Acute non-renal adverse events after unenhanced and enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging - Open Journal of Clinical Diagnostics

OJCD > Vol.3 No.3, September 2013

Open Journal of Clinical Diagnostics

Volume 3, Issue 3 (September 2013)

ISSN Print: 2162-5816 ISSN Online: 2162-5824

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.06 Citations

Acute non-renal adverse events after unenhanced and enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging ()

HTML

Download as PDF (Size: 142KB) PP. 85-93

DOI: 10.4236/ojcd.2013.33016 4,058 Downloads 6,449 Views Citations

Author(s)

Manal Azzouz, Janne Rømsing, Henrik S. Thomsen

Affiliation(s)

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark.
Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.

ABSTRACT

Aim: Investigating the incidence of non-renal acute adverse events (AAEs) in patients undergoing unenhanced or enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) (four groups) using the ac- tive interview-method. Methods: The imaging procedure followed the standards of the department. Furthermore, the iodine-based (nonionic monomer) and gadolinium-based (cyclic) contrast agent was the same as used for all other examinations in the department. All patients were interviewed for 72 hours after the MR or CT examination regarding occurrence of AAEs using a structured questionnaire. Results: A total of 1358 patients (259 with enhanced MR, 434 with unenhanced MR, 450 with enhanced CT and 215 with unenhanced CT) were enrolled. AAEs were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the contrast enhanced MR [48 (18.5%)] and CT [35 (7.7%)] groups compared to unenhanced MR [39 (9.0%)] and CT [5 (2.3%)] groups. Dizziness was significantly [19 (7.3%), (P < 0.05)] more frequent in the enhanced MR. The same AAEs were reported in both contrast groups and control groups. Conclusion: AAEs which are mainly considered to be caused by the contrast medium are also experienced by patients undergoing CT or MR without contrast. Enhanced MR is correlated with more reactions than unenhanced MR and enhanced CT. Dizziness was reported more frequently after MR than CT, both with and without contrast; more patients were CNS examined with MR and with CT.

KEYWORDS

Acute Adverse Events; Contrast Media; Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media; Iodine-Based;Contrast Media

Share and Cite:

Azzouz, M. , Rømsing, J. and S. Thomsen, H. (2013) Acute non-renal adverse events after unenhanced and enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Open Journal of Clinical Diagnostics, 3, 85-93. doi: 10.4236/ojcd.2013.33016.

Cited by

[1]	Protective Effect of Oral Steroid Premedication: Adverse Reactions to Nonionic Iodine Contrast Media for Computed Tomography
	Open Journal of …, 2022

[2]	Control groups in studies of contrast media adverse events
	Acta Radiologica, 2016

[3]	Contrast agents in diagnostic imaging: Present and future
	Pharmacological research, 2016

[4]	How to Manage (Treat) Immediate-type Adverse Reactions to GBCA
	Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2016

[5]	How accurate is the label “allergic to iodinated contrast agents”?
	Acta Radiologica, 2015

[6]	Gadolinium-or iodine-based contrast media: which choice?
	Acta Radiologica, 2014

[7]	Can a structured questionnaire identify patients with reduced renal function?
	European radiology.Springer, 2014

[8]	Acute Adverse Reactions to Contrast Media: Mechanisms and Prevention
	Contrast Media.Springer, 2014

[9]	The choice between gadolinium-and iodine-based contrast media.
	BioMed Research International, 2014

[10]	CIN: can we forget it?
	Acta Radiologica, 2014

[11]	Late Adverse Events after Enhanced and Unenhanced MRI and CT: A Prospective Study
	Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2014

Journals Menu

Follow SCIRP

	+1 323-425-8868
	customer@scirp.org
	+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
	1655362766

	Paper Publishing WeChat

Journals Menu

Home

About SCIRP

Service

Policies