[26] P. Kanabar, V. Kumar, P. J. Owen and N. Rushton, “Less Invasive Stabilisation System Plating for Distal Femoral Fractures,” The Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2007, pp. 299-302.
[27] W. Kolb, H. Guhlmann, C. Windisch, F. Marx, K. Kolb and H. Koller, “Fixation of Distal Femoral Fractures with the Less Invasive Stabilization System: A Minimally Invasive Treatment with Locked Fixed-Angle Screws,” The Journal of Trauma, Vol. 65, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1425-1434. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318166d24a
[28] F. C. Kao, Y. K. Tu, J. Y. Su, K. Y. Hsu, C. H. Wu and M. C. Chou, “Treatment of Distal Femoral Fracture by Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis: Comparison between the Dynamic Condylar Screw and the Less Invasive Stabilization System,” The Journal of Trauma, Vol. 67, No. 4, 2009, pp. 719-726. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31819d9cb2
[29] M. Schutz, M. Muller, P. Regazzoni, D. Hontzsch, C. Krettek, C. Van der Werken and N. Haas, “Use of the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) in Patients with Distal Femoral (AO33) Fractures: A Prospective Multicenter Study,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 125, No. 2, 2005, pp. 102-108. doi:10.1007/s00402-004-0779-x
[30] T. Apivatthakakul and S. Chiewcharntanakit, “Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Fracture where Intramedullary Nailing Is Not Indicated,” International Orthopaedics, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1119-1126. doi:10.1007/s00264-008-0603-2
[31] D. Hontzsch, “Distal Femoral Fracture-Technical Possibilities,” Kongressband Deutsche Gesellschaft Fur Chirurgie Kongress, Vol. 118, 2001, pp. 371-374.
[32] R. A. Winquist, S. T. Hansen, D. K. Clawson Jr., “Closed Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Fractures. A Report of Five Hundred and Twenty Cases,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, Vol. 66, No. 4, 1984, pp. 529-539.
[33] T. Apivatthakakul, C. Phornphutkul, T. Bunmaprasert, K. Sananpanich, A. Fernandez Dell’Oca, “Percutaneous Cerclage Wiring and Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO): A Percutaneous Reduction Technique in the Treatment of Vancouver Type B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 132, No. 6, 2012, pp. 813-822. doi:10.1007/s00402-012-1489-4

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.