Evaluation of Best Management Practices in Millsboro Pond Watershed Using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model

Aditya Sood, William F. Ritter

.

DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2010.25047                

Abstract

The Inland Bays in southern Delaware (USA) are facing eutrophication due to the nutrient loading from its watershed. The source of nutrients in the watershed is predominantly agriculture. The Millsboro Pond, a sub-watershed within the Inland Bays basin, was modeled using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. It was found that the contribution of ground water from outside the watershed had a signifi-cant impact on the hydrology of the region. Once the model was calibrated and validated, five management scenarios were implemented, one at a time, to measure its effectiveness in reducing the nutrient loading in the watershed. Among the Best Management Practices (BMPs), planting winter cover crops on the agricul-ture land was the most effective method in reducing the nutrient loads. The second most effective method was to provide grassland riparian zones. The BMPs alone were not able to achieve the nutrient load reduc-tion as required by the Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Two extra scenarios that involved in replac-ing agriculture land with forest, first with deciduous trees and then with high yielding trees were considered. It is suggested that to achieve the required TMDL for the watershed, some parts of the agricultural land may have to be effectively converted into the managed forest with some high yielding trees such as hybrid poplar trees providing cellulose raw material for bio fuels. The remaining agriculture land should take up the prac-tice of planting winter cover crops and better nutrient management. Riparian zones, either in form of forest or grasslands, should be the final line of defense for reducing nutrient loading in the watershed.

Keywords

Watershed, BMPs, Modelling, SWAT

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	J. Larsen, “Dead Zones Increasing in World’s Coastal Waters,” Earth Policy Institute, 16 June 2004. http://www. earth-policy.org/Updates/Update41.htm
[2]	Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Envi-ronmental Control, “Inland Bays/Atlantic Ocean Basin Assessment Report,” June 2001.
[3]	Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Envi-ronmental Control, 2000. http://www.dnrec.state.de.us/DN REC2000/Library/Misc/InlandBays.pdf
[4]	Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Envi-ronmental Control, “Inland Bays Pollution Control Strat-egy,” April 2007. http://www.dnrec.state.de.us/water2000 /Sections/Watershed/ws/ib_pcs.htm
[5]	Delaware Poultry Industry. http://www.dpichicken.org
[6]	Environmental Protection Agency, “Impaired Waters and Total Maximum Daily Loads,” http://www.epa.gov/owow /tmdl/
[7]	P. W. Gassman, M. R. Reyes, C. H. Green and J. G. Ar-nold, “The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Direc-tions,” Transactions of the ASABE, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2007, pp. 1211-2150.
[8]	J. G. Arnold and N. Fohrer, “SWAT2000: Current Capa-bilities and Research Opportunities in Applied Watershed Modeling.” Hydrological Processes, Vol. 19, 2005, pp. 563-572.
[9]	J. A. Volka, K. B. Savidgeb, J. R. Scudlarkb A. S. An-dresc and W. J. Ullman, “Nitrogen Loads through Base-flow, Stormflow, and Underflow to Rehoboth Bay, Delaware,” Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 35, August 2006, pp. 1742-1755.
[10]	C. Santhi, R. Srinivasan, J. G. Arnold and J. R. Williams, “A Modeling Approach to Evaluate the Impacts of Water Quality Management Plans Implemented in a Watershed in Texas,” Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 1141-1157.
[11]	S. L. Neitsch, J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, J. R. Williams and K. W. King, “Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theo-retical Documentation, Version 2000,” Soil and Water Research Laboratory and Blackland Research Center, Grassland, 2002.
[12]	Delaware Geological Survey, “Delaware Inland Bays Tributary Total Maximum Daily Load Water-Quality Database,” 2009. http://www.dgs.udel.edu/Hydrology/Sur faceWater.aspx
[13]	J. E. Nash and J. V. Sutcliffe, “River Flow Forcasting through Conceptual Models Part I—A Discussion of Principles,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 10, No. 3, April 1970, pp. 282-290.
[14]	P. O. Yapo, H. V. Gupta and S. Sorooshian, “Multi-Ob-jective Global Optimization for Hydrologic Models,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 204, No. 1-4, January 1998, pp. 83-97.
[15]	J. G. Arnold and P. M. Allen, “Automated Methods for Estimating Base Flow and Groundwater Recharge from Stream Flow Records,” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1999, pp. 411-424.
[16]	T. W. Chu and A. Shirmohammadi, “Evaluation of the SWAT Model’s Hydrology Component in the Piedmont Physiographic Region of Maryland,” Transactions of the ASAE, Vol. 47, No. 5, 2004, pp. 1523-1538.
[17]	T. W. Chu, A. Shirmohammadi, H. Montas and A. Sadeghi, “Evaluation of the SWAT Model’s Sediment and Nutrient Components in the Piedmont Physiographic Region of Maryland,” Transactions of the ASAE, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2004, pp. 1057-1073.
[18]	United States Department of Energy, “Cellulosic Ethanol Research and Development.,” 2008. http://www.eere.en-ergy.gov/afdc/fuels/ethanol_research.html
[19]	A. E. Farrell, R. J. Plevin, B. T. Turner, A. D. Jones, M. O'Hare and D. M. Kammen, “Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals,” Science, Vol. 311, No. 5760, 27 January 2006, pp. 506-508.
[20]	L. R. Lynd, “Overview and Evaluation of Fuel Ethanol from Cellulosic Biomass: Technology, Economics, the Environment, and Policy,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, Vol. 21, November 1996, pp. 403-465.
[21]	L. R. Lynd, J. H. Cushman, R. J. Nichols and C. E. Wyman, “Fuel Ethanol from Cellulosic Biomass,” Sci-ence, New Series, Vol. 251, No. 4999, 15 March 1991, pp 1318-1323.
[22]	R. Lowrance, R. Todd, J. Fail, O. Hendrickson, R. Leo-nard and L. Asmussen, “Riparian Forests as Nutrient Fil-ters in Agricultural Watersheds,” BioScience, Vol. 34, No. 6, June 1984, pp. 374-377.
[23]	L. Philip, C. Smythb and S. Boutin, “Quantitative Review of Riparian Buffer Width Guidelines from Canada and the United States,” Journal of Environmental Manage-ment, Vol. 70, No. 2, February 2004, pp. 165-180.
[24]	“Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative,” 2007. http://www. rggi.org
[25]	C. A. Zelek and G. E. Shively, “Measuring the Opportu-nity Cost of Carbon Sequestration in Tropical Agricul-ture,” Land Economics, Vol. 79, No. 3, August 2003, pp. 342-354.