Severe Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis Following Laser in Situ Keratomileusis with an Iatrogenic Double Flap

Hidemasa Torii, Kazuno Negishi, Murat Dogru, Kazuo Tsubota

Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan..

DOI: 10.4236/ojoph.2012.22008                

Abstract

We present a case of an iatrogenic double flap created during laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser microkeratome that resulted in development of severe diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK). The DLK occurred mainly in the second interface, made by the spatula accidentally and not exposed to femtosecond or excimer lasers. Because of differences in the severity of the interface inflammatory reactions between the two layers exposed to the same spatula, an allergic reaction to detergent, bacteria, or other chemicals could not be assumed to be the main cause of DLK. Our observations in this case may suggest an important association of neural factors with DLK, because the inflammatory reaction occurred mainly in the deep stromal layer at the thick corneal nerves.

Keywords

Laser in Situ Keratomileusis; Femtosecond Laser; Complications; Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	S. G. Slade, “The Use of the Femtosecond Laser in the Customization of Corneal Flaps in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2007, pp. 314-317. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3281bd88a0
[2]	H. K. Soong and J. B. Malta, “Femtosecond Lasers in Ophthalmology,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 147, No. 2, 2009, pp. 189-197.
[3]	J. Javaloy, M. T. Vidal, A. M. Abdelrahman, A. Artola and J. L. Alio, “Confocal Microscopy Comparison of Intralase Femtosecond Laser and Moria M2 Microkeratome in Lasik,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2007, pp. 178-187.
[4]	M. Moshirfar, J. P. Gardiner, J. A. Schliesser, L. Espandar, V. Feiz, M. D. Mifflin and J. C. Chang, “Laser in Situ Kera-tomileusis Flap Complications Using Mechanical Micro-keratome versus Femtosecond Laser: Retrospective Comparison,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 11, 2010, pp. 1925-1933. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.027
[5]	C. H. Choe, C. Guss, D. C. Musch, L. M. Niziol and R. M. Shtein, “Incidence of Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis after Lasik with 15 Khz, 30 Khz, and 60 Khz Femtosecond Laser Flap Creation,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 11, 2010, pp. 1912-1918. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.09.003
[6]	P. S. Binder, “Flap Dimensions Created with the Intralase Fs Laser,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2004, pp. 26-32. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00578-9
[7]	R. Gil-Cazorla, M. A. Teus, L. De Benito-Llopis and I. Fuentes, “Incidence of Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis after Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Associated with the Intralase 15 Khz Femtosecond Laser and Moria M2 Microkeratome,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2008, pp. 28-31. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.08.025
[8]	M. V. Netto, R. R. Mohan, F. W. Medeiros, W. J. Dupps Jr., S. Sinha, R. R. Krueger, W. M. Stapleton, M. Rayborn, C. Suto and S. E. Wilson, “Femtosecond Laser and Microkeratome Corneal Flaps: Comparison of Stromal Wound Healing and Inflammation,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 7, 2007, pp. 667-676.
[9]	J. L. Alio, J. J. Perez-Santonja, T. Tervo, K. F. Tabbara, M. Vesaluoma, R. J. Smith, B. Maddox and R. K. Maloney, “Postoperative Inflammation, Microbial Complications, and Wound Healing Following Laser in Situ Keratomileusis,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2000, pp. 523-538.
[10]	J. H. Krachmer, M. J. Mannis and E. J. Holland, “Cornea,” Mosby/Elsevier, St. Louis, 2011.