Joint Treatment of Random Variability and Imprecision in GPS Data Analysis

Hansjorg Kutterer

DGFI, Marstallplatz 8, D-80539 Munich, Germany.

DOI:                 

Abstract

In the geodetic applications of the Global Positioning System (GPS) various types of data uncertainty are relevant. The most prominent ones are random variability (stochasticity) and imprecision. Stochasticity is caused by uncontrollable effects during the observation process. Imprecision is due to remaining systematic deviations between data and model due to imperfect knowledge or just for practical reasons. Depending on the particular application either stochasticity or imprecision may dominate the uncertainty budget. For the joint treatment of stochasticity and imprecision two main problems have to be solved. First, the imprecision of the original data has to be modelled in an adequate way. Then this imprecision has to be transferred to the quantities of interest. Fuzzy data analysis offers a proper mathematical theory to handle both problems. The main outcome is confidence regions for estimated parameters which are superposed by the effects of data imprecision. In the paper two applications are considered in a general way: the resolution of the phase ambiguity parameters and the estimation of point positions. The paper concludes with numerical examples for ambiguity resolution.

Keywords

Fuzzy data analysis, imprecision, fuzzy confidence regions, GPS, ambiguity resolution

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Abidin H. (1993): Computational and Geometrical Aspects of On-The-Fly Ambiguity Resolution. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Surveying Engineering Technical Report No. 164, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.
[2]	Bandemer H.; Naher W. (1992): Fuzzy Data Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
[3]	Dubois D.; Prade H. (1980): Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Academic Press, New York.
[4]	Hofmann-Wellenhof B.; Lichtenegger H.; Collins J. (1997): GPS Theory and Practice (4th Ed.). Springer, Wien New York.
[5]	Kutterer H. (2001a): Uncertainty assessment in geodetic data analysis. In: Carosio A; Kutterer H. (Eds.): Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Robust Statistics and Fuzzy Techniques in Geodesy and GIS. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing - Report No. 295, 7-12.
[6]	Kutterer H. (2001b): An imprecise search space for GPS phase ambiguity parameters. In: Carosio A; Kutterer H. (Eds.): Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Robust Statistics and Fuzzy Techniques in Geodesy and GIS. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing - Report No. 295, 215-220.
[7]	Kutterer (2002): Zum Umgang mit Ungewissheit in der Geodasie - Bausteine fur eine neue Fehlertheorie. Habilitation Thesis, DGK Series C 553, Munich.
[8]	Leinen S. (2001): Fuzzy-Logic based GPS On-The-Fly Ambiguity Search. In: Carosio A; Kutterer H. (Eds.): Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Robust Statistics and Fuzzy Techniques in Geodesy and GIS. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing - Report No. 295, 209-214.
[9]	Parkinson B. W.; Spilker J. J. (1996): Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications - Vols. I and II. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics 163, American Institute of Astronautics and Aeronautics, Washington, DC.
[10]	Teunissen P. J. G.; Kleusberg A. (1998): GPS for Geodesy (2nd Ed.). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
[11]	Viertl R. (1996): Statistical Methods for Non-Precise Data. CRC Press, Boca Raton New York London Tokyo.
[12]	Zadeh L. A. (1965): Fuzzy sets. Information Control 8 (1965): 338 - 353.