The lability of behavior as a marker of comorbid depression and anxiety
Irina N. Trofimova, William Sulis
.
DOI: 10.4236/abb.2010.13027   PDF    HTML     5,772 Downloads   10,694 Views   Citations

Abstract

This study examines nine dynamical and three emotional aspects of behavior in depression and anxiety, singly and comorbidly. The study employs the Structure of Temperament Questionnaire Compact (STQ 77), whose 12 scales assess the energetic, lability and sensitivity aspects of behavior in the physical, social, mental and emotional domains. The STQ 77 was administered to 86 patients with Major Depression, 85 patients with an anxiety disorder, 43 patients with comorbid depression and anxiety, and 71 subjects without depression or anxiety disorder all presenting to a private outpatient clinical practice. Results: 1) Depression was associated with self-reports of increased impulsivity and rigidity of behavior; 2) Depressed patients reported significantly lower physical energy, tempo of physical activity and plasticity of behavior. The presence of comorbid anxiety further worsened these effects; 3) The ability to sustain attention on a mental task and to learn new information was lower in depressed patients than in other groups. Conclusions: comorbid depression and anxiety might be associates, decreasing adaptivity and the self-regulatory balance of behavior, leading to the de- velopment of extremes in behavioral reactivity (impulsivity and rigidity).v

Share and Cite:

Trofimova, I. and Sulis, W. (2010) The lability of behavior as a marker of comorbid depression and anxiety. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 1, 190-199. doi: 10.4236/abb.2010.13027.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Spinhoven, P., DeRooij, M., Heiser, W., Smit, J.H. and Penninx, B.W. (2009). The role of personality in comorbidity among anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care and specialty care: A cross sectional analysis. General Hospital Psychiatry, 31(5), 470-477.
[2] Moffitt, T.E., Harrington, H., Capsi, A., Kim-Cohen, J., Goldberg, D., Gregory, A.M. and Poulton, R. (2007) Depression and generalized anxiety disorder: Cumulative and sequential comorbidity in a birth cohort followed prospectively to age 32 years. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(6), 651-660.
[3] Moller, H.J. (2002) Anxiety associated with comorbid depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 63(13), 22- 26.
[4] Kant, I. (1798) Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view. (M. Gregor, trans.) Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1974.
[5] Smillie, L., Bhairo, Y., Gray, J., Gunasinghe, C., Elkin, A., McGuffin, P. and Farmer, A. (2009) Personality and the bipolar spectrum: normative and classification data for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-R. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 50(1), 48-53.
[6] Thayer, R.E. (1989) The biopsychology of mood and arousal. Oxford, New York.
[7] Gray, J.A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[8] Hundt, N.E., Kimbrela, N.A., Mitchella, J.T. and Nelson-Graya, R.O. (2008) High BAS, but not low BIS, predicts externalizing symptoms in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 565-575.
[9] Farmer, R.F. and Seeley, J.R. (2009) Temperament and character predictors of depressed mood over a 4-year interval. Depression and Anxiety, 26(4), 371-381.
[10] Jiang, N., Sato, T., Hara, T., Takedomi, Y., Ozaki, I. and Yamada, S. (2003) Correlations between trait anxiety, personality and fatigue study based on the temperament and character inventory. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55(6), 493-500.
[11] Mehrabian, A. (1995) Distinguishing depression and trait anxiety in terms of basic dimensions of temperament. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 15(2), 133-143.
[12] Healy, B. and Kulig, J. (2006) Temperament, Anxiety, and Attentional Control. Psychological Reports, 98(1), 23-29
[13] Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y.S. and Bagby, R.M. (2008) On the hierarchical structure of mood and anxiety disorders: confirmatory evidence and elaboration of a model of temperament markers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(3), 576-590.
[14] Weiss, A., Sutin, A.R., Duberstein, P.R., Friedman, B., Bagby, R.M. and Costa, P.T. (2009) The personality domains and styles of the five-factor model are related to incident depression in Medicare recipients aged 65 to 100. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(7), 591-601.
[15] Rubino, I.A., Zanasi, M., Robone, C. and Siracusano, A. (2009) Personality differences between depressed melancholic and non-melancholic inpatients. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(2), 145-148.
[16] Pavlov, I.P. (1941) Lectures on conditioned reflexes, II. International Publishers, NY.
[17] Kretschmer, E. (1925) Physique and Character: An investigation of the nature of constitution and of the theory of temperament. (W. Sprott, trans.) Harcourt Brace, NY.
[18] Rusalov, V.M. (1979) Biologicheskiye osnovi individual’ no-psichologicheskih razlichiy (Biological basis of individual psychological differences). Nauka, Мoscow, 1979.
[19] Rusalov, V.M. (1989) Object-related and communicative aspects of human temperament: A new questionnaire of the structure of temperament. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(8), 817-827.
[20] Rusalov, V.M. (1997) Questionnaire of formal-dyna- mical properties of individuality. Manual, Russian Academy of Sciences, IPAN Press, Moscow.
[21] Rusalov, V.M. and Trofimova, I.N. (2007) Structure of temperament and its measurement. Psychological Services Press, Toronto, Canada.
[22] Trofimova, I. (2010a) Exploration of the activity-specific model of temperament in four cultures. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10(1), 79-95.
[23] Trofimova, I. (2010b) An investigation into differences between the structure of temperament and the structure of personality. American Journal of Psychology. In Press.
[24] Trofimova, I. (2009) Exploration of the benefits of an activity-specific test of temperament. Psychological Reports, 105(2), 643-658.
[25] Trofimova, I. (2010c) Questioning the “general arousal” models. Open Behavioral Sciences and Psychology Jour- nal, 4, 1-8.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.